Ken Silber looks at the universe according to Hoyle.
Julian Sanchez | March 30, 2006
Ken Silber looks at the universe according to Hoyle.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
|3.30.06 @ 10:12AM|#
Theories like Hoyle's are one of the reasons I think many religiously inclined proponents of Intelligent Design are somewhat misguided. Is the typical anti-Darwinist going to be happy if schools started presenting something like Raelian creation theories?
[Insert standard boilerplate denouncing public schools as Prussian influenced social soul destroying institutions and such]
|3.30.06 @ 2:14PM|#
"Still, it is a worrisome sign for scientific literacy that nobody really fills their shoes today. "
I think that Bill Bryson does a pretty good job.
Search for his book "A Short History of Nearly Everything".
|3.31.06 @ 6:54AM|#
proponents of Intelligent Design
If the physical universe implies an intelligent designer, what does the intelligent designer imply?
|3.31.06 @ 9:23AM|#
Neil deGrasse Tyson is a possible heir to Sagan. He's not ubiquitous just yet, but he is popping up more and more often. He did a Nova multi-part special on astrophysics and was on the presidential commission that dealt with the "vision" for manned spaceflight. He's also one of the "Superstar Teachers" for the Teaching Company.
|3.31.06 @ 9:29AM|#
Nested turtles all the way down of course.