Julian Sanchez | June 16, 2006
Matt "Mittens" Yglesias ponders a recent editorial in The Nation that tries to straddle the line between stoking anxiety about media concentration and... uh... acknowledging obvious reality. Domestic media have become less concentrated over the last decade, and (more importantly) the Net means it's easier and far more common to get the perspective of foreign media. And as Matt notes, the absolute amount of concentration is less important than which outlets are concentrated. That some one big corporation controls a cable news channel and Cat Fancy and eight bridal magazines, while the New York Times, the Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal are independent strikes me as rather less ominous than if the reverse were true. Media analyst Ben Compaine deflated media monopoly mania in one of Reason's more terrifyingly illustrated cover stories back in 2004.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I frequent a certain web forum where shocking pics are hidden behind innocent-looking links, but that cover was just horrible.
My eyes, my eyes!! Damn you Julian, that was wrong, wrong, wrong. There outta be a law....
Yah. I've never understood it either, even from their perspective. Media concentration wasn't a problem for the Cronkite era?
"Media concentration wasn't a problem for the Cronkite
era?"
At the local level, arguably yes, since most major cities
still had two or more local daily newspapers and the ability to own
multiple newspapers and/or radio stations was more strictly
regulated. At the national level it was more concentrated, at least
in television broadcasting. There's also the perceived issue of
corporate ownership. I don't know if it's true, but the perception
at least was that television/radio/newspaper/magazine outlets were
operated by specialized media companies rather than being part of
larger, non-media corporations (like General Electric owning
NBC).
What concerns me far more than current media consolidation is the ever increasing reliance on the half-assed reporting done by the Associated Press. The Drug Czar drops a press release and the AP picks it up, changes a couple of words, plops a byline on it and calls it a well researched article. From there every fucking paper in the nation prints it as gospel with nary a bit of vetting. When did reporters become mimeographs?
Yeah, you want media concentration? Go to a place like, oh,
Norway or something where there are like two newspapers, both state
funded, and both carry the government water. How diverse.
At least in the United States, we've got several hundred major
daily's that carry the government water. Hmm... never mind.
The mainstream press in the U.S. is conspicuous for what it
excludes. On October 10, 2001, CNN made a brief mention of a foiled
terrorist bomb plot in the Mexican Parliament building. They
promised to bring any further developments of this story to their
viewers, but the incident was never heard of again. But the story
appeared in bold headlines on the front page of the major Mexican
newspapers and was also posted on the official website of the
Mexican Justice Department. Two terrorist suspects were caught with
a high powered gun, nine hand grenades, and C-4 plastic explosives
The two terrorists were Salvador Gerson Sunke and Sar ben Zui.One
was identified as a MOSSAD (Israeli Intelligence). The other a
Mexican Jew. They had fake Pakistani Passports.
Had the two men been Muslims, the story would most certainly have
been headline news in every major news outlet.
Uri Mileshtin, an official historian for the Israeli Defense Force,
has written and spoken about the use of bacteriological agents.
According to Mileshtin, Moshe Dayan, a division commander at the
time, gave orders in 1948 to remove Arabs from their villages,
bulldoze their homes, and render water wells unusable with typhus
and dysentery bacteria. (Please visit
vitaltruths.blogsource.com for more info.)
This sort of information is absent from the Mainstream Press.
Kwix,
Sometime around Walter Lippmann's day, I think. A huge amount of
the non-advertising column space in newspapers is taken up by the
output of press conferences and PR departments.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245