Nick Gillespie | May 5, 2006
The developing story in the Patrick Kennedy car crash conflagration? That the coppers were prevented from administering a sobriety test to the Rhode Island congressman (who claims prescription medication wuz the culprit):
Two police union officials, who were not at the scene, complained that the Rhode Island congressman and son of Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., looked like he'd been drinking after crashing into a barrier near the Capitol building at 2:45 a.m.
"The driver exited the vehicle and he was observed to be staggering," Officer Greg Baird, the acting head of the Capitol police union, wrote in a letter to his boss, according to the newspaper Roll Call.
Lou Cannon, president of the Washington chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, said Kennedy looked intoxicated.
"It's my understanding that he had an odor of alcohol about him and he was unsteady on his feet," Cannon said.
More here. Do note the secondhand nature of said testimonials.
Reader Alan Vanneman wonders whether PK was high on those newfangled morning glory seeds that the kids aren't doing these days. I'm wondering if Patrick Kennedy's low-impact, non-fatal car crash is just the latest manifestation of the Stupid Grandson Theory, which argues that Joseph Schumpeter's "three generations from overalls to overalls" pertains to the quality of familial scandals every bit as much as to the loss of family wealth.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Kennedys are all fun and games until someone dies. He's smart to restrict his drunken driving to Capitol Hill.
The Kennedys are America's royal family.
They behave like a bunch of bozos but there's not a damn thing
anyone can do about it.
Enjoy.
And Rhode Island, too, Scott.
He couldn't find Providence on a map, but still my friends and
family back home keep electing him.
I bet that Inheritence Tax is looking pretty good right about now, eh libertoids? ;-)
I don't think money is the root of the Kennedy family's problems, Joe. But you're right about there being an exception to prove every rule.
Except, joe, that the Kennedy fortune has been safe from the inheritance tax for nigh on 70 years and three generations. Trusts and whatnot.
The late and very much lamented Spy magazine from the late '80's once listed some Kennedy or another's qualifications for elective office as "surviving birth." That still seems to apply.
RC,
That's why need to break up fortunes before they become
multi-generational. It's the heirs that will turn those dollars
into political power, and dedicate themselves full time to
exploiting loopholes.
I hate Patrick Kennedy. He has aides. One of his aides got me kicked out of a Stephen Malkmus concert at the Black Cat for buying drinks for a someone underage. I will never again be wooed by any female who has been in the presence of a Kennedy.
The question is, where is the female corpse???? Their must be one, every time a Kennedy screws up a woman dies......
Paris Hilton is the best kind of rich kid. I'm sure she's
running through Grandpappy Conrad's money at breakneck pace, and
she appears to have no political ambition at all.
Any new inheritance tax would leave an escape route for the really
old money, we can be sure of that. We all have face up and take our
share of blame for failing to be born to children of children of
people who made lots of money before taxes became confiscatory.
The supreme irony in all of this is that Grandpa Joe made his fortune from...selling booze.
Why is it a defense to take "prescription drugs"? If true, I bet
they say "don't operate heavy machinery." He's still under the
influence and his excuse is just an admission of guilt.
Grandchildren are very good at pissing away money. No need for a
tax.
Randolph Carter said:
"I hate Patrick Kennedy. He has aides."
Isn't the time long past when people with aides were stigmatized
this way? Patrick Kennedy has aides, and he's living with aides.
Doesn't he deserve our encouragement and support?
In the meantime, George W., Laura Bush, and Dick Cheney have three DWI convictions and one vehicular manslaughter on their records.
Too bad he didn't run his car into a windmill , then he could just say he was 'protecting' the aesthetic 'view'.
In the meantime, George W., Laura Bush, and Dick Cheney have
three DWI convictions and one vehicular manslaughter on their
records.
That's because they lacked the powerful friends of the
Kennedys....
I'm opposed to the "death tax", aka the inheritance tax, much
like any other tax. Reducing tax rates makes it easier to raise
them again than it is if you eliminate them and try to reinstate
them.
In other words abolishing a tax is leaps and bounds better than
reducing tax rates.
That said, I can think of better taxes to abolish. 1) Any and all
payroll taxes,which may possibly be the stupidest taxes out there
due to the increased unemployment. 2) Any and all investment taxes
(e.g. capital gains), which again increase unemployment, and
underemployment. They also increase dependency on government
handouts by discouraging saving for a rainy day or retirement. 3)
Any tax on the working poor, such as Social Security and
Medicaid/Medicare. Taxing the working poor at the same time that
you have government transfer payments of various sorts to poor
people is mindblowingly stupid.
In favor of abolishing the death tax: It reduces government power,
just as cutting off revenues of any sort does. what do the
self-made rich do once they become rich? Hopefully they keep
foolishly working and doing what they do best, which is creating
jobs. If giving the increased wealth to family heirs is what it
takes to incentivise someone to create more wealth and jobs once
they already have more than they could possibly spend, then I'm all
for abolishing the death tax.
That said, it seems abolishing the capital gains tax
accomplishesmuch the same thing, but with clearer consequences
towards new business formation etc.
The late and very much lamented Spy magazine from the late
'80's
They also once had an article that mirrored (and pre-dated) the
Suck piece - about the increasing cretinization of once noble
families: The Barrymores, The Hemingways, etc. The Kennedys were
the prime example.
Note: the Kennedy's got their family fortune via Joe Kennedy.
Joe Kennedy got his fortune by being a drug kingpin, or a drug
trafficker, or whatever the current en vogue term is for that sort
of thing. He was a booze smuggler during (alcohol)
Prohibition.
It is perfectly understandable that he thought being rich was an
undeserved thing considering how he got rich himself. It is also
perfectly understandable that his heirs grew up thinking the same
thing. The fact that they also are a bunch of lowlifes living like
decadent bums gives them no reason to do anything to "help the
rich". Indeed, it is perfectly understandable that they loathe
other rich people as much as they loathe how they themselves got
rich and feel guilty over it.
What they don't understand is that most rich people today in
America, however you define rich, got that way by creating jobs,
and by creating products and services that either didn't exist
before, or existed in worse quality, or existed in a more expensive
form. They got rich because they deserved it in other words, unlike
the Kennedys.
So when someone like Senator Ted Kennedy is opposed to an across
the board tax cut, he is mad because "the rich get the biggest
benefit". He is so intent on beating up people like himself that he
can't see that not everyone who is rich is a bum like himself, and
that most of them help the needy in their own way, some for selfish
reasons, but is the reason relevant when you help the needy?
Here endeth my Kennedy rant.
"I hate Patrick Kennedy. He has aides."
"Isn't the time long past when people with aides were stigmatized
this way? Patrick Kennedy has aides, and he's living with aides.
Doesn't he deserve our encouragement and support?"
Yes. What's more, we should no longer think of aides as "something
that only Kennedys get." None of us should believe that just
because we do not engage in the so-called "Kennedy lifestyle," that
we can never get aides. The truth is that the risk of contracting
aides is growing among the general population.
If you have ever engaged in unprotected sex in a Malibu, New
England, or D.C. hot tub full of starlets; or traveled abroad to
Geneva or Kyoto since 1985; or shared limousines with a drug user
... then you, too, are at increased risk of having aides.
And we should all recognize, Stevo, that our government has willfully ignored the aides problem for years, out of fear that if aides were ever eliminated, an epidemic of personal responsibility would ensue.
I'm not a fan of the current Kennedy clan and would normally
feel as sarcasticly amused as anyone else by this. And yes, it is
deplorable that the cops didn't give him a breathalyzer test, when
you know that would be the first action taken for Joe Nobody
instead of Joe Bigshot. But according to the AP report:
Kennedy said he returned to his Capitol Hill home on Wednesday
evening after a final series of votes in Congress and took
"prescribed" amounts of Phenergan and Ambien, another prescribed
drug that he occasionally takes to fall asleep. "Some time around
2:45 a.m., I drove the few blocks to the Capitol Complex believing
I needed to vote," his second statement said. "Apparently, I was
disoriented from the medication." In the later statement, he
repeated, "At no time before the incident did I consume any
alcohol."
Yikes, Ambien again. And no, he says he wasn't driving on Ambien,
he took it at his home. Unless given other evidence I tend to
believe him. The same thing happened recently to a close friend of
mine: sleep-driving. She took a heavy dose of Ambien, went to
sleep, then left her apartment (in her nightgown) and started
driving. Hit something and blew out both tires on the drivers side.
Woke up in the middle of the road (luckily no cops). No alcohol
involved.
This medication has some gnarly hypnotic effects. There are have
been numerous reports lately of Ambien inducing weird behavior--
driving, having sex, eating half the contents of your
refrigerator-- while the people are asleep. This stuff is turning
people into zombies.
Joe Kennedy did at least 2 good things in his life. He ran rum,
and he saved RKO pictures.
He also did Gloria Swanson, but that's something else
altogether.
Kevin
The supreme irony in all of this is that Grandpa Joe made
his fortune from...selling booze.
Didn't they learn anything from Scarface?
There should be an Oswald for every Kennedy.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245