Reason.com
New at Reason
Dems play libertarians at Alito's hearing, Abramoff has pols' eyes tearing, and why the Dow's due for some veering—in the new Reason Express.
Most Popular Stories
- 5 Classic Teen Sex-and-Drug Freakouts: Rainbow Parties, Butt-Chugging, And So Much More (By Which We Mean Less) (5.27)
- Government Beneficiaries and Other Fairy Tales (5.26)
- Are We Headed for a Fight with China? (5.28)
- Lessons From the United Fruit Company (5.28)
- Do Organic Consumers Shop Exclusively at the Jerk Store? (5.26)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|1.10.06 @ 4:06PM|#
The article on nuking Iran is pretty scary.
|1.10.06 @ 7:14PM|#
ADM
Supermarket to the World
Nature of what's to come
Resourceful by Nature
|1.10.06 @ 9:11PM|#
"Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has already demonstrated the problem for Democrats: She sounded like Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) in making the case that government is too untrustworthy to let one party control the House, Senate, and White House. She does not really believe that, and voters know it."
But that doesn't matter. In a deliberately adversarial system, it is the pursuit of total victory by each side that keeps the game honest, not their modesty and good faith. The public is perfectly capable of realizing what it means to "vote against."
|1.10.06 @ 10:13PM|#
Native, my sentiments exactly.
So Bush was really planning to take out Iran all along? Hmmm. Snake oil, anyone?
Bush has demonstrated stupidity, but I don't believe even he is that stupid.
Then again....
|1.10.06 @ 10:17PM|#
The nuking Iran link is scary. But I for one also find a nuclear Iran scary.
The snake oil in that link is the implication that Iran has no particular ill intentions towards the US and only wants to defend itself from Isreal. That isn't even semi-believable.
Genuine objectivity is so hard to find.