Jesse Walker | May 5, 2006
It's always the smaller religions that get the shaft.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Consulting with mystic, omniscient dwarves? Maybe this judge is secretly Green Lantern.
Huh. Didn't say that he was fired for believing goofy shit, only
that he was found incompetent and had violated professional ethics
by showing bias in a case.
And even if he were fired for consulting gnomes or
whatever the hell, I'm just not going to get my libertarian panties
in a twist over it.
Oops, I meant boxers. Boxers, people. Ahem. Oooh, drinking
time.
Seeing into the future??? Invisible mystical dwarfs??? How ridiculus! Why can't he believe in something reasonable, like the resurrection of Jesus or Moses parting the Red Sea?
They didn't dismiss him for "what he believed," they dismissed
him because he was a lunatic that "was incompetent, had shown bias
in a case he was trying and had criticized court procedure."
This should've been filed under "Friday Fun Link."
three mystic dwarfs -- Armand, Luis and Angel
Aw, hell, it's as valid as any other religious belief.
I'm with Jamie Kelly...it's drinking time.
This does bring up that interesting legal point--even for believers--what's the line between religion and insanity? If I'm a government employer and I have an employee that believes in some crazy religion and acts pretty loony, is there a point where I can fire him for his "religious" views or actions? Short of the employee doing something obviously illegal, of course. The kneejerk answer is "no", but I think there is some magic line out there. It's kind of like the question in some countries about whether Scientology is a cult or a religion.
Pro has an excellent point. If a lot of people, and people in
power, believe in some nutty religious ideas, it's okay.
I like the fact his mystic dwarf friends had names. Imagine.
"My name is Armand. This is Luis and Angel."
They didn't dismiss him for "what he believed," they
dismissed him because he was a lunatic that "was incompetent, had
shown bias in a case he was trying and had criticized court
procedure."
Six of one...
I like the fact his mystic dwarf friends had names.
Imagine.
"My name is Armand. This is Luis and Angel."
Peter K.,
heeheehee I thought that was a nice touch.
I got a similar mental picture...lol!
If his mystic dwarf friends aren't real, how does he know their
names?
I just hope he has the strength and courage to fight this
injustice.
if Phillippine law doesn't specifically prohibit judges from consulting mystic dwarves, then they have to give him his job back, in a strict constructionist reading of the law
I think the triple-dwarf theology is kind of weirdly sweet. And at least no one's been burned at the stake or beheaded in the name of Armand.
And at least no one's been burned at the stake or beheaded
in the name of Armand.
Wait until Tuesday, oh just wait until Tuesday.
"And at least no one's been burned at the stake or beheaded in
the name of Armand."
Wasn't that in Interview with the Vampire or something?
I love the idea of the judge consulting three dwarves, Snow
White and the Holy Trinity.
Too bad we can't fire Bush for asking his imaginary friend Jesus to
help him decide which brown people to kill.
Religions are all based on a belief that their fairy tales are
better than yours.
I agree,it is drinking time. Unfortunately, a good portion of my ice cold Coors went though my nose upon reading the first paragraph of that story.
1) Influence Judge and give him ability to see into the
future.
2) ??????????????????
3) Profit!
Ah, AFORF, that was brilliant. But I have a couple of serious
questions. Like, why are we only talking about Armand? What about
Luis and Angel? And just how does this 'trinity' work? (Because, I
gotta tell you, the Christian trinity don't make no sense, no how.)
Are they separate but equal? (Harhar) Separate but unequal? (If
they were a band would they be 'Armand and the Mystic Dwarves'?) Or
are they some kind of three-in-one deal, perhaps joined by a
'common energy'? Moreover, what is their nature - entirely mystic,
both human or mystic etc?
(By the way, these were all questions asked during the first
centuries of Christianity - the 'wrong answers' became
heresies...)
Now I've only spoken to Luis, but he assures me that Judge Floro got a raw deal. Luis is right. Luis is always right.
The fact that we have moved into the hermaneutics and exegetics
of the Armand trinity convinces me that vacations are in order all
around, or drinks, or something.
I may go start this religion online in Second Life.
Always wanted little culties following me around.
My first thought was to equate this hack with AL Judge Roy Moore. Removed from the bench for failing to uphold the law, he screams "I'm being persecuted for my beliefs".
why are we only talking about Armand? What about Luis and
Angel?
Because the true believers know ARMAND is the one. Luis
and Angel sit by his side and bring his word, BUT IT IS THE WORD OF
ARMAND! So says the prophet AFORF, in all caps, as ARMAND commands
it.
are they some kind of three-in-one deal, perhaps joined by a
'common energy'?
Before all other mystic dwarves, there was ARMAND. Through his
power, Luis and Angel evolved from clams from the planet Remulac
over 5,000,000 years ago. I have a book, Diuretix, that
explains all this. It's available for only $19.95.
Luis is right. Luis is always right.
Maurkov is a heretic, and will be punished, along with all who
follow him, when ARMAND stops doing porn and comes to rule with his
IRON ROD!
This does bring up that interesting legal point--even for
believers--what's the line between religion and
insanity?
I think it has to do with how much you allow your religion to
interfere with your ability to handle day-to-day life. If you know
a hurricane is coming to your area next week, and you stock up on
supplies and hurricane-proof your home, and then pray to God that
you make it through okay, that's not insane. But if you don't make
any preparations EXCEPT to pray to God, believing that's all that
is necessary, that's where you start having problems.
Jennifer - What about those people who go on the news right after a tornado has destroyed their house, and say things like "God saved me because he loves me. This is proof of God's love."
Jennifer - What about those people who go on the news right
after a tornado has destroyed their house, and say things like "God
saved me because he loves me. This is proof of God's
love."
Solipsists. Or perhaps people who simply feel that looking for the
silver lining, however thin it may be, is better than brooding on
what was lost.
Speaking of Those People....
The hurricane is coming, and everybody gets ready to bail out;
everybody except one old guy, who says, "I'm stayin' put- God will
take care of me."
The neighbors say, "uh huh." and depart.
The wind and the rain come, and trees fall down, and the power goes
off, and the old guy is sitting in his living room in the dark, and
a guy comes up and beats on the door: "Come on Grampaw, I came back
to get some stuff with my pickup, and I surely got room in there
for you."
The old man says, "I'm stayin' put- God will take care of
me."
The guy with the pickup says, "uh huh," and away he goes.
Next morning, it dawns clear and sunny, but the water is coming up
fast. It comes up the front steps, and shortly thereafter, it comes
right in the front door. Later that day, the old man is sitting on
the upstairs window sill, watching the debris float past, and a
couple of firemen drift by in a boat. They offer to take him to dry
land, but he won't budge. " God will take care of me."
Later that evening, the TV helcopter is taking pictures of the
catastrophe, and they spot this poor, forlorn old man, clinging to
his chimney as the current tries to wash him off the roof. They
plead with him to let them rescue him, but he will have none of it.
"My God will take care of me," he says to them, and waves them
away.
Still later that evening, he finds himself standing, dripping muddy
water all over the clean carpet, in St Peter's office. St Peter
looks him up and down, and says, "Now what in the hell are you
doing here.?"
The old man says, "I don't know; I trusted God to take care of me,
but He let me down."
St Peter laughs, loud and hard, and says, "You dumb bastard
hillbilly- we sent you a pickup truck, a boat, and a goddamned
HELICOPTER, and you were too dumb to get in." Then he reaches
forward and pull a big golden lever on his desk; a trapdoor opens
beneath the old man and he falls into Hell.
"Some people..." mutters St Peter.
Wait until Tuesday, oh just wait until Tuesday.
Shut up you fool. You'll ruin everything.
Ken, here's one (OT) for you:
Why was the IRS agent suspicious of the athiest?
Because he had no invisible means of support. **rimshot**
If a judge uses his religious or other non-rational beliefs,
instead of the law, to decide cases, then he should be dismissed.
This applies just as much to Christians, Jews, Mormons,
environmentalists, etc, as it does to dwarf-worshippers. (Despite
my status as Papist Avenger, I would say the same of a judge who
decides a case based on an apparition of the Virgin Mary.) There is
always the option of recusal if a judge considers it impossible to
separate such beliefs from his decision.
Note that I'm talking about judges here, not legislators. If a
legislator wants to base his votes on the dictates of his rice
krispies, he should be free to do so so long as his constituents
elect him. But a judge has to apply the law, not make it.
A zebra is killed by a lion at his favorite watering hole, and
immediately whisked up to mammalian heaven. St Peter greets him at
the pearly gates and asks him if he has any questions about his
earthly life before entering heavenly bliss.
The zebra has only one question: "Am I black with white stripes or
white with black stripes?" St Peter admits that he can't tell, and
advises the martyred zebra to ask God himself when he gets a
chance.
So the zebra asks God the same question, only to get the response,
"YOU ARE WHAT YOU ARE!" Puzzled, the zebra returns
to Peter to see what he thinks of that.
"You must be white with black stripes," Peter explains. "If you
were black with white stripes, he would have said 'YOU
IS WHAT YOU IS!'"
PS, I'm not a racist, but I found that funny as hell.
I love when I hear someone say, "I'm not a racist, but," because it means I'm about to hear something extremely racist and hilarious. You disappointed me , crimethink.
I love when I hear someone say, "I'm not a racist, but," because
it means I'm about to hear something extremely racist and
hilarious. You disappointed me , crimethink.
Comment by: the other Mark at May 6, 2006 09:32 PM
I, too, thought it was pretty funny, but I was not disappointed,...
probably because I had no expectations. I love a good joke and I
consider very few things to be off limits.
I have wondered what some would say... maybe thoreau?
Hey thoreau, what say you about opinions based on empirical
evidence, and them being the same as, say, the belief in mystic
dwarfs?
Well, hey-separation of church and state! I guess if he can't follow that, then he should be removed from his job.
Mr Language Person,
Mr Tolkien would seem to disagree with you. And if you think you
can match linguistic credentials with The Master, well, you must be
Chuck Norris.
Florentino Floro seems rational. I move that he replace
Ginsburger or Thomas.
Speaking of mystical beings, I'm waiting for V. Fox to cross the
river and starting working. He'll probably get George's
job@$8/hr.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245