Tim Cavanaugh | May 27, 2006
Here's a question to ponder as you honor the Memorial Day weekend in your own way: Who else should be allowed to sneak F bombs into television commercials, now that thetruth.com has rolled out its whudafxup campaign? I have no complaints with the content of the first whudafxup commercial, which unclouds the public mind about British-American Tobacco Co.'s use of the word "Zephyr" as a code for "cancer" in internal documents in the 1950s. And I'm not recommending that FCC chairman Kevin Martin—last seen puzzling over the contextual riddle of when and where the word fuck can be uttered, pursuing TV stations with $32,500 and $325,000 fines for using unsigned advertorials, and deciding not to investigate the question of whether it was lawful for three major phone carriers to provide confidential customer information to the National Security Agency—exert himself pursuing a bunch of antitobacco do-gooders. I'm just saying take a look at the commercial: These bullhorned public servants are embedding more fucks than there were in the Clam-Plate Orgy. Who else is allowed to play?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Hey just as long as they stop showing the commercial with the close up of the cows asshole.
Seanbaby.com's best slogan: "Because kids shoot each other if they hear the word *fuck*."
I think the new rule is that people on the side of Truth and Goodness and can say fuck all they want - after all, they're speaking Truth to Power, maaan.
What about Burger King's "Bucking Chicken"? I'm sure that's not a sad attempt to get kids to buy BK products because they dared to almost say "fuck" on TV. Whoa, what edginess.
BAI
You heard the word cunt on broadcast television!? In the
afternoon? I don't believe you.
Okay, cunt might have been basic cable, just going off of my
(admittedly) spotty memory, but I'm pretty sure of the rest.
When I hear dick and pussy on talk radio where I
live, however,it is always in the context of a person's
characteristics ("He's a real dick", "Anti-war demonstrators are a
bunch of pussies") not a reference to sexual organs, so that may be
why there seems to be no apparent "outrage".
It seems like the FCC has always turned a blind eye toward very
popular songs if the expletive is half-way slurred or muddled, such
as Roger Daltrey's rapid, accented "Who the FUCK are
you?!" (I've never heard that bleeped out on radio)at the end
of Who Are You.
Speaking of odd censorship, last nigh on Futurama, the phrase
"Sweet zombie Jesus" was shortened to a much less funny "sweet
zombie." Anyone else think this odd?
Maybe the new unsayable words will be jesus, mohammed, Qu'ran,
etc.
Also, Saturday Fun Fact:
The Simpsons episode where this takes place:
Homer: Well, there's not a bear in sight. The Bear Patrol is sure
doing its job.
Lisa: That's specious reasoning, Dad.
Homer: Thank you, sweetie.
Lisa: Dad, what if I were to tell you that this rock keeps away
tigers.
Homer: Uh-huh, and how does it work?
Lisa: It doesn't work. It's just a stupid rock.
Homer: I see.
Lisa: But you don't see any tigers around, do you?
Homer: (Looks around) Lisa, I'd like to buy your rock.
Is actually from an old Sufi story about Mullah Nasrudin. The story
goes like this:
Mullah Nasrudin was scattering breadcrumbs and rocks around his
house. His neighbors wondered why he was doing this, so they went
over and asked him. Nasrudin replied, "I am putting the bread and
rocks to keep away tigers." One of his neighbors said, "Mullah,
there are no tigers in this area." Nasrudin smiled and said, "See
how well they work!"
The more you know...
Randolph Carter - Regarding the editing on Futurama, who did it? Is this one of the Cartoon Network re-runs during their Adult Swim lineup?
It was one of the cartoon network re-runs on adult swim. I only noticed because I had just watched the episode on DVD earlier in the day.
Nasrudin smiled and said, "See how well they
work!"
Later that year, Nasrudin would emigrate to America. He would
eventually become the head of the NEA.
Well, if they can say fuck on the air in the name of anti-smoking, then I would like to see MUCH more graphic commercials explaining what smoking can do to your sex life.
And a follow up to my comment that people are filtering out
offencive anti-smoking ads:
Health Canada currently makes cigarette companies here print
warning labels containing graphic images of things like blackened
lungs and cancer patients. They're now going to put even more
graphic pictures, because smokers are no longer reacting to the
existing images. I'm wondering when they're going to resort to
using pics of aborted fetuses and post-autopsied bodies.
Enough's been said about the circumventing of FCC rules for trivial government sponsored propaganda crap, but I just wanted to say that Derrick really, really reminds me of Butros-Butros Ghali on the "WhatDaFxUp" site home page.
I know some of you have seen this before. It has gotten good
reviews and has some vague connection to the topic. Here (once
again) is the public service announcement I want to see.
Setting: Sunny day in the park, father and son taking a
stroll.
Kid: Dad, did you ever do drugs?
Dad:[stammers] Well uhh
[guy with large Que cards (QCG) runs up and holds up card that
reads:
YEAH I DID
AND IT WAS A DUMB THING TO DO]
Dad: [Looks at card, begins reading, vaguely dispassionate]
Yeah I did, and it was a dumb...
[shakes head begins speaking in engaged conversation voice ]
Yeah, yeah I did. I did a lot of dumb things too. But I also had
some great times. Some of the best moments of my life happened when
I was high. Like the first time I made love to your mother.
[QCG gets panicked look on face. Turns card over and reads it
(twice) turns card back around and holds it up, waves it back and
forth]
Kid: Sooooo, you're saying drugs made your life better?
Dad: I'm saying that drugs are powerful things. And like all
powerful things, you need to have a healthy fear of them. You see
son, drugs, like cars, a little knowledge, and religion, can be
very dangerous. But they can also be useful and life enhancing when
used responsibly. It's important that you educate yourself on the
effects and risks before you start experimenting.
[QCG rotates the "yeah I did" card to back of stack. He frantically
waves the new top card which reads:
BUT NO ONE EVER TALKED TO ME ABOUT IT]
Dad: [turns his back to QCG and faces his son] And the biggest risk
of all is the fact that they're illegal. Not only can you get
arrested, but if you're convicted you loose any chance of getting
into college or landing a decent job. And of course there's no FDA
or even Consumer's Reports to ensure purity and quality. For
instance, Ecstasy is far safer than beer, but when you buy pills on
the black market, there's no way of knowing what is in them. You
could be putting anything from sugar to cyanide in your body.
[Father and son begin walking again. QCG violently throws the "no
one ever" card away. His new card reads:
DRUGS ARE BAD
MMMMM-KAY
He is walking backwards and jamming his finger at his card]
Kid: So if making drugs illegal actually makes them more dangerous,
why don't we just end drug prohibition?
Dad: Well it's like I said son, people do a lot of dumb
things.
[Father and son continue talking and walk off together]
[QCG trips and falls to ground, cards go flying. Close up on his
face - look of exasperation]
QCG: I need a drink
Looks like teens are already tiring of Truth's paternalism
(would they be teens if they couldn't spot it?!?).
Just click "Rate More" and take a look. Teens have rated, by a
60%/40% margin for a product that kills "50,000 people each year
who don't even use it" and "12,000 people killed each day". They
were also overwhelmingly in favor of using the term Zephyr as a
metaphor for cancer.
Game over man!
Our system has detected you are seriously draggin' on your
flash upgrades. So let's get to it. It takes only a minute, and
everything here at Whudafxup.com is gonna work a lot smoother once
you're up-to-date. Enjoy!
Is anything lamer than adults trying to seem hip by using slang
that they don't understand? Seriously, dudes. It's a simple
technical upgrade message. You sound much cooler with a "this site
requires Flash X.n" than with "you're draggin' on your
upgrades."
the whatdafuxup website also has links to... paris hilton titty-flashing porn. In the "Duh news" section. Is the guy who runs it some kind of ridiculous performance artist?
This is just my reaction but I got rid of my tv 2 years ago
because the truth and the ondcp ads were so patronizing and smug
and everywhere. I grew weary of engaging in media that trotted out
such bullshit. I found it better to find other outlets that haven't
been polluted. Several magazines I had subscriptions to that
advertised themselves as 'progressive culture' outlets started
having truth ads and I stopped my subscription. I have no belief
that enough people would be willing to do this to make an impact
but I am happier not seeing this paternalistic filth trotted out. I
just don't want to be a part of that shit. I hope all of this
fuckwits who were involved in producing that crap have long lives
filled with dementia shitting themselves in a nursing home at 90.
I'll die happy at 60 but I've lived more smoking drinking and
whoring.
-doesn't hurt that I don't like sports and never was that into tv.
I got satellite radio and a spend a lot on books and have a vacant
look at work when everybody discusses american idol.
Randolph,
Even better. One of the articles they link to from the Motley Fool
is calling US Tobacco an undervalued stock with a high-dividend
yield (>5%) and that one should consider inveting in it. Ahh,
good ol anti-tobacconists plugging tobacco companies.
Is anything lamer than adults trying to seem hip by using
slang that they don't understand?
What's lamer is having an entirely flash based site to begin with.
One of my pet peeves...
What's lamer is having an entirely flash based site to begin
with.
A flash based site with no "skip intro" feature.
Seems like only a year ago me and the other smokers lined up at the truth mobile at the SDSU tailgate before the aztecs game. I still have some sweet pictures of us all with cigarettes in one hand and Coronas in the other wearing the snazzy t-shirts and sweatbands they handed out. I miss college.
Ahh, good ol anti-tobacconists plugging tobacco
companies.
Well, of course, Mo, if one subscribed to conspiracy theories, one
might speculate that since thetruth.com is dependent on tobacco
revenues for their funding they have developed a vested interest in
the continued profitability of the tobacco industry.
Or is it possible they're just incompetent and have not vetted
their links adequately?
What's lamer is having an entirely flash based site to begin
with. One of my pet peeves...
A Flash site that requires Flash 8 to view. I'm missing
out on all the fun, because Linux only has Flash 7 available for
it. Who will tell all the geeky teens that smoking is bad for them
if they can't see that site on their computers? Think of the
children! Don't use crappy flash animations for your site!
Who will tell all the geeky teens that smoking is bad for
them if they can't see that site on their computers?
That sounds to me like a pretty poor bunch o' geeks.
The problem with the truth campagin is that is captures the teen
"mood" so well.
Antagnoistic, know-it-all confronataional and lots of other
annoying adjectives that help explain why we sequester people of
this age now in universities in hopes they will grow out of the
worst of it before the rest of us have to listen to them.
I never saw a point to smoking, but I did once consider using a
nicotine patch to see what the drug was like.
Health Canada currently makes cigarette companies here print
warning labels containing graphic images of things like blackened
lungs and cancer patients.
I've always thought they were going about that wrong. How many
teens care what they look like on the inside? Now a picture of a
model with a lung surgery scar...
Warren nailed it. Although I think the main point of encouraging
parents to deny teen drug use is indeed to avoid "mixed messages."
Like having so many successful adults admitting they spent college
experimenting while we're trying to scare everyone with the "fact"
that juvenile drug use leads inevitably to junky hell.
Presented for your approval: The year was 1959. Tobacco companies were using the code-name ZEPHYR in place of "CANCER" in internal memos. At the same time, five-pack-a-day chain-smoker Rod Serling was writing CBS's cult-favorite TV series, "The Twilight Zone." A popular first-season episode, which would have been written late in 1959 or early in 1960, featured a baseball team named the "Hoboken Zephyrs." Some say the use of this rarely heard word in both the tobacco company memos and Serling's classic TV episode was mere coincidence. But then, it is also said that there are no "coincidences" in ... THE TWILIGHT ZONE.
Duh News?
"Proof that the truth is stranger than fiction. Well not the
truth as in us the truth but like the truth truth...Anyway, just
read these curiously newsworthy stories and you'll see what we're
talking about."
The first four "news" items go to thesuperficial.com.
"About The Superficial
The Superficial is a brutally honest look at society and its
obsession with the superficial. It is not satire. It is not social
commentary. It is the voice of our society at its worst. It is
first impressions without sense of social obligation. It is the
truth of our generation. It is ugly racism. It is jealousy. It is
honest.
Just kidding. Our goal is to make fun of as many people as
possible."
And they do! Is theonion.com "newsworthy" as well?
I also had to type Duh News out by hand because you cannot copy and
paste the text off of a Flash-based website. Whudafxup with
that?
My favorite is from comedy central.
Stand up guy telling jokes about how comedy central has asked him
not to say "dick" so much. Turns out that he can call somebody a
"dick" but he can't talk about his "dick" without the need for them
to bleep...
So he did a whole routine about "But what if some guy's dick is you
know kind of a dick." The broadcast fluidly bleeped or not the
appropriate reference across maybe 30 each in the next five
minutes.
Geez, the tobacco companies used a euphemism for cancer back in the fifties? Stop the fucking presses! Is that the best the anti-smoking assholes can do these days?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245