Jeff Taylor | July 15, 2006
So.
World War IV or just another pointless Middle East dust-up between Israel and her neighbors? Or something in between -- a Falklands or even an Indian subcontinent-sized tussle?
The drone/missile attack on the Israeli ship is a surprising development. But it still seems the key tripwire remains direct Syrian involvement in a fight with Israel.
Should that happen, I'm not real certain where the next stopping point comes. Ideas?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Should that happen, I'm not real certain where the next
stopping point comes. Ideas?
It probably depends on how far Israel wants to take an offensive
into Syria. How long could it sustain an offensive into that
country? Could the Israelis overextend themselves and find
themselves in a bad spot as the Greeks did after they penetrated
too far into Anatolia?
The forces that have escalated the constant tension and violence into a more tense, violent situation are not capable of bringing about peace. As disgusting as the prospect is, a full open war may be the only solution. Aint that what Osama's workin for?
Can we put the Romans in charge of that region again? Granted, they didn't do much for the region, aside from roads, aqueducts, keeping the peace, and sanitation, but at least they united the factions against their common enemy: The Judean People's Front.
I wonder if we're going to be dragged into this, and if so, then how far?
"Should that happen, I'm not real certain where the next
stopping point comes. Ideas?"
The main thing I can see if there's a large scale Israeli ground
assault on Syria is that it will pretty much end the possibility of
a major US military strike on Iran since the highly probable
ensuing collapse of Assad's government would likely lead the US to
move forces into Syria to try to stablize the country.
but at least they united the factions against their common
enemy: The Judean People's Front.
Yeah, the only people we hate more than the Romans are the fucking
Judean People's Front
Iran and Syria could be trying to destabilize the government of
Lebanon by getting Israel do their bidding. It would eliminate a
key U.S. example of democracy and distract global attention away
from Iran's nuclear aspirations.
I do wonder if Iran isn't setting Syria up as a sacrificial lamb
and if Syria is dumb enough to fall for it. Then again, anything is
possible in the name of [insert appropriate god, prophet or profit
here].
There will be a heavy sustained dust storm for a few days, then there will be a break due to atmospheric pressure. This front will blow over by the end of next week.
Iran gets involved, we get dragged in. (Not necessarily unwillingly on the part of the administration). We do airstrikes. Iran sinks a couple oil tankers in the gulf. Oil goes to $150. China announces that it will no longer be lending us money. The Dow sinks 5000 points before they close the NYSE. Bush asks for temporary emergency wartime powers etc.
There will be a heavy sustained dust storm for a few days,
then there will be a break due to atmospheric pressure
Blffft! We don't need you to know which way the wind blows. And we
ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more, neither.
Reg: All right... all right... but apart from better
sanitation and medicine and education and irrigation and public
health and roads and a freshwater system and baths and public
order... what have the Romans done for us?
Xerxes: Brought peace!
Reg: What!? Oh... Peace, yes.... Shut up!
One more reason the U.S. is not the new Rome.
Aren't we the Popular Front?
Maybe we should get together with Turkey, the E.U., Russia, Israel,
the Kurds, and India, and split up the crazier parts of the Middle
East. The heck with all of this pussyfooting.
Or not. I'm not sure what the smart answer is. Maybe stop worrying
about it? It might be easier just to make nice with the oil
producing countries outside of the Middle East and stop caring so
much. For the people who have religious issues with the region, I
just learned that Jesus was born in Birmingham, not Bethlehem. So
we can start looking for his tomb and the True Cross in
England.
Violence erupts in the Mid East. People set on killing each
other.
In other news... Sun disappears beyond Western horizon, reappears
next day in East.
I don't think the U.S. shouldn't get involved because it isn't
our fight... but if I was Isreali I would be all for attacking
Syria, Lebenon, or even Iran. The only reason the Jews in Israel
haven't been exterminated is because they can pretty much kick the
ass of any of their neighbors.
When your neighbors are pretty much 100% dedicated to the
extermination of your people, and when the rest of the world is
already aligned against you because it resonates with popular
anti-semitism (or are we supposed to belive that Russia or France
are upset with Israel because of human rights? Yeah, give me a
break!), well there is absolutly nothing whatsoever to lose from
playing hardball.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I don't
think the U.S. shouldn't get involved because it isn't our fight...
but if I was Isreali I would be all for attacking Syria, Lebenon,
or even Iran. The only reason the Jews in Israel haven't been
exterminated is because they can pretty much kick the ass of any of
their neighbors.
Well stated!
Anybody know how well current events fit with the End Times prophecies? I gotta know if it's time to start draining the wine cellar.
We should wash our hands of the Israeli military aggression and
cut off our tax dollars to them. Bush is obedient dog of the
Israeli government so he won't, but he should, call for a
cease-fire, especially since this war is being prosecuted with our
money. Also, if we make it clear that the introduction of US troops
into this mess is unacceptable to us, perhaps we can forestall yet
more needless US deaths in service to the Israeli government.
We should contact congress:
http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
I don't think the U.S. shouldn't get involved because it
isn't our fight...
This is a typo. I meant to say: I don't thing the U.S. should get
involved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We
should wash our hands of the Israeli military aggression and cut
off our tax dollars to them. Bush is obedient dog of the Israeli
government....
Judenhass types so hate it when Jews fight back!
"The dog is vicious; when attacked, he defends himself."
Seriously whatever your views about this, anyone who picks a bar
fight with Mike Tyson should not wonder why he got the snot beaten
out of him. Nice to know that Rick is to the right of the Saudis on
this one.
Anybody know how well current events fit with the End Times
prophecies?
I was thinking about this and wondering if I should call my mother
(AKA Church Lady) and ask her what should thought. Then I realized
that even if she said "Yes, the world will be ending exactly seven
months, seven days and seven hours from right now" the next thing
she would tell me is that the smoking, drinking and drugs are going
to kill me and I need to think of my kids. This would be said with
no clue of the irony involved.
Amazing. Again, another Justin Raimondo Mideast prediction comes
to fruition! Writing over at antiwar.com, both the most frequented
libertarian site and anti-war site extant, Justin Raimondo
envisioned this Israeli escalation scenario two months ago. Check
out his current column:
Israel Crosses the Line
And you read it here first
http://antiwar.com/justin/
I don't think the U.S. shouldn't get involved because it
isn't our fight...
"This is a typo. I meant to say: I don't thing the
U.S. should get involved." (Emphasis added)
You're 0 for 2, Rex.
To continue Brian's theme....executing a hoax to garner sympathy from the Galactic Senate, Chancellor Palpatine coordinates his own kidnapping. Unaware of the hoax, two brave Jedi knights, determined to rescue the Senator from the evil General Grevious...............
Judenhass types so hate it when Jews fight back!
No. It's a case of; libertarian types hate it when governments make
war with our money. The Israeli government is easily the worst
offender by this count.
Rex. I'm a publisher. I need good proof readers. I could use a guy with you scills.
Hey Rex,
Don't feel bad. I get into cluster typos myself sometimes. Your
point is good anyway.
or are we supposed to belive that Russia or France are upset
with Israel because of human rights? Yeah, give me a
break!
So quick question for Rex. When France sided with Israel vs. Egypt
in '56 what was the reasoning behind that? They're willing to
overlook their anti-Semitism to take the Suez? Or there's a 50 year
delay in anti-Semitism?
This is perfect. Isreal can openly destroy Iran's nucluer capabilities without us having to lift a finger. Makes me think we kidnapped the two soldiers.
Rick Barton,
Exactly who is making war on whom?
It seems to me that Hizbelloh made war on Israel by abducting
Israeli soldiers (who were stationed in Israel) without
provocation. In a small country with compulsory military service,
this is a much bigger deal than it would be elsewhere.
I know you recall that Israel unilaterally withdrew from Southern
Lebanon six years ago. The actions of Hizbollah are a clear case of
unprovoked aggression.
Will you condemn Hizbollah? Or is all your contempt reservered for
Israel?
We should wash our hands of the Israeli military aggression
and cut off our tax dollars to them.
It is the fear of making Americans upset losing those American tax
dollars that has kept Israel so calm for so long. American tax
dollars are the last thing keeping Israel from doing some serious
damange.
Now, as a libertarian, I agree with you about cutting our tax money
off from Israel or any other country... but the only sensible thing
for Israel to do if we cut off our tax dollars to Israel is to
launch a devistating attack against its neighbors while it still
has the advantage.
My only prediction is that we'll soon learn from Thomas Friedman that next six months will be the really crucial ones in the Middle-East. :)
So quick question for Rex. When France sided with Israel vs.
Egypt in '56 what was the reasoning behind that? They're willing to
overlook their anti-Semitism to take the Suez? Or there's a 50 year
delay in anti-Semitism?
The French are not ideologically anti-jewish. They where not going
to lose control of the Suez because of some petty bigotry. Like
most countries, their leaders are amoral and self-interested, and
don't hate Jews any more than they hate anyone else.
But if you are talking about scoring a few cheap points with the
electorate, dissing Israel is a good bet in Europe. It is kind of
like Republicans proposing an anti-gay-marrage amendment that they
know has no chance in hell to pass... it is a token act that will
score a lot of points with the anti-gay crowd.
Likewise, the French people aren't going to make any sacrifices or
any great effort to harm Israel or Jews - but a token statement
condeming Israel plays well with a lot of French people (and
Europeans in general). Condeming Israel (for any reason) just
"feels right" to many Europeans.
When France sided with Israel vs. Egypt in '56 what was the
reasoning behind that?
The same reasoning behind their current postions: money. In '56,
France was the chief supplier of arms to Israel. These days, they
aren't and their economic interests are on the other side.
Any what who...if my stupid neighbors start slinging rockets at my house me and the wife are going of there and fudge them up real good. Get the picture... no damn diplomacy untill they are laying out on the ground.
>>>>>>>>>>>>No. It's a case
of; libertarian types hate it when governments make war with our
money. The Israeli government is easily the worst offender by this
count.
Which is why you claimed the Jewish state was the aggressor because
of their response to a vicious and aggressive provocation, done by
a terrorist group which murdered 242 of our Marines in Beruit back
in 1982, eh?
It's only because Israel takes some of our paper. That's why you're
so angry. Yeah...right.
I don't think the Saudi's are very comfortable with Iran's aggression. Oil prices get too high we find other sources of energy.
This had me laffin so hard I spilled my drink.......
"
It seems to me that Hizbelloh made war on Israel by abducting
Israeli soldiers (who were stationed in Israel) without
provocation. .... "
seems to me, Israel, like the US, is very poorly "led".
"Leaders" there , like here, are rather murderous crackpots.
Im thinkin these Muslims dont view political boundaries as
definitive, rather they see cultural boundaries.
Too friggin often, we become what we fight against. Israel came to
being as a bullet backed option to a murderous strain of bigotry.
The farther elements of Zionist thought see a ....id say "race
based", but most all parties are Semitic, arent they?_ "Greater
Isreal". a militarized State based on religeon. Dont believe in the
same cloud dwelling nasty thug, well, out of here, mate.
As long as Ive been watching this, 30 odd years, every move by
Israel has been to offer Palestinians (i know, i know, they dont
exist.....but there they are anyway) one option: leave.
Post Nixon, theyve been able to back thier offer up with unlimited
US arms & $.
I think theyve shot & bought themselves into a very deep
hole.
And I think thier crackpot "friends" in the US are extremely
grateful, as it pushes forward thier nitwit "crapture" (Ive been
doing some study. It seems, that, like the umpty virgins you are
supposed to get if you die as a martyr- theres a school of thought
its not "virgins" but white raisins-a mistranslation. rather than
ascend into Heaven in a "rapture", True Christians actually turn
into feces.) (They dont believe that gibberish for any kind of
profit, do they?) Leaving US- meaning you
& me- to clean up thier mess. Again.
There's a part of me that desires for all out war. I mean let's pick sides and throw down. World War IV. I mean can we take another gizillion years of "instability"? Let's shed some blood secularists vs. religious nut bags (or holy war who cares?). Were already unpopular with the rest of the world. Let's give those U.N. folks something real to cry about.
Ideas?
Um...how about more insensitive
political/religious satire?
Islam has a sense of humor. Doesn't it?
US wants Israeli war with Syria because of the WMDs supposedly
shipped from Iraq to Syria right before the US invasion in 03. If
that tranfers was true, perhaps they will be used against the
Israelis, thereby justifying Bush and getting Israeli public
opinion fully behind the war. If the WMDs were used agaist US
troops public opinion in the US would force the troops home.
Iran wants this war because they figure the US will eventually
leave the region and they will expand into both Iraq and
Syria.
Russia wants this war because it makes their oil more valuable, and
their islamic nuts are heading south to fight the jews and the
US.
Most of Europe wants this war because they are annoyed with Israel,
the US, and muslims in general.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the little gulf states do not want this
war. Lebanon does not want this war. I don't think China wants this
war.
"done by a terrorist group which murdered 242 of our Marines in
Beruit back in 1982, eh?"
Why does anyone think this counts for anything anymore? We have
full diplomatic relations with the Communist Vietnamese who I seem
to recall killing approximately 57,000 Americans up through 1975.
Does the statute of limitations on stupidity not run out until
after 30 years?
Personally, I've always been two minds of the subject of the
Middle East:
On one hand, I largely agree that the Palestinians have been
getting the shit end of the stick since the West let the Israelis
march in and proclaim that Palestine as "theirs." Furthermore, a
large portion of our own terrorism trouble has to with the fact
we've been giving arms and money to the the Israelis so they can
keep their precious... ahem... "homeland."
As much as I can appreciate the historical plight of the Jewish
people, they lost that land 2000 years ago when they were tossed
out by the Romans. Sorry, finders keepers. Undeservedly being
Western civilization's scapegoat didn't give them the right to take
what doesn't belong to them, I don't care if Israel is the "only
democracy in the region." And spare me the "promised land"
bullshit. As an atheist, Torah bedtime stories starring Abraham and
Moses mean jack shit to me. You're going to come up with better
reasons for grinding Palestinian civilians under the treads of
Merkeva tanks.
(Also, to all those Christian
Zionists out there in the Left Behind crowd who think
we need continue this bloody nonsense to bring the Rapture about,
fuck off you backwoods retards. Even if JEEZ-us was coming
back--that's assuming he ever existed in the first place--he isn't
worth a gorram war.)
On the other hand, Palestinian suicide bombings and targeting
civilians crosses the line. I admit that Hezbollah are a bunch of
slime balls and that the late Yasser Arafat was about as deserving
of the Nobel Peace Prize as Stalin. It's one thing to fight a
government and its army for your freedom. It's quite another to
drag innocents into the fight.
There are no easy answers for this crap. That's why I don't back
either horse in this race.
Will you condemn Hizbollah? Or is all your contempt
reservered for Israel?
I also condemn any initiation of force by Hizbollah, but they don't
get billons of our tax dollars as the Israeli government does.
Our enemies are emboldened through our inability to subdue them. They are like rust, wearing us out. Clerics and warlords shepparding nescient sheep toward the eternal goal of destroying and removing Israel from their holy soil. They have withstood our onslaught, set the world political stage, acquired great wealth and warring material, determined the time is right and embarked on this objective. They need only to withstand Israel�s harshest response then what is left for them to fear?
For a nice view from Beirut on this issue, go to
http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/
No good guys in this fight. Israel is a predictible chump that does
exactly the wrong thing when provoked. Every time.
Which is why you claimed the Jewish state was the aggressor
because of their response to a vicious and aggressive
provocation...
The Israeli government has used this as a pretext to launch an
invasion and start a war, with Iran and Syria as the real targets.
There is strong evidence that this was in the planning for a long
tome. (See: http://antiwar.com/justin/ link from up thread
comment)
...done by a terrorist group...
Terrorism is the victimization of innocent civilians via violence.
The Israeli government is one of the worst terrorist groups in the
region. The Palestinians continue to be their chief victims. The
Israeli government also victimizes the Palestinians with
persecution that may not be ascribed with the T lable, but is
persecution none the less. Many of the thug Arab regimes in the
region also have much blood of innocents on there hands. The
Authoritarian Egyptian and Jordanian regimes also shamefully
receive or tax money. This is a bribe to paid to these torturing
thugs on behalf of the Israeli government for making peace.
...which murdered 242 of our Marines in Beruit back in
1982,
It was disrespectful of our government, and tragic, to put those
Marines in harms way when it wasn't at all necessary for our
national security-rather like the Iraq war, whose chief motivators
had the interest of the Israeli state in mind.
Why do all those American tax dollars go to Israel? Hey, maybe it's because a vast majority of Americans support Israel, and their representatives are doing what us constituents want. Or maybe, just maybe, those clever Jews have somehow tricked us into giving them money. I'll bet I know where Rick Barton comes down on this. It's Protocols time!
Let's demand that our tax money and our military leave the region. What more evidence must we see to heed the wise counsel of the founders of our republic, and avoid these entangling alliances?
Bob,
Sure, when you don't have any real arguments, just insinuate
racism. But I don't think that that tactic is gonna get much
traction around here.
Also, of course political majorities don't necessarily validate
government policy and action.
Son of PL:
Megiddo - Mount Megiddo (Har-megiddo in Hebrew) - Armageddon.
And no, I didn't know that before this thread. The Internet is my
friend.
Rick Barton
Who would bother using arguments against an obvious anti-Semite who
spouts slogans and propaganda? Give me some analysis, and I'll give
you an argument.
Frankly, the whole lot of them suck: the Romans, the Judean People's Front and the People's Front of Judea.
Bob,
That kinda cop-out doesn't cut it. It's my conjecture that you
aren't dealing with the issues cuz you can't.
Frankly, the whole lot of them suck: the Romans, the Judean
People's Front and the People's Front of Judea.
Nice!
Here are some positive steps:
1) No more $ for the Israeli government.
2) No more $ for kleptocrats in the Palestinian Authority.
3) Since a lot of innocent people are caught in a violent mess that
our government helped create, any Israeli, Palestinian, or Lebanese
who wants to get the hell out gets a guaranteed green card after
passing a background check. Historically, immigrants from all of
the ethnic groups involved have (for the most part) done fairly
well in this country. Add in the fact that immigrants are
disproportionately likely to start their own businesses (and hence
create jobs), and this could be a great thing for the US.
It won't fix everything, but it will help.
BRIAN:
Popcorn, Red Hots, Cheeseburgers!
REG:
Got any nuts?
BRIAN:
I haven't got any nuts. Sorry. I've got nachos, chocolate
bars
REG:
No, no, no.
BRIAN:
Red Hots?
REG:
I don't want any of that Yankee rubbish.
JUDITH:
Why don't you sell proper food?
BRIAN:
Proper food?
REG:
Yeah, not those rich imperialist tit-bits.
BRIAN:
Well, don't blame me. I didn't ask to sell this stuff.
REG:
All right. Bag of popcorn, then.
FRANCIS:
Make it two.
REG:
Two.
FRANCIS:
Thanks, Reg.
BRIAN:
Are you the Judean People's Front?
REG:
Fuck off!
thoreau PhD,
Excellent! thoreau for President! Lets put a libertarian physicist
in the White House!
Shem:
Anybody else feel like we're being led around by our collective
noses?
Yep.
As a Jew, I have no idea what's going on and I propose that we wait this out until Israel wins the war. I don't know how big this is going to be, but Israel will most likely win.
I also condemn any initiation of force by Hizbollah, but
they don't get billons of our tax dollars as the Israeli government
does.
Boy, speaking of copouts.
No, Palestine does not get any money from us. But they get money
from everyone else - especially the UN. What does the fact that one
side gets money from us, have ANYTHING to do with choosing a
side?
If we withdrew every dollar, the rest of the middle eastern nations
would take over Israel, and slaughter millions of Jews. Anyone who
doesn't see that is sticking his head in the sand.
TV (Harry)
I demand that we immediately deploy Michael Bay and a battalion
of his best second-unit directors.
'cuz this is gonna get blowed up real good.
When I hear a lot of people talk about what we should do in
regards to Iran, sometimes I wonder if they're not putting the cart
before the horse.
Would Iran flaunt its nuclear program so if we weren't in Iraq?
...I imagine the United States involved in a no win situation like
the Lebanon/Israel conflict--how the hell would we exit something
like that?
Could Iran do something to Iraq like Hezbollah is doing to
Lebanon? If so, then who's the tail and who's the dog? It seems to
me that Iran has a sword dangling over our heads. ...and we have
threats and fist shaking.
One of the few things the UN is good for is as an exit strategy.
I'm not keen on any war unless it's in self-defense, but going into
an elective war without an exit strategy is just plain stupid.
...and no, I don't think waiting for democracy to miraculously
spring forth full bodied from the ground constitutes an exit
strategy.
Anyway, as far as I'm concerned, anyone who thinks we should do
something about Hezbollah needs to account for what that'll do to
our chances of getting out of Iraq. ...and how we're gonna get out
of wherever going after Hezbollah takes us. ...either that or show
that going after Hezbollah would be a war of self-defense.
It's my understading that elements of what became Hezbollah
murdered 241 Americans in 1983. Since then, has Hezbollah targeted
the United States or American citizens directly? ...Does anyone
know?
We should wash our hands of the Israeli military aggression
and cut off our tax dollars to them.
I usually don't say much about Israel, but basically, my opinion is
that I support the state of Israel to whatever extent it's in the
best interest of the United States to do so. ...I feel the same way
about Peru, Denmark, South Korea and Swaziland too.
I think it's time somebody made it really clear again--why
supporting the state of Israel is in the best interest of the
United States. ...because if it isn't in the best interest of the
United States to support Peru or Denmark or South Korea or
Swaziland or Israel, then we shouldn't do it anymore.
Some of you know that I don't think much of anyone who uses
military force to specifically target civilians, but I can see how
it might be in our best interest to support somebody who's willing
to go after terrorist organizations that might be tough or
complicated or costly for us to reach otherwise.
Akira MacKenzie wrote: "As much as I can appreciate the
historical plight of the Jewish people, they lost that land 2,000
years ago when they were tossed out by the Romans. Sorry, finders
keepers."
As much as I can appreciate the historical plight of the
Palestinian people, they lost that land 58 years ago when they were
tossed out by the Jews. Sorry, finders keepers.
Inspector Callahan,
First off. Palestine and Hizbollah are separate entities. BYW,
Hizbollah is not at all popular in Palestine. It doesn't amount to
much but the Palestinian Authority does get our tax dollars.
What does the fact that one side gets money from us, have
ANYTHING to do with choosing a side?
We are, of course, being forced to support which side gets our tax
money. This is unfair.
If we withdrew every dollar, the rest of the middle eastern
nations would take over Israel, and slaughter millions of
Jews.
There is just no evidence for that. Israel is an affluent,
industrialized nation that can take care of itself. The money our
government gives the Israeli government just makes it politically
easier in Israel to maintain a savage occupation of Palestine. One
of the upshots of the occupation is that it endangers the Israeli
people.
Would Iran flaunt its nuclear program so if we weren't in
Iraq?
Of course they would.
Should that happen, I'm not real certain where the next
stopping point comes. Ideas?
an american flag flying over Mecca. Of course one could say that it
was inevitable anyways...
Rick Barton:
Is the following a fair summary of your position?
The Palestinians bear no resposibility for their own plight; they
are entirely the victims of vicious Israeli aggression. Palestinian
suffering has no equal anywhere in the world. Israel is the most
brutal occupier in the world today. Repressive Arab regimes are
propped up by the Israel-controlled U.S.government only in return
for making peace with Israel. Nothing really, really bad ever
happens in the world that Mossad isn't behind. If it weren't for
Israel, 9/11 would never have happened, and we wouldn't be in Iraq.
Radical Islamists hate us only because of our support for Israel.
So much of our tax money goes to Israel because Israel has a
disproportionate influence on the American government. If Israel
ceased to exist as a Jewish state, Jews currently living there
could live in peace and security with an Arab majority.
As long as you always say Israel and never use the term "Jewish"
when describing the extraordinary evil that Israel represents in
the world, none of these views can be construed as anti-Semitic. In
any case Israel is the most raicst country on earth. Have I got the
line down, Rick?
-I repeat myself-
I may be suffering from compassion fatigue. I am beginning to think
this situation is what the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive self
interest is all about [if it's about anything, it should be about
stuff like this]. We should go down to the armament basement, dust
off the neutron bombs, load them into B-2s, and drop them on Israel
and the surrounding territories. We'll say, for starters, a thirty
mile radius of Jerusalem. Repeat as necessary.
I shall now don my tin chapeau and await the Godwin Ordnance and
other varieties of abuse.
--------
If Jews in Bolivia, or Iceland, or Ulan Bator were treated the way
Palestinian Israeli citizens are treated in Israel, we would be
hearing cries for military intervention from all corners of the
globe. Anybody who says that this "kidnap" raid came, unprovoked,
out of the clear blue sky needs to spend a little more time keeping
up with the news of the world.
I have no strong feelings either way about the continued existence
of Israel, at this point. It might be a lot cheaper and easier for
us if Israel ceased to exist. Same for "Palestine."
Akira said:
"On one hand, I largely agree that the Palestinians have been
getting the shit end of the stick since the West let the Israelis
march in and proclaim that Palestine as "theirs." "
There are some very interesting details about how the Israelis
purchased their land in Palestine at
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Arabs_in_Palestine.html
Here's an example:
The Jews were paying exorbitant prices to wealthy landowners for
small tracts of arid land. "In 1944, Jews paid between $1,000 and
$1,100 per acre in Palestine, mostly for arid or semiarid land; in
the same year, rich black soil in Iowa was selling for about $110
per acre."
Note the year.
P Brooks-
Do you always exaggerate on just on this topic? Israeli Palestinian
citizens are certainly subject to discrimination, but they attend
universities and elect members to the Israeli parliament. They're
hardly receiving the sort of treatment that would call for military
intervention. Maybe you're confusing them with Palestinians in the
occupied territories.
Seems to me this is just what the Bush Administration ordered.
Their M.E. doctrine is failing. Polling numbers are abysmal. What
to do? What to do?
Hey! If we get our buddies in Israel to provoke a major war in the
region we can jump in and finish the job. Take over Iran. Take over
Syria. Button up the whole region.
We control the oil. Israel controls the region. Win/win.
The same reasoning behind their current postions: money. In
'56, France was the chief supplier of arms to Israel. These days,
they aren't and their economic interests are on the other
side.
That was precisely my point. Economic self-interest rather than
racist nose-thumbing is the reason behind their position.
In fact, I don't think it's in American interests for a war between
Syria, Iran and Israel to break out. A global depression from a
huge jump in oil prices will cause signficant damage and further
reduce stability. I know realism is often scorned, but many times
it's the best of many bad choices.
"Terrorism is the victimization of innocent civilians via
violence."
While certainly deplorable behavior, this is no definition of
terrorism I've ever heard. Terrorism is the victimization of
civilians in order to cause widespread terror among them,
hence the name. Israel is not a terrorist state because its
violence is aimed (however haphazardly) at targets of military or
strategic importance, rather than weddings and random buses. Much
as I deplore some Israeli policies, it is clear Israel does not
remotely deserve the label of terrorism.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Who would bother
using arguments against an obvious anti-Semite who spouts slogans
and propaganda? Give me some analysis, and I'll give you an
argument. <<br />
I sympathize with your sentiments. I did feel I had to say
something. I have my own ideas on why so many Libertarians loathe
the Jewish state. I said them earlier and I got quite a
response.
Rex Rhino,
If you were indeed correct then Le Pen should have won the 2002
French Presidential election. If you actually paid attention to
French politics you'd realize that the anti-semites in France lose
the elections there. *groan*
Mo,
Irrational France bashing is a hobby for some people.
I found a song which should be dedicated to Rick Barton. The hilariously funny 'People's Cube' dedicated it to that evil Kos writer who speaks for many Libertarians.
Imagine there's no Israel (inspired by the Progressive Daily
Koz)
by John Lennon and Laika the space dog
Imagine there's no Israel
It's easy if you try
No Jews around us
Why can't they all just die
Imagine all the Hebrews
Pushed into the sea...
Imagine there's no America
It isn't hard to do
No right-wing freedoms
And no Bushies too
Imagine all the hippies
Living life in dhimmi...
CHORUS:
You may say I'm a schemer
But I'm for progress of mankind
Life could be so much simpler
If some people would just die
Imagine no possesions
Communism can....
Nobody has to be workin'
In a big collective of man
We'll satisfy our needs
By stealing all the wealth...
CHORUS:
You may say I'm a schemer
But I'm for progress of mankind
Life could be so much simpler
If some people would just die
If Jews in Bolivia, or Iceland, or Ulan Bator were treated
the way Palestinian Israeli citizens are treated in Israel, we
would be hearing cries for military intervention from all corners
of the globe.
Since Palestinians are not Israeli citizens, I suppose you really
mean "Israeli Arabs." You know, the ones who have full civil
rights, exemption from military service, and serve in the
Knesset.
Phil Lip,
You know, I think you're right. After all, didn't that Jean Bart
fellow have a Jewish wife? ;-)
Wait, so how did this war start? Was it a few soldiers being kidnapped in a period of a few weeks? Were the rocket attacks before or after the invasion and bombing?
Since Palestinians are not Israeli citizens, I suppose you really mean "Israeli Arabs." You know, the ones who have full civil rights, exemption from military service, and serve in the Knesset.
This whole arab palestinian thing is a fraud. It's an advertising device cooked up to smear the Jews as aggressors
In light of this, the egyptian born pederast, Yasser Arafat, is a perfect symbol of the arab Palestinians: phony, perverted and absolutely evil.
If Jews in Bolivia, or Iceland, or Ulan Bator were treated
the way Palestinian Israeli citizens are treated in Israel, we
would be hearing cries for military intervention from all corners
of the globe. Anybody who says that this "kidnap" raid came,
unprovoked, out of the clear blue sky needs to spend a little more
time keeping up with the news of the world.
The Israelis of Arab origin, constituting 10% of the population,
are treated no worse than, say, North Africans in France. Probably
better, because, since their labor is needed so much, there is less
discrimination.
Akira MacKenzie wrote: "As much as I can appreciate the historical plight of the Jewish people, they lost that land 2,000 years ago when they were tossed out by the Romans. Sorry, finders keepers."
As much as I can appreciate the historical plight of the Palestinian people, they lost that land 58 years ago when they were tossed out by the Jews. Sorry, finders keepers.
Comment by: D.E. Cloutier at July 15, 2006 11:58 PM
That is a fair point, Mr. Cloutier. I guess I would say that a
property deed from 58 years ago might carry at least a little more
weight than a property deed from 2000+ years ago.
More importantly, finders should be responsible for doing their own
keeping. There's no reason why we should be paying for some other
keeper to defend what they found. Israel is, at this point, a
developed country with an advanced military. They should be
responsible for their own defense. If their economy isn't quite up
to the task of maintaining their defense, then they should
implement more market-based reforms so that they can reap the
benefits of greater prosperity. They shouldn't ask us to pick up
the slack created by their economic policies.
We, in turn, should do them the favor of not sending another cent
to the kleptocrats in the Palestinian Authority.
And since we bear at least some measure of responsibility for the
mess in Israel, the Palestinian areas, and Lebanon, we should offer
green cards to anybody from those areas who passes a background
check. Given that immigrants from all of the relevant groups have
(for the most part) done pretty well for themselves in the US, I
figure that this would be a net boon to us. Immigrants, especially
immigrants from the more successful groups, are disproportionately
likely to start their own businesses, creating jobs and
prosperity.
Really, what's not to love in my proposal?
About Rick Barton and anti-semitism:
I freely grant that the policies of the Israeli government, and our
government's support of those policies, is one of Rick Barton's pet
political issues. I freely admit that Rick Barton is an extremely
harsh critic of the Israeli government, and the way that the
Israeli government treats Palestinians.
I freely admit that Rick Barton is an extremely harsh critic of
political organizations that lobby the US government on behalf of
the Israeli government. (Note that some of those organizations
receive considerable support from evangelical Christians, people
who could never, ever, ever be mistaken for Jews.)
However, Rick Barton has always restricted his criticisms to
certain governments, their policies, and organized lobbying groups.
He has never engaged in any guilt by association. He has always
drawn a distinction between Jews in general and the specific people
who actively and voluntarily support certain policies and join
certain lobbying groups.
What if, for the sake of argument, I were to criticize our
government's relationship with the House of Saud? What if I were to
suggest that the House of Saud enjoys undue influence in
Washington, and engages in unsavory practices? Would anybody think
that I simply hate Arabs and Muslims? Or would people recognize
that I am criticizing a government, the policies of that
government, and the organizations that lobby the US government on
behalf of that foreign government?
Rick Barton has also been critical of US aid to the Palestinian
Authority and the governments of Egypt and Jordan. And I assume
that Rick Barton is also critical of the House of Saud and our
government's cozy relationship with them.
Conclusion: Rick Barton is not a bigot. He may have a much harsher
opinion of certain governments than other people on this forum
might have, but he is not a bigot.
If we can put aside our hatreds of this and that group, nation
etc we might see what has been apparent to some political
observers, most recently
Gary Hart: our invasion of Iraq was ill advised and it gave Iran
the position of top dog. Previously, with that fascist evil Saddam
in charge of Iraq, there had been a countervailing force in the
region. There no lon ger is one. Syria is a minor player alongside
Iran, and not by chance Iran president noted that an attack on
Syria would beget war from all the Muslim nations. Well, not
exactly so.
There is Egypt and Jordan as moderates, and Syria seems most
reluctant to be drawn in. It is IRAN that is trying to control the
fertile crescent and impost Islamic law and rule. We can cut all
aid to Israel, or help them, but in either case, we have to deal
with a growing force in the region: Iran. We helped them gain this
status and stature, and now we must in some way change this
situation and of course without going to war, if possible. Why? Ask
the next time you fill your gas tank.
Rather than import the Israelians, Palestinites and Lebanonians, we should arrange for them all to go to Mexico. We get tons of Mexican immigrants. They can take these. Put them on the Baja Peninsula until it fills up. Lots of unocupied land there.
Thoreau - "What if I were to suggest that the House of Saud
enjoys undue influence in Washington, and engages in unsavory
practices? Would anybody think that I simply hate Arabs and
Muslims?"
Actually, yes. Not myself, but there are those that would believe
your position stemmed from Arabaphobia.
Thoreau:
Rick Barton believes Israel masterminded 9/11 and that Bin Laden is
an American asset. That goes beyond harsh criticism into the area
of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Ever heard of ZOG? I'll bet
Rick Barton has. If he isn't a bigot,he does a very good imitation
of one.
Regarding the notion that Israel should be left to defend
herself absent US aid of any sort, I submit that we haven't seen an
Israel that truly feared for its own existence in a long time. With
Iran and Syria supplying the extremist elements, a completely
isolated Israel would quite understandably take the gloves off.
Payments to Israel have historically been to keep them out of a
mode of thinking that they are truly at risk of losing it all
because we don't really want them to fight as hard as they
can.
I'm all for the idea of each state defending itself, but you really
have to wonder what that would look like.
"The past week's events in the Middle East have a disturbing feel of July 1914 about them." - Spengler
Jason-
That's a fair point. Several years ago I told a friend of mine that
we should withdraw aid to Israel. I was prepared for him to say
that it would be awful for Israel. He surprised me by saying that
it would just make our image problem even worse, because Israel
would take the gloves off and we would be blamed for not holding
them back.
I still lean strongly toward the course of action that I proposed,
but I admit that I'm not 100% on it.
Another question:
Suppose I said that, while I'm all in favor of the Kurds doing
whatever they want, if they want a fully independent state (which
would be more likely to incite a regional war than the
quasi-independent region they govern) then they should take full
responsibility for their own security?
Would anybody accuse me of harboring ethnic prejudice against
Kurds?
"Rick Barton believes Israel masterminded 9/11 and that Bin
Laden is an American asset. That goes beyond harsh criticism into
the area of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Ever heard of ZOG?
I'll bet Rick Barton has. If he isn't a bigot,he does a very good
imitation of one.
Comment by: Joe at July 16, 2006 10:38 AM"
Fakt?
Hey Joe - whyn't yooo and Steven go screw the same onion.
You're just like those pc types back in college who threw out
"racist" whenever they couldn't deal.
Here are some steps for you
1) actually read what Rick says
2) actually understand the issues and not just be a keyboard tough
guy
3) make a call to the aforementioned onion.
Rick criticizes the israeli governemnt. He is not speaking about
Judaism at all. He's talking about a political entity, not a
cultural or religious one.
Being against the political actions of a government is not being
against the culture. Or do you actually hate america when you
criticize GW Bush?
Being pro Labour and its work until the mid 90s under Y. Rabin (RIP
- a great man who will be missed) and being totally against his
successor Ben Netanyahu, a Likud hardliner, is an example of this,
no? But in your color-by-numbers world, you have to blindly be in
favor of both, right? That is fucking stoopid.
But then again, Joe (if that is indeed your real name), since
you're obviously reading his mind, I guess you knew that.
Remember - first deal with your own prejudicisms. Then reread what
Rick has written. Then you can feel free to apologize... Or aren't
you quite tough enough for that?
In regards to Mr. Barton, if I understand his position
correctly, he seems concerned that we launched the Iraq War in
pursuit of Israeli interests and counter to the interests of the
United States. ...given what little good the Iraq War seems to have
done the United States, particularly in regards to the War on
Terror, I think there's a legitimate argument to be made for that.
Now that isn't my argument, but I don't see anything inherently
anti-Semitic about the argument itself. The war wasn't in out best
interest--acknowledge that and it's only natural to speculate about
why we went then.
But the Iraq War was one thing; Israel doing its level best to
decimate Hezbollah and Hamas is another thing entirely. ...and
along the lines of my comment on July 15 at 11:35 PM, I'd be
interested in whether Mr. Barton recognizes that. ...that although
the interests of the US and Israel may not have coincided in the
Iraq War, they may coincide exactly in these cases.
Indeed, if the War on Terror means that Hamas and Hezbollah have to
go, might it not be better for the United States if Israel did all
the heavy lifting? Might it not be better if this means the United
States doesn't get involved directly in yet another nasty elective
war?
Thoreau:
If you claimed that Kurds (through their state, of course) were
involved in various farfetched conspiracies to advance their evil
aims in the world, A Kurd migh be forgiven for regarding you as an
anti-Kurdish racist. Why is it always the Jews who play the leading
role in such racist fantasies?
Our defense budget is approximately $440b. The $10b we give to
Israel (much of it returned buying our stuff) buys us a footprint
in the region and a formidable military/intelligence gathering
force with like objectives. We defend ourselves outside our borders
so we can lesson the consequences to our citizens unlike
Haifa.
It allows the freedom to pontificate and jabber here and in coffee
shops while the few, the proud, do the tough work.
This ain't your grandma's earth. And NO, "we can't just get
along"
Interesting piece by Fisk. The MidEast has been his beat for 30
years. His reporting causes mass hysteria among the crackpot right
& the Crapture nitwits.
Ive been readin his stuff- ten years, anyway. Rarely is he off the
mark, I would recommend you look him up, read his past work &
see who is more accurate: the US MSM & nutbars, or
Robert....
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14006.htm
I think I am more optimistic about Dr T's plan that he is.
Side benefit: Lots of hot new Arab and Jewish chicks on the
market.
I think alot of these problems in the middle east would be
solved if everyone over there had air conditioning
(average high in Baghdad from beginning of May to end of
October=102 ).
I'd go apeshit too if I lived there.
The weather in LA's been hot as hell lately--and I'm by the beach. So are you in Jordan now kwais? ...If I can ask.
Bob:
Rick Barton:
Is the following a fair summary of your position?
The Palestinians bear no resposibility for their own plight;
they are entirely the victims of vicious Israeli
aggression.
Entirely?? The Palestinian people's current plight is mostly due to
the Israeli government's brutal occupation of their land. It
started with a particularly murderous ethnic cleansing of 750,000
of them upon the founding of the Israeli state.
The leaders of the Palestinian people who have been in power have
often been ineffectual or corrupt or in cahoots with the Israeli
government or all three. (see: How Israel Lost: The Four Questions
by Richard Ben Cramer)
How much of the plight of the victims of the Soviet occupation of
Eastern Europe do you think that the Eastern Europeans themselves
were responsible for?
Palestinian suffering has no equal anywhere in the
world.
That's ridiculous.
Israel is the most brutal occupier in the world
today.
It's a shamefully brutal occupation that we should not be paying
for. But the worst in the world? What about the Occupation of
Tibet?
Repressive Arab regimes are propped up by the Israel-controlled
U.S. government only in return for making peace with
Israel.
As I said, this is true only of Egypt and Jordan. However, our
government does foolishly and unethically prop up other repressive
regimes with our money.
Nothing really, really bad ever happens in the world that
Mossad isn't behind.
You just wish I believed that crap.
If it weren't for Israel, 9/11 would never have happened and we
wouldn't be in Iraq.
There is heavy evidence that the Israeli government had prior
knowledge of the 9/11 attacks, but not that they had any role in
the planning or facilitation of them:
http://www.antiwar.com/israeli-files.php
However, in view of the evidence that they possessed fore-knowledge
of the attacks, any role of the Israeli government in their
facilitation should not be outside the purview of enquiry.
I think that it's for sure that if it wassn't for Israel, we
wouldn't be in Iraq.
Radical Islamists hate us only because of our support for
Israel.
The evidence is that radical Islamists are motivated to attack us
cuz of our government's hyper-interventionist foreign policy in the
mideast, of which our support of the Israeli government's
occupation is a key and likely most important factor.
Note that Scandinavian is the chief exporter of pornography into
the Arab world. The Mullahs complain bitterly, but of course there
are no terror attacks on Stockholm or Copenhagen. It's our
government's interventionist ways that are the problem for
us.
So much of our tax money goes to Israel because Israel has a
disproportionate influence on the American government
Vis a Vis our government's foreign policy, that is certainly
true.
If Israel ceased to exist as a Jewish state, Jews currently
living there could live in peace and security with an Arab
majority.
I don't feel like exploring all of the dynamics, but arguments of
peace and security are part of the case for of a one-state
solution.
As long as you always say Israel and never use the term
"Jewish" when describing the extraordinary evil that Israel
represents in the world, none of these views can be construed as
anti-Semitic.
To blame Jews in general for the actions of the Israeli government
and its supporters is ridiculous, unfair, and racist. Governments
all over the world do hideous things with regularity.
In any case Israel is the most raicst country on earth.
There are policies of the Israeli government that are certainly
racist. The Jewish fundamentalist religious nut-balls, who
currently influence Israeli polity in a toxic way, push things in a
racist direction. However, to say that Israel is the most racist
country on earth is silly and without foundation.
BTW, the new Iraqi government has adapted racist, anti-Jewish
provisions in its laws- Our tax dollars at work...
Shoulda been:
Bob:
In any case Israel is the most raicst country on
earth.
There are policies of the Israeli government that are certainly
racist. The Jewish fundamentalist religious nut-balls, who
currently influence Israeli polity in a toxic way, push things in a
racist direction. However, to say that Israel is the most racist
country on earth is silly and without foundation.
BTW, the new Iraqi government has adapted racist, anti-Jewish
provisions in its laws- Our tax dollars at work...
THE BARTON SONG
(sung to the tune of "The Dreidel Song")
We are the Jewish people
who post on Hit and Run
but damn that old Rick Barton
he spoils all our fun.
Oh Barton, Barton, Barton,
Why do you hate us so?
Barton, Barton, Barton,
to hell we hope you go.
(Just kidding, Rick! If I really thought you were anti-Semitic I
wouldn't be cute about it.)
By the way, you can dislike Israel without being
anti-Jewish, just like you can be dislike Italy without being
anti-Catholic.
Ken,
I am near Tikrit. But I have been in Jordan from Baghdad a few
times. The weather has always been awesome.
I'm still not sure what to think about this war, but I just saw a picture on CNN showing some Lebanese men helping a girl who was injured by the latest Israeli missiles. I was surprised to see that she was dressed just like a Western woman--snug-fitting jeans, short-sleeved scooped-neck top, and uncovered hair. Between our invasion of Iraq and Israel's of Lebanon, I can't help but wonder: why the hell are we and our allies fighting fundamentalist Islam by bombing the shit out of secular Islamists?
thoreau, VM, Ken Schultz, Jennifer,
Thank you guys for coming to my defense with your arguments of
logic and reasoning. It means so much to me. I'm really
touched.
Jennifer, Ah yes, you reprised your Barton/Dreidel Song! It's
adorable. I love it!
I can only answer Jennifer by thinking that: Israel actually believes in its (highly immoral) idea that by bombing the secular Lebanese they will induce them to take care of the fundie nutjobs in the area OR that Israel would love to see the secularists in Lebanon go under (that way their enemies will look worse to the world and the US). Secularists, Christians, and just generally innocent folks are being murdered in Lebanon now by a fanatically militaristic government all the while being supported by ignorant rapture believing Bible thumpers who think Israel is the chosen people and therefore must have our support no matter how inhumane they act. It's heartbreaking.
Couldn't they just settle this the way civilized nations do... with penalty kicks?
Ken... or perhaps they're trying to cut off Hezbollah's supply, mobility, and communications (Tim, please note, my butt is still tattoo-free). This has not exactly been an all-out assault on Lebanese, especially not the secular Lebanese; more people died in one second in India (or Spain) at the hands of Hezbollah's brethren than have died in 5 days of this "racist" campaign.
Between our invasion of Iraq and Israel's of Lebanon, I
can't help but wonder: why the hell are we and our allies fighting
fundamentalist Islam by bombing the shit out of secular
Islamists?
One of my criticisms of the democracy as the ultimate solution to
the problems of the Middle East thing has to do with what
proponents of the theory would have us do when the locals
legitimately vote in terrorist organizations. Innocents get caught
in the middle of every war, and that's a tragedy. ...and I don't
mean to diminish that tragedy, but if we really do need to go after
these terrorist organizations, especially when they're in countries
where terrorists have been legitimized with elections, then
innocents will get caught in the middle.
...but I don't understand why you seem to differentiate between
Islamist and secular innocents. I don't care if every nation in the
Middle East is run by Islamists--so long as they don't engage in
terrorism.
Are we fighting fundamentalist Islam? Terrorism is not fundamental
to Islam. Fundamentalist Islam isn't the problem--terrorism is the
problem. People in the Middle East should feel free to practice
fundamentalist Islam as they see fit.
...People in the United States should be free to practice
fundamentalist Islam as they see fit.
People in the Middle East should feel free to practice
fundamentalist Islam as they see fit.
Do you see a problem with that? "As they see fit" means that they
want to destroy the freedom of others to do as they see fit? 25
people were murdered today in Iraq because they had a different
view of a 1500 year old historical event- or worse, just happened
to be in an area where people had that different view of
history.
Do you see a problem with that?
I thought I qualified that by writing that terrorism isn't
fundmantal to Islam, but, on further refection, I suppose I should
have written, "People should be free to practice fundamentalist
Islam--they just shouldn't be free to practice terrorism."
Terrorism isn't fundamental to Christianity either. ...and
Christians should also feel free to practice fundmental
Christianity as they see fit--but they shouldn't be free to set off
bombs.
...and I still don't think we should qualify victims as innocent or not based on whether they're wearing a burka. ...or whether they're fundamentalists.
You got half my point. The other half is "they should be free to practice fundamentalist xxx as long as fundamentalist xxx practice does not include insistance on the dominance of fundamentalist xxx over everyone else."
I'm afraid I still don't get the other half of your point.
People shouldn't be free to target civilians specifically and
murder them in the pursuit of some political goal. ...whether
they're fundamentalist Christians of Muslims or something
else.
They shouldn't be allowed to molest children or steal money from
people or unilaterally void contracts or anything else smacking of
coercion. Still, people should be able to practice their religion
as they see fit. ...fundamentalists too.
I don't care if the Middle East is chock full of fundamentalists,
but I care very much if its full of terrorist threats to the
American people. ...and fundamentalists and terrorists are not the
same thing. What am I missing here?
Rick,
Why is our monetary support of Israel special? The US directly or
indirectly supports most of the world with our tax dollars--think
oil distribution and our protection of "trade routes". Would you
support bringing our troops home from every nation in which they
are stationed? Would you support the use of our military might only
to ensure that our vital trade routes are protected?
Personally, I support Israel; I do so openly with bias--I am biased
toward Jews. Although I am not a Jew, I think that Jews, on
average, are superior to most if not all other ethnicities; thus, I
value their existence more than most if not all other ethnicities.
(I guess I'm an odd goy with a minor Jew fetish?)
"What am I missing here?"
The concept that one should not be able to use the force of arms
(whether terrorist or state) to compel others to follow your form
of fundamentalism. Unfortunately, the modern concept of
fundamentalist Islam does require such a thing, and that's the
basis of the violence in Sudan, India, Kashmir, Pakistan, Thailand,
Philippines, Iraq, Lebanon...
Criticism of Israel is legitimate, and lots of Jews as well as
non-Jews indulge in it for legitimate reasons of conviction. One
can criticize Israel even out of a love of Israel. Some
unscrupulous defenders of Israel try to portray any criticism of
Israel as anti-Semitic, which is nonsense.
But some anti-Semites do embrace anti-Zionism as a vehicle for
pushing conspiracy theories that demonize Israel as a way of
demonizing Jews, while indignantly denying any racist intent. It's
a rare anti-Semite these days who claims that all Jews are
responsible for the evil that the Jewish cabal does. It's always
just the Jewish zionists(or capitalists, or communists) who are the
conspirators, but the conspiracy ends up casting a shadow of doubt
on all Jews. One has to examine the "theories" and look at the
"evidence" that is put forward before throwing around accusations
of anti-Semitism. Most legitimate criticism has some balance. If
all the "evidence" confirms the conspiracy, it's a tell-tale sign
that something other than honest criticism is at work.
BTW Rick,
I accused you of antisemitism in the past (quite harshly, I'm
ashamed to admit). I no longer believe you to be antisemitic (and
so, I apologize), but I do think that some of your "allies", such
as Raimondo, are antisemites (which is the nicest word I'd use to
describe him).
"There is heavy evidence that the Israeli government had prior
knowledge of the 9/11 attacks, but not that they had any role in
the planning or facilitation of them:"
Heavy would be an overstatement.
"Some suggestion that..." would cover it more accurately.
Here's a typical example of a known anti-Semite's take on
Israel's alleged involvement in 9/11. No mention at all of "all
Jews."
Ariel Sharon: The terrorist behind the 9-11 Attack!
By David Duke
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=114
I'm having a hell of a time concentrating on work since my boss has the TV on a news channel showing nothing but scenes from Lebanon. I just saw what looked like a street of residential apartments; the buildings are still standing but sustained enough damage to be now unlivable. Concerning their now-homeless former residents, I wonder how many were anti-Israel sympathizers before, versus how many are now?
The concept that one should not be able to use the force of
arms (whether terrorist or state) to compel others to follow your
form of fundamentalism.
I didn't think I needed to define so many terms, but when I talked
about fundamentalism, and that people should feel free to be
fundamentalists, I was referring to belief in the authenticity and
truth of whatever religious text, for instance, rather than any
particular political current within Islam.
I know some Christian fundamentalists. They believe that the Bible
tells them how they should live their lives and that someday Jesus
is going to return in a cloud of glory... They're almost as sure of
that as you are that the sun will rise in the east tomorrow
morning. ...and they should be free to believe that, and they
should be free to live their lives in accordance with the way they
read the Bible. When I say that and call them fundamentalists, I
don't mean that they want to bomb abortion clinics and should be
free to do so.
Another distinction I could have and maybe should have made is that
I've been talking primarily about military policy. Do I care if the
Middle East goes completely fundamentalist? ...I'd rather it didn't
actually, but in terms of military policy, I won't support a war to
rid the Middle East of fundamentalist Islam. I might support a war
to rid the Middle East of terrorist threats to the United
States--if that's really achievable and the cost/benefit analysis
works. ...with the loss of both American and civilian life given a
heavy weight on the cost side of that analysis.
I don't think I've ever seen a cost/benefit analysis that worked
for me unless the war was in self-defense. The life on the cost
side is always too high. ...and yeah, I count fundamentalist lives
as a cost too.
Jennifer,
Maybe a few more? I have the feeling (no proof of course) that the
majority of the world's Muslims are anti-Israel. (Not all Lebanese
are Muslim, but I doubt that most of the non-Muslim Lebanese have
any great love for Israel or Jews in general).
"perhaps they're trying to cut off Hezbollah's supply, mobility,
and communications "
But are they doing that? Israel actually stated that part of their
motivation is to make life miserable for the mostly secular,
Westernized government whom they "hold responsible" for the actions
of Hizbollah. To trade off on people's lives like this (killing X
to make Y and Z do something about bad guy A) is immoral.
"Why is our monetary support of Israel special?"
Because said support is largely unqualified and Israel tops the
list of per capita support by quite a lot. They get this support
despite the fact that our allegiance with them (which on some level
I support, but in a qualified way) is not in our best national
interest (unlike other recipients, like Turkey, which we gain by
supporting).
There is another side to the Big Brother metaphor besides
snooping. It is that He can fulfill your desire for war.
Recall, I'm an anarchist.
I want to have Big Brother removed as an option for all the Little
Brothers out there in the world.
BTW, by genetics, I'm a fighting Irishman, but, over time, I have
morphed into a peace-maker who loves everybody.
As much as I can appreciate the historical plight of the
Palestinian people, they lost that land 58 years ago when they were
tossed out by the Jews. Sorry, finders keepers.
Comment by: D.E. Cloutier at July 15, 2006 11:58 PM
So by that rational, we ought to give the Dakota's back to the
Sioux, the North East to the Iroquois Confederation, and Spain back
to the Basque. What makes the Jew's claim (who hadn't control the
region in over 2000 years prior to the establishment of Israel) to
the land more valid than the Palestinians?
At the very least tell why us the US has to paint a huge target on
it's back for every Islamic terror group just because we want one
particular religious group to control Palestine?
THE BARTON SONG
(sung to the tune of "The Dreidel Song")
We are the Jewish people
who post on Hit and Run
but damn that old Rick Barton
he spoils all our fun.
...
Isn't that sweet.
The person named Jennifer (anti-Semite? self hater?) prints a song ridiculing the Jews and the religion of Judaism in response to me copying a song that ridicules Rick Barton's secular religion of anti-Semitism.
HEY! MORAL EQUIVALENCE!
I wrote:
"Terrorism is the victimization of innocent civilians via
violence."
Nathan responded:
...Terrorism is the victimization of civilians in order to
cause widespread terror among them, hence the name. Israel is not a
terrorist state because its violence is aimed (however haphazardly)
at targets of military or strategic importance, rather than
weddings and random buses. Much as I deplore some Israeli policies,
it is clear Israel does not remotely deserve the label of
terrorism.
You're defining terrorism, using as a criteria the intent of the
aggressors. I don't think that that criteria makes any sense. If
innocent civilians have been the targets, then terrorism has been
committed. Also, the Israeli government has targeted innocent
civilian with violence plenty of times the occupied Palestine-Both
as an incentive for action or inaction (which is consistent with
tor criteria) as well as collective punishment. I believe that
since the start of the last Intafada, there have been more
Palestinian children killed than total Israelis killed. I can't
think of any reason why the Israeli government should not be
classed as a terrorist state.
hoo boy-
The fact that Barton repeated the incredibly stupid claim that
Israel, one of our strongest allies, deliberately failed to inform
of us 9/11 means that I can stop listening to him.
The only good Raimondo supporter is a...
On Israeli government racism:
The Sharon government actually supported racist "Jews Only" housing
laws on government land in Israel in open discrimination against
the country's 10-20% Arab population
http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1779
To understand the background of the racist, fundamentalist Jewish
religious extremism that Israeli polity is currently gripped by,
see the fascinating: "Jewish History, Jewish Religion" by Israel
Shahak and also Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel by Shahak and
Norton Mezvinsky. Shahak was a non-leftist human rights activist
and a a Nazi concentration camp survivor.
http://tinyurl.com/ao495
Because said support is largely unqualified and Israel tops
the list of per capita support by quite a lot.
This is official, direct support, which doesn't in any way address
the issue of indirect support or other military support. For
example, we have thousands of troops in South Korea. How much does
that cost us per Korean?
They get this support despite the fact that our allegiance with
them (which on some level I support, but in a qualified way) is not
in our best national interest (unlike other recipients, like
Turkey, which we gain by supporting).
Well, this is your opinion and, of course, you are entitled to it.
IMO, I think supporting Israel is in my interest (as an American)
and supporting Turkey is not. (I prefer the Kurds.)
Well, Rick, IMO Israeli government racism against Arabs is a
natural result of centuries of Arab and Muslim racism against
Jews.
I don't think either group's racism is "right," but I do think that
Israelis are not totally irrational for distrusting Arabs and
Muslims in general. Put it this way: Who's been oppressing who for
the longest?
Jews oppressing Muslim Arabs: ~58 years
Muslim Arabs oppressing Jews: >1000 years
Steven:
I have my own ideas on why so many Libertarians loathe the
Jewish state.
That's just it. It's only the Israeli state that's
the problem. I think that there's lots to like about Israeli
society. The Jewish fundamentalists would be but an annoyance if
they didn't influence the Israeli government to the ex5ent that
they do.
Anti-Genitle fundamentalism is unquestionably a feature of a small group of ultra-Orthodox Jews. The vast majority of religious Jews do not subscribe to this fundamentalism. Anti-Arab policies in Israel have much more to do with secular nationalism and the Arab-Israeli conflict than with fundamentalist Judaism. Anti-Arab sentiment among Israelis is hardly stronger than anti-Jewish sentiment among Arabs. Egypt and other Arab countries regularly broadcast and publish the most primitive anti-Semitic propaganda, mostly from western source. Hamas quotes from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in its charter. Any balanced account of the role of racism in the Arab-Israel conflict has to take Arab racism as well as israeli racism into account.
In the introduction to their book on Jewish fundamentalism,
Shahak and Mezvinsky wrote:
"We realize that by criticizing Jewish fundamentalism we are
criticizing a part of the past that we love. We wish that members
of every human grouping would criticize their own past, even before
criticizing others."
They probably realized the purposes to which their honest book
could be put.
"This is official, direct support, which doesn't in any way
address the issue of indirect support or other military
support."
You're right Bill, this doesn't even begin to take into account the
money sent to Israel by American private supporters as well as
indirect support like the insane record of UN Security Council
vetos the U.S. uses, often by itself in opposition to the rest of
the world, in order to keep Israel from becoming a repeat
International felon.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/usvetoes.html
"Well, this is your opinion and, of course, you are entitled to it.
IMO, I think supporting Israel is in my interest (as an American)
and supporting Turkey is not. "
Well, I was using interest in the sense that Washington did, that
is to contrast it from idealistic reasons (in other words does it
leave us better off in 'real' terms, economically, security wise,
miltarily, etc.). I'm not implying that we should always support
nations on interest alone, or that ideals should not trump
interest. I agree with you, I support the Kurds, and Tawian as well
for that matter, for idealistic reasons. But notice our support for
those two worthy causes is actually very much curtailed by
realistic concerns (as it should be in some sense). Not so in the
case of Israel. This is why our support is "special."
Since I see the usual and tired charge of anti-semitism for anyone
opposing Israel's policies has already found its way to the thread
let me offer the following boring, trite disclaimer (sad in these
pc days one must prove one is NOT an anti-semite, racist, etc.,):
the Jews are easily one of the most accomplished, ethically
conscious ethnic groups in history, and Israel is a much more
democratic and free place than any other I can think of in that
area. It's just that Israel are in the wrong today.
Sorry to post back to back, but is anyone concerned for Reason contributor Michael Young who lives in Beirut? He and his family could be one of those killed by IDF in order to "teach Hizbollah a lesson." There are lots of Americans, Europeans, etc., in Beirut who are at risk to Israel's immoral attacks.
"I wonder how many were anti-Israel sympathizers before, versus
how many are now?"
About 100% versus 100%.
"But are they doing that? Israel actually stated that part of their
motivation is to make life miserable for the mostly secular,
Westernized government whom they "hold responsible" for the actions
of Hizbollah."
Suppose the Democrat Party set up some mortars and started shelling
Mexican towns. Mexico wants to know what's up. Washington says,
well, we're Republicans, they're a minority party in government,
it's not our worry, it's your problem. I suspect some shells would
start landing on American towns until Washington did something
about the Democrats.
If one is to believe the news, it would seem that Israel's response
has been quite tightly targeted. This is not to say at all that the
loss of civilian life is good and proper, it's just that the blame
is on Hezbollah. I'm reminded a bit of Thomas Sowell's "Knowledge
and Decisions," where he discussed at length the concept of people
making decisions where they benefit but don't suffer the
consequences of bad decision-making. Hezbollah may well have
reasoned that they're not the ones who will have the problem, it
will be the poor schmucks in Beirut.
"I was referring to belief in the authenticity and truth of
whatever religious text, for instance, rather than any particular
political current within Islam."
So am I. If one believes in the autheticity and absolute truth of
this text, one believes that Islam and Sharia must dominate
everyone else's life.
Ken,
I'm not sure if we're talking about the same thing exactly, but you
make some good points. One final objection: I do not think that
Israel's current attacks on Lebanon are necessarily immoral. If
Lebanon is a sovereign state, it is responsible for the actions of
Hezbollah to some extent.
What if we annex Israel and make it the fifty- first State?
Then, any aggression against Israel would be by definition an
attack on and declaration of war against the United States of
America. The citizens of Israel would send protection money (taxes)
to Washington, just like the rest of us. They could disband their
military, and turn their nuclear weapons over to the DoD.
Federal funds disbursed to Israel would be part of the domestic
budget, and on the books. The Senators from Israel would, of
course, have to get down there in the trough and wrestle Ted
Stevens and Robert Byrd for appropriations and earmarks. Maybe they
could earmark funds for a bridge.
Tariffs and subsidies would magically disappear; there would be
totally free and open trade. Israeli firms would have unfettered
access to our capital and equity markets.
And- the best part- those newly minted citizens would receive,
along with that beautiful American passport, all the benefits and
protections of the Constitution of the United States of America.
There might be a somewhat nettlesome period of adjustment, as they
adapt their legal system to Amendments like the First, Fifth and
Fourteenth but, hey, there's no such thing as a free lunch.
Egad. The worst job on the planet, probably even worse than that
recycling plant
I worked at for one day, is the elected official of Lebanon. It is
one thing to
have an impotence problem. It is something else altogether to have
it advertised
to the world.
This whole mess seems to be a showing of the cards held by all
parties. The
ambiguous relationship between these groups and the elected
governments in
Lebanon and the Palestinian territories are now not so ambigouous.
Yes there are
elements that want to normalize their populations, but the
extremists are
simultaneously too militarily powerful and too popular among sects
to get rid of
them.
Israel's only option is to approach the situation geographically.
They can't
destroy Hezbollah, but they can move them out of range by
controlling real
estate. That is a fight they can win - again. Hezbollah made a big
mistake. A
good portion of their shield was that ambiguity, and you lose that
immediately
upon your use of artillery.
Blah, sorry about the formatting there, I sent that as an email too and the editor made it goofy upon copy.
Jason Ligon,
Is there a parallel between Dubya bringing democracy to Iraq and
Olmert assuming the government of Lebanon can actually do
anything?
I've long associated Lebanon with Iceland during its anarchic
period. Or Somalia with a better geographical location: Location,
location, location.
If the "government" of Lebanon had simply declared anarchy, this
violence wouldn't be happening.
"Is there a parallel between Dubya bringing democracy to Iraq
and Olmert assuming the government of Lebanon can actually do
anything?"
See, here's the thing. The entirety of UN centric international
relations relies on everyone assuming that governments can actually
do something about what goes on within their borders - except when
it is inconvenient to so assume.
Every jackass with enough AK 47s behind him is granted sovereignity
in the eyes of the UN for the sake of stability. Then, we have this
grand show in which these guys issue proclamations to everyone,
preferably in such a fashion as to have a security council member
back your claim. Fine, you are a country. One day, mysterious
happenings occur within the borders of our young despotism - troop
movements, support of terrorists, etc. Immediate plausible
deniability is assumed. Yes you are the government, but no you
aren't accountable for anything that happens within your borders.
How grand for you!
The governing feature of the UN is that first, it shall be impotent
in every case that requires the application of force. We have now
moved to the completely laughable state where a condemnation
against the launching of ballistic missiles can't
even be agreed upon.
The generally accepted rule of the land is that power projection is
not needed by anyone except the US. This way, no one else has to
pay for it, and you can even type up a bunch of speeches about
American aggression to bolster your popularity. The complete
absence of any alternative to the deployment of the US military
seems to elude people.
from Haaretz.com:
Here
"The fatalities in the attack have been identified as Rafi Hazan,
30, of Haifa; Shlomi Mansura, 35, of Nahariya; Nissim Elharar, 47,
of Kiryat Ata; David Feldman, 28, of Kiryat Yam; Shmuel Ben Shimon,
41; Dennis Lapidos, 24, of Kiryat Yam; Rafael Damati, 39, of Kiryat
Yam; and Reuven Levi, 46, of Kiryat Ata."
Comfort and condolences to their families, friends, and loved ones.
The same to the Lebanese civilians - even though I've not been able
to find their names as of yet, their loss is meaningful and
profound. Comfort and condolonces to their families, friends, and
loved ones.
I have some good acquaintences in Haifa. I can only hope they're
okay. And we have some good family friends just outside of Beruit.
I hope they are okay.
DAMMIT. TOO MUCH VIOLENCE.
And for once and all:
Rick's points about political decisions made by a political
("Rechtsstaat" (what is the proper word?)) State say nothing about
the culture, religion, etc. of the peoples. Nor could you glean his
opinions of them. You are projecting your own feelings.
(We make fun of people being critical of the US current policies
with the "why do you hate America?" - I guess for you, that's
actually true. It must really suck being so narrow minded. Or is
that also true for you? Is being critical of the President's
policies akin to racism?)
It is disgusting to see "AntiSemitism" being thrown around so
lightly. It is so awful and hurtful and upsetting to see in real
life (real anti Semitism in action), your minimizations of Anti
Semitism and the pain of such wrong beliefs is disgusting.
Go to the Grosse Schiffegasse in Vienna. You'll see (right off of
Untere Donaustr.) a phone booth. It's not a phone booth, tho. It is
a guard post for an apartment building. Built in that crappy 50s
central european style. For years before that, it was ruins.
Before that it was a beautiful old Synagogue. It was destroyed in
the Pogrom against the Viennese Jews 9.11.38.
The guard is there, as the threat of violence or vandalism still
exists.
Check that out. Read Karl Kraus's "The Final Days of Humanity" (Die
lezten Tage der Menschheit). See the fear in the lines. Understand
what that means.
Go to Copenhagen. Check out the book, "That's how we fooled the
Gestapo". Go across Gamle Kongevej, right across from the
planetarium and the lake. You'll find an alley that ends in a right
angle turn to the right. There's a small window with iron bars
across it. And some dried flowers. Look up who was murdered there.
And why. He gave his life fighting one of the most evil forces
we've endured human history. Get someone to explain the song
(below) to you.
Kaemp for alt hvad du har kaert
doe om saa det gaelder,
da er Livet ej saa svaert,
Doeden ikke heller.
It was the last verse that prisoners sang in denmark before they
were executed by Gestapo pigs.
"fight for all you hold dear
die for which is worth it
since life isn't so hard
neither is death"
('cept it rhymes and brings tears to the eyes of anybody who can
read those words and knows where they're from)
And don't ever minimize the blackest spot on modern human history
ever again.
ever.
Being against political decisions made by a political state says
nothing about liking/disliking the culture or religion. You are a
disgusting human being (you: "Joe" and "Steven") for that
black/white view of the world. I respected and liked Rabin. I
didn't like Netanyahu's policies. If you can't see a difference in
being critical of their policies and the evil that you so lightly
banter about, I put it to you that you are the evil one.
Comfort and condolences to the civilians' families, friends, and
loved ones. You all are in our thoughts.
VM: Or the 24-hour-a-day armed soldiers guarding Judenstrasse (behind Fleischmarkt) because of attacks on the Jewish Cultural Center. I got stopped and held there once because I was carrying a bag (on my way to the Merkur). The soldiers were apologetic, but they pointed out that to the Israel haters, a Jew is a Jew is a Jew.
And don't ever minimize the blackest spot on modern human
history ever again.
ever.
You mean the African Slave Trade, right?
...is anyone concerned for Reason contributor Michael Young
who lives in Beirut?
Yes--even without munitions dropping about!
Every time I read something he writes criticizing some pretty
unscrupulous and unaccountable characters, I think about how easy
it is for me to lob criticism across the Atlantic safe from
harm.
If I was there, day in day out, and what I wrote appeared in print,
I'd like to think I'd have the balls to do that but I don't know
for sure.
Louis Walcott wrote: "You mean the African Slave Trade,
right?"
Well, he did qualify the statement by saying *modern* human
history. Depending on how one defines "modern" that could exclude
the slave trade.
The Real Bill:
Why is our monetary support of Israel special?... Would you
support bringing our troops home from every nation in which they
are stationed? Would you support the use of our military might only
to ensure that our vital trade routes are protected?
By far and away, the Israeli government gets the biggest share of
our foreign aid budget. The fact that they use part of it to
maintain their thieving occupation was one of the main motivating
factors of the 9/11 attacks.
I would use our military might only to protect American's liberty
and property, as the founders of our republic envisioned. So I
support bringing most of our troops home.
The Real Bill:
I accused you of antisemitism in the past (quite harshly, I'm
ashamed to admit). I no longer believe you to be antisemitic (and
so, I apologize)
Thank you, The Real Bill. I appreciate your honorable behavior.
When some call me an anti-Semite, in response to my criticisms of
the Israeli government and its supporters, it does bother me since
I am so opposed to all racism, as all most all libertarians are. As
Ayn Rand observed: "Racism is the most primitive form of
collectivism."
but I do think that some of your "allies", such as Raimondo,
are antisemites (which is the nicest word I'd use to describe
him).
Justin Raimondo is not an anti-Semite. He seems to have folks who
are Jews among those who are his friends, associates and fellow
libertarians. But he is a fine scholar and an activist.
Ayn_Randian:
The fact that Barton repeated the incredibly stupid claim that
Israel, one of our strongest allies, deliberately failed to inform
of us 9/11...
The evidence is overwhelming:
http://antiwar.com/israeli-files.php
Read Raimondo's book on the matter:
Terror Enigma: 9/11 And the Israeli Connection
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0595296823/reasonmagazineA/
Steven:
The person named Jennifer (anti-Semite? self hater?) prints a
song ridiculing the Jews and the religion of Judaism in response to
me copying a song that ridicules Rick Barton's secular religion of
anti-Semitism.
That's gota be one of the most inane comments in the history of
H&R. You said three incorrect things in just one sentence!
Modern's CE 1500 in my book.
In that case, I'd nominate the Stalin era in the Soviet Union.
There was no other 30 year period where so many were killed and
enslaved. The African/Caribbean slave trade (still on the Top 10
with a bullet, mind you) took much longer, didn't enslave as many,
and killed fewer.
Mao could be a dark horse candidate- it's still not clear how many
he killed.
According to a CNN/Time article,
Here, the situation is a dramatic and radical change from past
conflicts. Olmert wants to "set the price for aggression against
Israel so high that its enemies would be deterred from acting up in
the future."
A future flaw of this strategy would be an already realized
(silkworm against ship) increase in the use of modern weapons
available to Israel's foe's. A future conflict/exchange of more
accurate and destructive weapons has an endpoint. A bigger hammer
on either side is not the answer to that quagmire.
Don,
I'm not so sure. Israel is doing a couple of things differently
here. They are treating Hezbollah as an independent state
geographically located in south Lebanon. They are strategically
bombing to cut off supply lines into that area, and they are going
to make that area suffer badly. Hezbollah is not armed enough to
win or significantly arrest Israel's movements, but they are armed
enough to be a very obvious security threat to Israeli civilians.
The cover against Israel for a group like Hezbollah isn't their
military might. They are strong compared to the Lebanese
government, but what saves them from Israel is political cover and
blurred distinctions. Are they part of the Lebanese government? Are
they a charitable organization that builds schools? How popular are
they? And so forth. Problem is, once you start using artillery,
none of that matters anymore. They lost their shield.
If I were Israel and I wanted to stop the threat, I think I would
escalate too. Hezbollah may have some surprises, but in an
escalation Israel can put their strengths into play.
Jason Ligon,
I don't believe that Israel can afford over the long run to fight
an asymmetrical war in southern Lebanon. Israel's enemies have a
lot of advantages that aren't technological in nature in other
words.
PL:
I agree they shouldn't stick around, but I think they have the
luxury in this case of doing a sweep and leaving - or maintaining
bombardment. Hezbollah is currently engaging them as a military and
they are in that configuration susceptible to military counter
attack.
If I were Hezbollah, I would abandon equipment right now and
dissolve back into the population. Bring out a bunch of dead
babies, and your shield is back in place. If they choose to
continue to escalate this, they are stuck fighting a battle they
can't win.
Jason,
I would agree that, this time or temporarily, Israel has the might
to push Hezbollah out of range to protect it's northern
borders/civilians. I would do the same.
I think Iran/Syria/other will closely watch this event and evolve
their efforts for the next go round.
The person named Jennifer (anti-Semite? self hater?) prints
a song ridiculing the Jews and the religion of Judaism in response
to me copying a song that ridicules Rick Barton's secular religion
of anti-Semitism.
If it makes you feel better, Steven, I'd skipped over most of this
thread and wasn't even aware of your existence, let alone your
song, until I saw Rick's post quoting you castigating me.
P.S. Just because I personally control the world financial industry
doesn't mean there's any truth to those crazy old stories. And I
apologize for the dot-com crash and the upcoming housing bubble
poppage; I have discovered through bitter experience that when you
secretly manipulate the world banking infrastructure, it's best to
be not-stoned while you do it.
Jason Ligon,
Sans sending in troops all Israel can do is bomb targets. I don't
know if that is an effective strategy for breaking the will of
Hezbollah.
And as I understand it, Israel is reluctant to send in troops in
part because of all the land mines.
See, Jennifer, you understand that the idea of the scheming Jews
controlling the world is a common anti-semitic trope. So why can't
you see that when Rick Barton says the Israelis had prior knowledge
of 9/11, he's repeating the same type of disgusting crap?
There are three options for someone who believes Israel knew about
9/11:
1. anti-semite
2. crazy
3. naive
I'll give Rick Barton the benefit of the doubt and say he probably
falls under #3. But it seems like willful naivete (sp?).
Steve,
Rick Barton thinks Jason Raimondo is a "fine scholar." That puts
him in category #3. Maybe we need a fourth category--semi-literate
bozo.
Steve-
Why are the categories mutually exclusive? Could Barton fall into
all three?
"Modern's CE 1500 in my book.
In that case, I'd nominate the Stalin era in the Soviet Union.
There was no other 30 year period where so many were killed and
enslaved. The African/Caribbean slave trade (still on the Top 10
with a bullet, mind you) took much longer, didn't enslave as many,
and killed fewer.
Mao could be a dark horse candidate- it's still not clear how many
he killed."
I'd give my vote to the Cultural Revolution ... but only if we move
"modern" a little closer than 1500, say 1900.
From Wikipedia
R.J. Rummel has estimated that under the Communist Party of China's
rule, between the founding of the PRC and the current day, there
were 77 million democide deaths[means killed by the government],
though the figure is disputed. However it is recognised that,
whatever the correct figure, millions of deaths occurred during the
Cultural Revolution.
Not to minimize Rwanda, East Timor, the Holocaust, South Africa,
World War I or II, the Japanese occupation of Manchuria, Hiroshima,
Nagasaki, the Khmer Rouge, the Nazi, American lynchings, The recent
war in the Congo, the current N Korean government, and our friends
in the various South American dictatorships...
There is more than enough grief in history.
The current actions of Hezbollah, Hamas, Israel are just adding to
their small contributions to the list.
VM, a great post, by the way. This is about humans on both
sides.
Steve, Bob, Joe,
Judging by what you've written, I'm gratified that you three have
taken umbrage at my comments.
So why can't you see that when Rick Barton says the Israelis
had prior knowledge of 9/11, he's repeating the same type of
disgusting crap?
Steve just committed a logical fallacy.
If I were Hezbollah, I would abandon equipment right now and
dissolve back into the population. Bring out a bunch of dead
babies, and your shield is back in place. If they choose to
continue to escalate this, they are stuck fighting a battle they
can't win.
How's Hezbollah doin' with the status quo?
Israel in Lebanon brought Hezbollah into existence--Israel's
actions in Lebanon probably won't sap Hezbollah's support now.
...and I'm not sure Hezbollah sees a regional conflict as a
negative thing.
Don't get me wrong. As I wrote above, I think it might be in the
best interest of the United States if Israel wiped Hezbollah off
the face the earth. ...but I'm not sure Hezbollah's too worried
about that.
See
this wikipedia entry regarding "Hezbollah's activities
following the Cedar Revolution".
It looks like they've been tryin' to provoke a regional conflict by
way abducting Israeli troops for some time. They seem to want
this.
MainStreamMan,
That's because there were fewer to kill. I think a per capita kill
rate might be a more useful metric in comparing the Atlantic,
internal African and middle eastern trade in Africans with Stalin's
efforts at mass slaughter.
I have to ask, why does everyone always forget that the internal African slave trade as well as that to the middle east was just as terrible as that in the Atlantic?
PL
"Sans sending in troops all Israel can do is bomb targets. I don't
know if that is an effective strategy for breaking the will of
Hezbollah.
And as I understand it, Israel is reluctant to send in troops in
part because of all the land mines."
I think they will send in troops for a sweep. I was only suggesting
that they shouldn't occupy for any great period of time. If they
can bomb to cut off supply and they have air dominance, they may be
able to use airborne forces to cut off avenues of physical retreat
and scour a 20 mile deep strip from the border.
If Hezbollah is mining their own territory, they have declared it a
formal battlefield. Traditional thinking is that you don't mine
places where your own civilians are operating. If they have mines
in place, they are announcing that only Hezbollah is operating in
those areas. Mines can be cleared with heavy armor and the right
gear. It is again something Israel can do but Hezbollah
can't.
I wonder what would happen if Israel decided to just mine the crap
out of an area wide enough to prevent border encroachment ...
"How's Hezbollah doin' with the status quo?"
I don't know. They controlled south Lebanon, enjoyed popular
support, and had seats in the Lebanese government. To me, it is
hard to see recent actions as anything other than sticking a finger
in the eye of Lebanon as a whole. They now have the Lebanese
government asking for UN forces to help purge them from the south.
It looks like an overplayed hand.
"As Ayn Rand observed: Racism is the most primitive form of
collectivism.'" ---Rick Barton
Ayn Rand - Ford Hall, 1972
"Whatever rights the Palestinians may have had -- I don't know the
history of the Middle East well enough to know what started the
trouble -- they have lost all rights to anything: not only to land,
but to human intercourse. If they lost land, and in response
resorted to terrorism -- to the slaughter of innocent citizens --
they deserve whatever any commandos anywhere can do to them, and I
hope the commandos succeed."
wow. he applies something he learned today.
very good. *pat pat*
Well, I did apply something I learned today. I had no idea Rand had such retrograde views.
Bob,
If Ayn had known the history of the Middle East better, she would
have known that among the Palestinians, from 1948 on, there have
been hundreds of thousands innocent civilians who have been
victimized. (750,000 upon the founding of the Israeli state alone)
This victimization has included murder.
I do however agree with her sentiment against the slaughter of
innocents.
Also I'm surprised and troubled by her collectivist way of looking
at the tragedy. I mean, do all the Palestinians lose their land
rights cuz some have resorted to terrorism? Doesn't sound like Ayn
Rand thinking to me.
Rick Barton
Apparently Ayn wasn't so sqeemish about slaughtering innocents
either:
Ayn Rand Answers: The Best of Her Q & A.
A. Ayn Rand says: hell yes, kill the innocent
If we go to war with Russia, I hope the 'innocent' are destroyed
with the guilty. ... Nobody has to put up with aggression, and
surrender his right of self-defense, for fear of hurting somebody
else, guilty or innocent. When someone comes at you with a gun, if
you have an ounce of self-esteem, you answer with force, never mind
who he is or who's standing behind him. (p. 95)
Rick Barton
Germans slaughtered millions of Jews, Gypsies, Poles, and countless
others. American killed thousands of Indians. Hindus slaughter
Muslims; Muslims slaughter Hindus. Hutus slaughtered Tutsis; Sunnis
slaughter Shi'ites. Cathloics have slaughtered Protestants, and
Protestatnts have slaughtered Catholics. And, yes, Israel has
victimized hundreds of thousand of Palestnians. So what's your
point? That the Jews are human after all? Maybe the Palestinians
just can't get over losing. Other groups who have been
victimized--notably the Jews--have gotten on with life. Why can't
the Palestinians?
It doesn't matter about the tone of the conversation.
He is an anti-Semite (you know who I mean)! Anyone who says that
Jews are comitting aggression because for acting in retalliation to
terrorists kidnapping and killing their soldiers, so hates the
Jewish state that the individual cannot even think straight. His
friend Thoreau says that he made the Jewish State his pet
project. This is natural that he do so. Anti-Semites are
always obsessed with the Jews -- how bad they are and that they
should be punished because of the gut hatred the anti-Semite has
for them.
Rabbi Kahane, Zt"l gave advice on how to deal with
anti-Semites.
In addition to the earlier song, here's another song that he can
listen too,
http://www.bobdylan.com/songs/bully.html
Neighborhood Bully
Well, the neighborhood bully, he's just one man,
His enemies say he's on their land.
They got him outnumbered about a million to one,
He got no place to escape to, no place to run.
He's the neighborhood bully.
The neighborhood bully just lives to survive,
He's criticized and condemned for being alive.
He's not supposed to fight back, he's supposed to have thick
skin,
He's supposed to lay down and die when his door is kicked in.
He's the neighborhood bully.
The neighborhood bully been driven out of every land,
He's wandered the earth an exiled man.
Seen his family scattered, his people hounded and torn,
He's always on trial for just being born.
He's the neighborhood bully.
Well, he knocked out a lynch mob, he was criticized,
Old women condemned him, said he should apologize.
Then he destroyed a bomb factory, nobody was glad.
The bombs were meant for him.
He was supposed to feel bad.
He's the neighborhood bully.
Well, the chances are against it and the odds are slim
That he'll live by the rules that the world makes for him,
'Cause there's a noose at his neck and a gun at his back
And a license to kill him is given out to every maniac.
He's the neighborhood bully.
He got no allies to really speak of.
What he gets he must pay for, he don't get it out of love.
He buys obsolete weapons and he won't be denied
But no one sends flesh and blood to fight by his side.
He's the neighborhood bully.
Well, he's surrounded by pacifists who all want peace,
They pray for it nightly that the bloodshed must cease.
Now, they wouldn't hurt a fly.
To hurt one they would weep.
They lay and they wait for this bully to fall asleep.
He's the neighborhood bully.
Every empire that's enslaved him is gone,
Egypt and Rome, even the great Babylon.
He's made a garden of paradise in the desert sand,
In bed with nobody, under no one's command.
He's the neighborhood bully.
Now his holiest books have been trampled upon,
No contract he signed was worth what it was written on.
He took the crumbs of the world and he turned it into wealth,
Took sickness and disease and he turned it into health.
He's the neighborhood bully.
What's anybody indebted to him for?
Nothin', they say.
He just likes to cause war.
Pride and prejudice and superstition indeed,
They wait for this bully like a dog waits to feed.
He's the neighborhood bully.
What has he done to wear so many scars?
Does he change the course of rivers?
Does he pollute the moon and stars?
Neighborhood bully, standing on the hill,
Running out the clock, time standing still,
Neighborhood bully.
Copyright ? 1983 Special Rider Music
Steven,
You just don't know what you're talking about. I despise
anti-Semitism and all racism. You must be an idiot!
Rick Barton promotes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and focuses exclusively and obssessively on Israel's faults. I think it's safe to say he's an anti-Semite no matter how much he claims to despise anti-Semitism and racism. He doesn't fool me.
Uri,
What about when I bash thug Arab governments? That's not focusing
exclusively on Israel's faults. What about when I praise Israeli
civil (non-governmental) society (with the exception of the
religious nut-balls)? That's not focusing obsessively on Israel's
faults. But what's really critical is that I attack the Israeli
government and its supporters, not Jews in general. If I was
Jewish, I imagine that you?d be far more tolerant of what I write
about Israel. If you really think that I'm an anti-Jewish bigot,
you are being quite foolish.
wait..
we have not been through a WW3 yet...
no one has ever declared WW3...
no one has ever publicly called the "war on terror" or "the war in
Iraq" WW3..
there has never really been a WW3, yet.
how did we eagerly jump to WW4?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245