Brian Doherty | May 17, 2006
I hate Big Government, but I love wacky gadgets. Meet DARPA's latest, the Man Cannon. It
consists of a forward-facing chair mounted on rails that point at an angle of up to 80 [degrees]. Powered by compressed air, the foolhardy "payload" would shoot up until the saddle reaches the end of the rails, at which point he would flail free skyward.
The application is extremely detailed, with proposals for computer control, feedback mechanisms, and valve pneumatics....the designers reckon a four metre high launcher could put a man on the top of a five storey building in less than two seconds.
Here's the patent, in case you want to build your own, in blatant violation of patent law.
[Hat tip: Jim Mason]
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Okay, I read this and said, "HUH? WTF?"
Then I RTFA, and saw:
...designed to hurl SWAT teams and other emergency workers onto
the roofs of inaccessible tall buildings human cannonball
style..."
Oh. Okay. I've got nothing against "other emergency workers," but
they can do this to as many SWAT teams as they want.
This is another one of those stories that gives me the feeling that if I want serious news I'm going to just have to stick to reading The Onion.
I think the basis for the "man cannon" patent is on shakey legal ground. I have prior art... in my pants!
If I had one of these, it would take me about two hours tops to get arrested. The thought of flinging rotting food and old furniture onto people's houses would just be too much to pass up.
First thing I thought was, "monkey fishing!". ...the next thing I thought was, "how do I get one of these?"
If the trajectory is plotted just right, consider that at the
top of the arc verticle speed goes to zero, the drop to the roof
could be the equivelent of five feet. With the lateral speed
figured in, the human projectile could be trained to tuck and roll
for a landing with just a few bruises and no broken bones.
I think they should find some willing ATF guys to test it out
on.
So which defense contractor came up with this? ACME? Was Wile E. Coyote (super genius)the test pilot?
They should test it out with the remote-controlled sharks-- just imagine Osama and crew, holed up in a Chicago Apartment complex, chuckling about how they were finally safe from the DoD, then (cue jaws music). . .
Actually, it appears the evil genius behind this was Dean Kamen, inventor of the Segway.
I see this as a dual-use product--it would make for excellent handicap access to small tenement buildings.
f I had one of these, it would take me about two hours tops
to get arrested. The thought of flinging rotting food and old
furniture onto people's houses would just be too much to pass
up.
Heh. That reminds me of the "yardapult" :)
1) I smell a Mythbusters episode in this. Poor Buster.
2) So is it called the Mannon?
/Obvious-Puns-R-Us
I see this as a dual-use product--it would make for
excellent handicap access to small tenement buildings.
Too funny! Brilliant idea but for the inconvenient fact that the
er, ok tomWright, Mannon, is a one-way solution. Going up is easy;
coming down - not so much.
Brian,
How about a bungee cord set up that is calculated to gently set the
person down, then release?
How about a bungee cord set up that is calculated to gently
set the person down, then release?
NoStar,
Not bad... Not only functional, but your plan has the added benefit
of helping to fight the growing national scourge of handicapped
obesity. Gain 5 pounds and you get a mild rebuke. Gain 20 pounds
you get a sharp kick in the ass. :)
Of course, now that I think about it, if you lose 20 pounds you're
left swinging in the breeze so maybe it needs a little
re-thinking...
As one of the few token women here, I have to say:
Man Cannon is the sexiest weapon EVER.
Just thinking about it makes me weak in the knees!
I looked at the drawing, and the occupant appears to be launched head first, making landing really awkward. All I could think of was how horrible it would be to be trapped on the top of a building and have my putative rescuer splattered onto the roofing, head first. Talk about adding insult to injury. Until then, I think DARPA could make some extra bucks by selling designs like this to late night comedians.
I looked at the drawing, and the occupant appears to be
launched head first, making landing really awkward.
Actually, the person isn't fired head-long like a circus cannon,
but rather the idea seems to be to lift him in a standing position
like an invisible (and parabolic) escalator. If done correctly, as
NoStar pointed out above (i.e. correct vertical velocity so the
human-projectile comes to a stop at the correct roof-top height and
a horizontal velocity large enough that he doesn't come straight
back down yet small enough that he doesn't go flying across the
roof), they should be able to almost step onto the roof, somewhat
like stepping off an escalator.
Is the national guard going to use these along the border to "return" our guest workers who overstay?
After re-reading my post it occurred that a much easier way to
explain how it is supposed to work. Imagine jumping up onto, say, a
chair or a table-top. In principle there is no reason you couldn't
jump up onto a roof in the same way; just the practical problem
that your legs aren't strong enough to impart the required vertical
velocity. That's where the Man Cannon
(are you swooning linguist?) comes in.
In other words the Man Cannon (control
yourself!) is designed simply to enhance a man's natural
abilities... ;)
Could this be adapted for my front steps? Then when the nice church people knock on my door I could just toss them across the street into the neighbors yard.
Only high-caliber personages would be cannon fodder here, but
not too high caliber, or else they will not go far.
Does anyone else here recall Evil Knievel's televised murdercycle
launch across the Grand Canyon?
It bore resemblence to Geraldo Rivera's televised bursting through
into the long-hidden chamber.
They just have to watch out that they don't launch the guy
through a stream of that super-slippery riot control gunk they
invented.
It'd kinda suck to land on top of the building, but not be able to
stop yourself from sliding off the other side.
Tallocaust meet funnelator.
Fantastic! Too bad I'm a poor college student. I'm taking
donations.
They should test it out with the remote-controlled sharks--
just imagine Osama and crew, holed up in a Chicago Apartment
complex, chuckling about how they were finally safe from the DoD,
then (cue jaws music). . .
Er, we couldn't get sharks. We have ... sea bass.
They are mutant sea bass.
This clearly is an easy topic for mockery, but the calculations
for the amount of force to impart in order to ensure the projectile
lands softly on the roof are trivial. It would be very easy to
adjust the cannon to account for varying weight payloads.
The bigger problems to overcome are misfires and training the
"projectiles."
It's not a violation of patent law to build a patented device,
only to profit from selling one.
Just in case that was what was standing in the way of you bulding
one.
This freakin' rocks the house.
Technology rules.
I was promised Nuclear Cars, Coilguns and Man Cannons in the near
future, and dammit I want them all.
In other words the Man Cannon (control yourself!) is
designed simply to enhance a man's natural abilities...
So does it make the noise the $6 Million Man makes when you are
catapulted?
Can this be used for commuting?
PL, keep the good ideas under your hat for now in case you decide
to file that method claim yourself.
Dave, there's probably already a patent on ballistic transport. I'll make my money in cool leather jackets, made especially for cannon commuting.
BarryJV: u need a patent lawyer even worse than PL!
Da law:
"[W]hoever without authority makes, uses,
offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United
States . . . infringes the patent." (emphasis added)
I went to try to confirm that for ya, PL, but the USPTO search
site said "maximum number of users reached."
Darn that Bill Clinton, pulling money out of the patent office for
the general weal!
Here we go:
http://tinyurl.com/qybr5
Don't think it say nothing about commuting though.
For the mildly to non interested. Getting to the rooftop on a
raid is a problem swat has to deal with. Our current model is this
thing they call The Ladder. It is, well, a ladder.
Some of the guys at the firearms training center I go to every year
do cross training in eastern europe. They found out what the
spetsnatz do last year. Our russian friends take a long pole and
place it at the foot of the structure, leaning it away from the
wall and anchored by team members. A guy in full gear runs straight
at the wall, grabbing the pole on the way. He picks his feet up and
runs up the wall while holding onto the pole. In my head, they are
all wearing big shoes and clown noses ...
Oh, yeah: nice Harvey Birdman reference. That got a hearty laugh on both obscurity and aptness.
Catapults, Dave? I'm talking cannons--completely different. Please file for me, with the proceeds from my enormous revenues to go to Reason to buy a new server :)
Will file as soon as your check clears, PL. Always good doing business. We should have the first Office Action in about 4 years.
KyleG:Air cannon? Ever heard of goddamned
tramampoline?
Steady on, old boy. Let's get it working on people first before we
try it on trams.
It's a nice thought, but a bit bulky - I'm sure SWAT would be
happier with jump packs.
Prior art! Prior art! Wile E. Coyote shot himself out of the
cannon at least once...
...or there is that 1930's movie "Tsyrk" (The Circus), where they
actually shot a live actress (was it Lyubov' Orlova?) out of a
cannon.
Cynical Bastard:
If these references weren't "enabling," then they ain't prior
art.
People out of cannons, sure. But people out of cannons as method
for commuting? I doubt it.
That Wile E. Coyote sure is some kind of supergenius. If I'm ever
Bill Gates rich or better, I'm buying the rights to the Road
Runner-Coyote characters and doing a movie with the ending EVERY
SINGLE PERSON IN THE WORLD wants to see. I mean I friggin' HATE the
Roadrunner.
People out of cannons, sure. But people out of cannons as method
for commuting? I doubt it.
That Wile E. Coyote sure is some kind of supergenius. If I'm ever
Bill Gates rich or better, I'm buying the rights to the Road
Runner-Coyote characters and doing a movie with the ending EVERY
SINGLE PERSON IN THE WORLD wants to see. I mean I friggin' HATE the
Roadrunner.
Ever heard of goddamned tramampoline?
For safety's sake, just in case he misses the jump, we should be
standing by with a muh'fuckin' bambulance.
http://www.9-1-1magazine.com/FeatureDetail.asp?ArticleID=291
I'm sorry, I thought this was the gay male video section of the site. damn misleading titles...
Dave W.
Da law:
"[W]hoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or
sells any patented invention, within the United States . . .
infringes the patent." (emphasis added)
By that definition if e.g. Sony loses the patent battle over the
use of force-feedback technology, everyone who bought a PS3 will be
guilty of patent infringement, not just the company that made and
sold it. Does that sound likely to you?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245