Reason Magazine
- reason.com
- reason.tv
- reason.org
- Donate
- Site Search:
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsadvertisements
And the Winner in the Human Events 10 Most Harmful Government Programs Goes To...
Heavy-duty Hit & Run commenter Mr. F Le Mur sends along this list of the 10 Most Harmful Government Programs, as compiled by the conservative cabal running Human Events. First, a note on the judging process:
This year, 38 panelists participated. They ranged from Larry Kudlow, host of CNBC's "Kudlow and Company," to Eagle Forum President Phyllis Schlafly, to FreedomWorks Chairman Dick Armey, to Concerned Women for America President Wendy Wright, to Center for Immigration Studies Director Mark Krikorian, to George Mason University Professor of Economics Walter Williams.
I won't tip what's number one--you get one guess--but will note some of the odder (IMO) choices: "contraceptive funding," "earmarking," and "Davis-Bacon." It's not that these are good by any stretch, but are they really the most harmful? And where o where is the drug war?
Timothy|4.11.06 @ 10:33AM|#
Most of them make sense, but contraceptive funding? I mean, really. Sure, the government shouldn't be paying for that sort of thing, but at least it keeps people from making more people.
|4.11.06 @ 10:35AM|#
Wait, wait, wait . . . you're surprised that Schlafly et al. consider contraceptive funding among the Top 10 most harmful? Nick, Nick, Nick . . . it defies God. That's why they put it on there. Meanwhile, to their ilk, the drug war is a good thing. This is why I will never, ever cast my lot with modern conservatives. Ever.
|4.11.06 @ 10:37AM|#
Interestingly, the judges are all right wing Republican fanatics. Not even one intellectual moderate among them. Only a moron would consider this list unbiased and fair.
|4.11.06 @ 10:41AM|#
Contraceptive funding ranks at #5, but
BATFE harassment of legal gunsmiths doesn't even rate a
mention?
Feh.
|4.11.06 @ 10:43AM|#
You don't often see the word "range" used that way.
Wow, all the way from the Eagle Forum to CWA? OK, just as long as
it isn't a mutual admiration society or anything.
|4.11.06 @ 10:47AM|#
I don't know about worst government program, but certainly the one that had the greatest impact--I think it was a U.S. military program-- is the program that developed and launched the internet.
|4.11.06 @ 10:51AM|#
The best government program?
The Birth of the Internet
While computers were not a new concept in the 1950s, there were
relatively few computers in existence and the field of computer
science was still in its infancy. Most of the advances in
technology at the time - cryptography, radar, battlefield
communications - were due to military operations during World War
II, and it was, in fact, government activities that led to the
development of the Internet.
On October 4, 1957, the Soviets launched Sputnik, man's first foray
into outer space, and the U.S. government under President
Eisenhower subsequently launched an aggressive military campaign to
compete with and surpass the Soviet activities. From the launch of
Sputnik and the U.S.S.R. testing its first intercontinental
ballistic missile, the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) was
born. ARPA was the U.S. government's research agency for all space
and strategic missile research. In 1958, NASA was formed, and the
activities of ARPA moved away from aeronautics and focused mainly
on computer science and information processing. One of ARPA's goals
was to connect mainframe computers at different universities around
the country so that they would be able to communicate using a
common language and a common protocol. Thus the ARPAnet -- the
world's first multiple-site computer network -- was created in
1969.
The original ARPAnet eventually grew into the Internet. The
Internet was based on the concept that there would be multiple
independent networks that began with the ARPAnet as the pioneering
packet-switching network but would soon include packet satellite
networks and ground-based packet radio networks.
For further information on the origin of the Internet, see:
A Brief History of the Internet
A Brief Timeline of the Internet
Short History of the Internet by Bruce Sterling
|4.11.06 @ 10:57AM|#
This list really gives a sense of how effective Norquist's
campaign to coopt the Christian Right to the agenda of economic
conservatives has been.
Exactly one religious conservative boogeyman is on the list.
Meanwhile, Social Security, Medicare, Rarm Subsidies and Medicaid -
not one of which I've ever heard a "cultural right" type spout off
angrily about - make the list. Completely absent, however, is
AFDC/Welfare, which was by far the poster child of the "government
aid to the poor undermines society" argument, but which is a much
smaller part of the federal budget and imposes a much lower cost on
business.
Remember when "Focus on the Family" turned into "all tax cuts all
the time" in 2001-2002? Absolutely a brilliant campaign by
Norquist. No doubt he'll spend many an afternoon mediating between
the Aryan Brotherhood and the Latin Kings, and facilitating the
cigarette trade, during his upcoming years in a federal pound me in
the ass prison.
|4.11.06 @ 11:03AM|#
I really liked how they made sure to point out when it was a Democratic President and a Dem Congress, but only once did they do Republican Prez, Republican Congress. The other times, they simply named the sponsors.
Dan T.|4.11.06 @ 11:04AM|#
Social Security has destroyed so many lives...so many dead
bodies lie in its wake...
What a stupid f'n list.
Matt Walker|4.11.06 @ 11:15AM|#
My favorite was the cheap attempt to praise George Bush under
the McCain-Feingold entry.
"President George W. Bush, even while doubting its
constitutionality, signed a law"
|4.11.06 @ 11:22AM|#
What can you expect from a group of people that listed "The Feminine Mystique" as one of the most dangerous books ever but failed to include "The Turner Diaries?" I look forward to next year's wingnut "ten worst" list. Very cheap entertainment.
|4.11.06 @ 11:23AM|#
Contraceptive funding in a tie with farm subsidies...
The credibility of the entire selection process may consequently be
regarded as "nil."
|4.11.06 @ 11:26AM|#
Matt: Noting that Bush signed a law he believed was unconstitutional is not intended to praise him.
|4.11.06 @ 11:43AM|#
I thought it was a pretty decent list until the 'Contraceptive Funding' part induced a massive eyeroll. I can just picture that bunch of prune-faced old scolds, wringing their hands over the horror (the horror, I tell you!) of 16-year-olds (gasp!) having sex. 16-year-olds have been having sex for how long??? And those guys haven't gotten used to the idea yet? At least the little twerps are using birth control now. And yeah, like they're going to tell their parents. Oh sure, my parents are the people I discuss ALL the details of my sex life with! Where's that clue-by-four so I can hit those people over the head with it? I have to agree with Phil. Conservatives were pretty cool until they became infected by the god-botherers. Now that they don't even try to reduce the size of government anymore, what good are they?
|4.11.06 @ 11:56AM|#
The objection to the "contraceptive funding" program is to the funding of contraception by the federal government, not the existence of contraceptives themselves, or to teenagers having access to rubbers. Not surprising that many hair-trigger commenters here can't seem to tell the difference. However, agreement that this is pretty small potatoes when you compare it with the sinkhole that is the drug war.
|4.11.06 @ 12:34PM|#
Don, I didn't get that impression when I read the commentary posted on their site. Their biggest gripes were that parents were uninformed and the proximity to abortion providers at the clinics. I don't think it's my job as a taxpayer to buy anyone else's condoms either, but it certainly doesn't fall in the ring anywhere close to Social Security.
|4.11.06 @ 12:34PM|#
Hmm. Now, I'm for Social Security thing, and I'm as against farm subsidies as the next libertarian, but you'd think forced Indian relocation would have made the list SOMEwhere...
|4.11.06 @ 12:36PM|#
Wow, I smoke wayy too much pot. "Social Security thing" was supposed to read "Social Security reform."
|4.11.06 @ 1:10PM|#
Don, if you can find me one instance of any of the people on that list not opposing teen sex ed programs, or access to contraceptives generally, or the use of artificial contraception, or anything but abstinence-only education, I will PayPal you $5.
|4.11.06 @ 7:29PM|#
War is good for destroying your enemies and increasing the profits of defense contractors.
|4.12.06 @ 9:43AM|#
Don, if you can find me one instance of any of the people on
that list not opposing teen sex ed programs, or access to
contraceptives generally, or the use of artificial contraception,
or anything but abstinence-only education, I will PayPal you
$5.
Without checking the list very far at all: David Boaz, Chris
Edwards, and Michael Cannon, for starters.
You can PayPal your $5 to the Reason Foundation.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245