Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
Georgia on Your Mind
Raise a glass and toast the end of Ralph Reed, the not-as-funny-as-Dave-Foley Christian Coalition fieldmarshall whose foray into elective politics hit the reef last night. Reed lost the nomination for lieutenant governor to unknown State Senator Casey Cagle, the only candidate who dared to make a race against Reed - the rest of the field had jumped out when Reed entered. Yesterday, Reed's vaunted evangelical turnout machine fell apart and Cagle won by 12 points. This will make your day:
Conservative radio-TV talk show host Sean Hannity and future presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani traveled to Georgia to help Reed build his war chest. Giuliani said it was "very important" that Reed get elected.
Tim Cavanaugh's brutal 2005 takedown of Rudy is here.
Elsewhere in Georgia, cop-blocking Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney was surprisingly forced into a runoff (to win a primary race in Georgia you need to score over 50 percent) against a political nobody, former Cobb County commissioner Hank Johnson. McKinney's camp is telling bloggers that the election was flipped by rigged Diebold machines. Because, obviously, if you're the masters of a Republican election-stealing matrix, you want to keep the Dems' walking bad-headline generator out of Congress.
|7.19.06 @ 9:52AM|#
"Ralph Reed, the not-as-funny-as-Dave-Foley Christian Coalition
fieldmarshall"
All is forgiven, David.
|7.19.06 @ 10:00AM|#
Feel the Foley, Dave. Let it flow through you.
I love the Diebold meme. Again, why would evil Diebold
ever allow a Democrat to win again?
|7.19.06 @ 10:03AM|#
And here I was, gloating that I live in McKinney's district, and not in Georgia 8th District where the Congressman, who sponsored a bill to have the 10 Commandments in all federal buildings, was caught knowing only three of them...
|7.19.06 @ 10:31AM|#
Don't forget that McKinney actually lost the primary to Denise Majette in 2002 and was out of Congress for two years. Unfortunately Majette apparently got a swelled head from the exprience and ran unsuccessfully for the Senate in 2004, freeing the seat up for a McKinney comeback.
|7.19.06 @ 10:59AM|#
"Sorry... I intended to say 'Crack whores for congress.'"
Darn! [puts away baseball bat]
|7.19.06 @ 11:10AM|#
Giuliani said it was "very important" that Reed get
elected.
Uh... WTF?! Is this the same Giuliani who couch-surfed at his gay
buddies' place after the divorce? Who... well, I'm struggling to
come up with any other actions that would get him bitch-slapped out
of Ralph Reed's clique, but I'm sure there were some. This makes me
want to find some more of those "GIULIANI IS A DICK" bumper
stickers that were all the rage circa 2000. I'm sure I still have a
couple stashed away somewhere.
|7.19.06 @ 11:14AM|#
"well, I'm struggling to come up with any other actions that
would get him bitch-slapped out of Ralph Reed's clique, but I'm
sure there were some."
Well, Giuliani has cross-dressed:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49595
|7.19.06 @ 11:23AM|#
Well, Giuliani has cross-dressed
Oh yeah! And thanks for that link to the truly otherworldly
WND.
|7.19.06 @ 11:27AM|#
Despite the claims of theocracy, no one, not even rank and file Republicans want a big bible thumper in power. Yeah, I know Bush claims to be a bible thumper when it is convienient but people voted for him in spite of that not because of it. You have to have a better reason than "I thump the bible and pray everyday and care about families" to get elected. Reed reminds me of the radical feminists on the left. They don't get elected much either because their only message is "I am a woman vote for me its good for you". Reed is no different, "I am a Christian, vote for me" doesn't win too many elections above the level of town school board.
|7.19.06 @ 12:19PM|#
Mr. Hank Johnson who will be Representative McKinney's opponent
in the August 8th run-off, was a _Dekalb_ County Commissioner.
Dekalb county is one of the largest American suburban counties with
an African-American majority. It forms the bulk of the 4th US House
District. Johnson was admittedly not the most high profile
candidate but certainly not a "political nobody".
The August 8th run-off will obviously come down to which candidate
can get their voters to the polls in what is guaranteed to be an
extremely low voter turn out. The third candidate in the race was
explicitly Anti-Mckinney and his 8% of voters (if they show up in
the run-off) could very well put Johnson over the top if his own
voters stay with him. One thing about the run-off is that while
anyone who voted in the Republican ballot yesterday is barred from
voting in the run-off, any other voter in the district can vote in
the run-off. Thus some Republican voters can vote against McKinney
if they desired.
Likewise Casey Cagle is not "unknown" in Georgia Republican
politics. He was first elected in 1994 (years before the Republican
takeover of the state house) and has after-all served as chairman
of the Senate Finance Committee.
One somewhat ironic thing about the Cagle victory is that one could
argue that little of great substance differs in the platform and
outlook of Cagle and Reed. Conservative Republican primary voters
saw in Cagle a similar profile as their own but with out the
negatives that Reed brings to the table.
Those who are rejoicing the loudest in Reed's defeat (and there was
definitely some Democratic voter cross-over in the Republican
primary in order to _vote against_ Ralph Reed) are now presented
with a candidate in Casey Cagle that may have an easier campaign in
November although his platform is similar to Ralph Reed's.
|7.19.06 @ 12:57PM|#
Hey, you rat-soup-eatin' honky motherfucker!
I'm surprised McKinney didn't blame it on the Jews, like she and
her father did in '02.
|7.19.06 @ 1:17PM|#
I knew Ralph Reed at UGA. A personable and funny guy with a
sharp wit and a silver tongue.
And I am so fucking happy that he lost.
|7.19.06 @ 10:46PM|#
In a Georgia primary, anyone can choose to vote on either
party's ballot. You do not register with a party here.
So, I think that a lot of Democrats crossed over and voted against
Reed.
In this case, that's just swell by me.
|7.20.06 @ 8:59AM|#
July 20, 2006
8:55am EDT
We can act vs. global warming, but must avoid hubris
Akron Beacon Journal | Jun 24, 2006
Fisher: Free tickets touch off school debate
The Mercury News | Jun 10, 2006
Gore's got heat in documentary on global warming
Philadelphia Daily News | Jun 2, 2006
PatriotPost.US
American Spectator Editor in Chief R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. says,
"The Patriot is a great source for sound conservative
opinion."
PoliticsNationwide.com
The one-stop source for politics and public policy,
nationwide.
Auto Insurance
The American Spectator
The voice of the true conservative -- Ben Stein, the Washington
Prowler and R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.
Keep Our Markets Free
Investing commentary from a conservative perspective.
Promote Your Company
Distribute a news release with PR
Newswire and create visibility.
CRM Software
SALESFORCE.COM - Rated #1 CRM.
Free 30-Day Trial and Demo.
$100k+ job search
Advertisement
PEGGY NOONAN
The Heat Is On
On global warming, the media's continuing power, Ralph Reed--and
revisiting last week's column.
Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:01 a.m. EDT
During the past week's heat wave--it hit 100 degrees in New York
City Monday--I got thinking, again, of how sad and frustrating it
is that the world's greatest scientists cannot gather, discuss the
question of global warming, pore over all the data from every
angle, study meteorological patterns and temperature histories, and
come to a believable conclusion on these questions: Is global
warming real or not? If it is real, is it necessarily dangerous?
What exactly are the dangers? Is global warming as dangerous as,
say, global cooling would be? Are we better off with an Earth that
is getting hotter or, what with the modern realities of heating
homes and offices, and the world energy crisis, and the need to
conserve, does global heating have, in fact, some potential side
benefits, and can those benefits be broadened and deepened? Also,
if global warning is real, what must--must--the inhabitants of the
Earth do to meet its challenges? And then what should they do to
meet them?
You would think the world's greatest scientists could do this, in
good faith and with complete honesty and a rigorous desire to
discover the truth. And yet they can't. Because science too, like
other great institutions, is poisoned by politics. Scientists have
ideologies. They are politicized.
All too many of them could be expected enter this work not as
seekers for truth but agents for a point of view who are eager to
use whatever data can be agreed upon to buttress their point of
view.
And so, in the end, every report from every group of scientists is
treated as a political document. And no one knows what to believe.
So no consensus on what to do can emerge.
If global warming is real, and if it is new, and if it is caused
not by nature and her cycles but man and his rapacity, and if it in
fact endangers mankind, scientists will probably one day blame The
People for doing nothing.
But I think The People will have a greater claim to blame the
scientists, for refusing to be honest, for operating in cliques and
holding to ideologies. For failing to be trustworthy.
The other day ABC News's Internet political report, The Note,
argued that President Bush, in his then-upcoming veto statement and
other presentations, had better be at the top of his game if he
wants his party to hold on to Congress in 2006. "[Mr. Bush] is
going to need to be focused and impressive, not easy pickings for
the Rich-Krugman-Dowd-Stewart axis."
As I read I nodded: That's exactly true. What was significant is
that The Note did not designate as Mr. Bush's main and most
effective foes Pelosi, Dodd, Reid, Biden, et al. Mr. Bush's
mightiest competitors are columnists and a comedian with a
fake-news show.
This is one reason the media is important. (Not "are important."
Language evolves; usage changes; people vote with their tongues.
It's not the correct "return to normality"; it's the incorrect
"return to normalcy." It's not "the media are" it's "the media is."
People see the media as one big thing.)
One big reason the media is important is that they change things.
And they lead. On 9/11 itself it was the media--anchors, reporters,
crews sent to the scene, analysts--that functioned, for roughly 10
hours, as the most visible leaders of the United States. The
president was on a plane; the vice president was in the bunker and
on the phone. It was on-air journalists who informed, created a
seeming order, and reassured the public by their presence and
personas and professionalism.
So they're important. But very recently it seems to me they're
important because it is from the media that Mr. Bush's most
effective opposition--attacks on his nature and leadership, attacks
on his policies--comes. Among the Democrats an op-ed columnist has
more impact than a minority leader.
It is common wisdom that newspapers are over. But when the most
powerful voices again a powerful president at a crucial time are
op-ed jockeys, newspapers are not over. Or perhaps one should say
paper may be over, but news is not.
Ralph Reed lost this week in his race for the Republican nomination
for lieutenant governor of Georgia. This strikes me as significant
in several ways.
I always thought the question about Mr. Reed is: Is he a Christian
who went into politics, or a politician who went into Christianity?
Was he sincere and driven by a desire to have a positive impact on
public policy, or a mover driven by a desire to get a piece of the
action as American Christians, disaffected from a Democratic Party
that had grown wildly insensitive to, and in fact disdainful of,
their values, started to become a force in the Republican Party?
Maybe one or the other, maybe both, maybe both but to different
degrees.
I once overheard him say to a friend, a year ago, that if "they"
didn't stop him as he ran for his first public office, he would be
"unstoppable." "They" was the political left. He expected a rough
race, but he seemed optimistic. What struck me though was the word
"unstoppable." I realized: He means if he wins, he'll run for
governor and then president. He sounded like a mover. And he didn't
seem sincere, not in any sweet, "this is what I believe" way.
I think he'd grown enamored of being an insider, a top and big-time
operative in Republican politics and within the White House. When
he spoke of the White House, he said "we."
When I first met and interviewed him it was 1994, and he was part
of the Gingrich revolution. He looked like a daguerreotype of one
of the boy generals of the Civil War, his dark hair slicked back
and his collar too big for his neck. But he had an air of
command.
When I read some of the emails he'd sent to lobbyist friends--"I
need some corporations, I need some moolah," that kind of thing--I
thought: Ick. This is a man suffering from a case of advanced
insiderism. This is a guy who thinks it's cool to be cynical.
Anyway, his defeat this week came at the hands not of "them," of
the left, but of conservative voters on the ground in Georgia. His
loss seems to me another sign of one of those quiet changing of the
guards in professional politics. Quietly an older generation
recedes, quietly a newer one rises.
Good. We need new.
Peggy Noonan on Reed this morning. Zing!!!
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245