Reason.com
Bereft of Sex Scandals, Bored Congressional Staffers Turn to Wikipedia
Editors at Wikipedia have compiled an amusing/appalling list of edits made to Wikipedia entries by IP addresses allocated to the House and Senate. The editors also threw in a list of the "potential staffers involved," who were no doubt trying to distinguish a Freyesque "essential truth" from annoying facts by replacing entries with staff bios and removing "unflattering quotes." Occasional Reason contributor Declan McCullagh notes:
One edit listed White House press secretary Scott McClellan under the entry for "douche." Another said of Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma) that: "Coburn was voted the most annoying Senator by his peers in Congress. This was due to Senator Coburn being a huge douche-bag."
This juvenalia is, of course, thoroughly bipartisan. Another change to the Iraq invasion entry shows that the anonymous congressional editor played up the dubious connections between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein.
More here.
Most Popular Stories
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Wisconsin: 65 Percent Believe Gov’t Workers Receive Better Retirement Benefits (5.29)
- Wisconsin: 69 Percent Favor 401(k)-Style Accounts for Government Workers (5.29)
- 17 Percent of Wisconsinites Favor Disbursing Retirement Benefits to Gov’t Workers Before Age 65 (5.29)
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|1.31.06 @ 4:22PM|#
I always suspected that Congressional staffers were a lot like the back-biting douche-bags at the Model United Nations events I used to attend as a student.
|1.31.06 @ 6:03PM|#
To some people, things like Wikipedia are valuable tools for the furtherance of education and the search for truth. And to some people, everything in the world is just another tool for self-aggrandizement. Or vicarious self-aggrandizement, as the case may be.
I always suspected that a lot of Congressional staffers, pages, etc. are worse types than Congressmen themselves, if that's possible. A Congressman at least might have some ideas or ideals he can promote; a staffer just hangs around the rich and powerful.
|1.31.06 @ 6:19PM|#
Congressmen, leave the childish name calling and libellous articles for the floor of the Senate, or the Uncyclopedia.