David Weigel | June 23, 2006
Julian Sanchez reviews two books on marriage and debunks the frenzy and hysteria now dominating talk about the institution.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Excellent review of two excellent books. I particularly recommend "Promises I Can Keep," although the Coontz book is, at least in my opinion, the better-written. "P.I.C.K," however, has the more interesting argument and evidence. Until we understand better the day to day lives of the underclass, there's no way on earth we can make any kind of policy, public or not, to change the aspects that need it. Go buy and read both books.
A good article overall, but Sanchez commits the dreadfully common fallacy of confusing correlation with causation by implying that the experience of growing up without both biological parents causes the problems for children that he lists. Judith Rich Harris, the Copernicus of child development, specifically disproves this chain of cause and effect in her book The Nurture Assumption. Every libertarian should listen to Harris. Like Wal-Mart, McDonald's, and marijuana, divorce is opposed partly out of faulty reasoning and crude moralism. I wonder how many miserable families stay together because of an anti-divorce guilt trip, even though a divorce might, on balance, do all their members good.
brian423,
Her knew book "No Two Alike" will rock your world too.
She is often quoted by Steven Pinker. This is how I first found out
about her.
Government seems to run on two premises.
Julian is right, I've seen about 6,000 marriages on the beach in
Maui in the last three weeks. All seem to be between men and women,
though in some cases there was a little doubt. You know what I
mean, the bride looked like Uncle Susie. Insensitive I know, but we
still wished them well and smiled.
Back to the beach............
all rhetoric aside, there is no better predictor in the USA i am
aware of for social pathology (ie "bad behavior") than being born
out of wedlock/to a single mother
period
whether it's crime, crime victimization, low income, lack of income
quintile mobility, etc. etc. etc. the link is too strong to
ignore
"the link is too strong to ignore"
Ignore? I thought I devoted a rather lengthy paragraph early in the
piece to talking about exactly that link.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245