Peter Bagge takes a fully-illustrated trip to the boundaries of the drug war.
Reason Magazine
Most Popular Stories
- Fox Business Network Cancels Judge Andrew Napolitano's Freedom Watch (2.9)
- Breitbart on libertarians in 2012 (2.11)
- Did the Drug War Make it Any Easier for Whitney Houston to Seek Help For Substance Abuse? (2.12)
- The Inside and Outside of CPAC 2012 (2.10)
- One Possible Reason There Are So Few Liberals, Starring Jonathan Chait. And Some Stuff About Tax Progressivity. (2.10)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Romney Most Electable Candidate, Yet Gingrich in Statistical Tie Among GOP Voters (1.31)
- Explaining Newt’s Second Surge (1.26)
- George Washington Would Beat Out Romney as Richest President; John Kerry Would Have, Too (1.25)
- New Poll: Americans Aren't Ready for Another War (1.20)
- 2012 Election Match Up: Romney Wins, Paul Might (1.13)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
|5.22.06 @ 9:18AM|#
Yay!
No better way to start the week than with a new Bagge strip.
|5.22.06 @ 10:51AM|#
With all due respect to PB, the cartoons just distract from the prose. It would have made a good short article, but is not really cartoon material.
Sayyyy, would I be correct in assuming that PB spent a lot of time absorbing Clay Wilson and Gilbert Shelton? I see what appears to be their influence in the visual part of his work.
"I hereby liberate the fuckbooks in the name of the revolution!"
tomWright|5.22.06 @ 11:31AM|#
And yea, the final sign of the apocalypse shale be the persecution of the lords weed, er, work, and the tormenting of his children...
|5.22.06 @ 2:21PM|#
Is that Jacob Sullum in the bottom righthand panel on page 1?
|5.22.06 @ 5:13PM|#
No hyphen in "fully illustrated." Who edits this shit?
|5.22.06 @ 5:14PM|#
It's a collaborative effort.
|5.22.06 @ 6:20PM|#
"Fully illustrated" doesn't need a hyphen. It is technically NOT a compound modifier, since "fully" doesn't modify the following object. "Fully" in this instance is an adverb that modifies "illustrated."
Joe, learn your grammar before you make a fully realized ass out of yourself.
|5.22.06 @ 9:46PM|#
Jamie Kelly,
GTFO my internets.
|5.22.06 @ 11:00PM|#
Jamie, you fucking moron, I was pointing out that there shouldn't be a hyphen in "fully illustrated." There is one in Weigle's post:
Peter Bagge takes a fully-illustrated trip to the boundaries of the drug war.
Posted by David Weigel at May 22, 2006 08:30 AM
|5.23.06 @ 7:52AM|#
After reading Joe and Jamie Kelley's rage fueled exchange over punctuation I just clutched my pillow to my large American male breasts and whimpered, 'what..EVER!'
|5.23.06 @ 10:28AM|#
Hey Joe, check this out:
It's me.
Not giving a powdered-sugar-coated goddamn.
M. Simon|5.24.06 @ 12:51AM|#
I don't think the drug war will be ended by "rights" talk.
I think scandal and outing the medical cartel will work much better.
The War On Unpatented Drugs.
*