Matt Welch | December 30, 2005
The UK's former ambassador to the hellhole known as Uzbekistan says Tony Blair's Foreign Office "is now seeking to block" his forthcoming tell-all, specifically by suppressing some of his diplomatic cables that criticized the Labour Government's acceptance of intelligence gained by Uzbek torture. He has now posted those correspondences online.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Do the Uzbek's really torture people? Or do they simply subject
them to humiliating, cruel, painful, degrading, uncomfortable, but
not life threatening conditions?
There's a difference, you know. Or at least that's what everybody
keeps telling me.
I have no idea why I put an apostrophe on Uzbek to make it plural. My apologies.
Not to mention staff meetings. I have definitely been in some conference rooms where uncomfortable and humiliating things were happening.
"Not to mention staff meetings. I have definitely been in some
conference rooms where uncomfortable and humiliating things were
happening."
Yep, that would get a hearty round of applause at the local
Communist Party HQ - equating a situation which you chose to put
yourself into (your job) with a situation you were placed in at
gunpoint.
After all, your boss merely exploits you...
Not a single Iraq dove - not a single one - has ever provided to
Saddam Hussein 1/100th the level of support that this
administration gives to Karimov.
George Bush voted in favor of secret police and torture rooms
before he voted against them.
Don't give this "spreading democracy" bullshit.
Not a single Iraq dove - not a single one - has ever
provided to Saddam Hussein 1/100th the level of support that this
administration gives to Karimov.
Gave to Karimov, perhaps, but US-Uzbek ties have soured
considerably in recent months. Following the Bush Administration's
demand for an international inquiry regarding the Andijan massacre,
Karimov suspended all anti-terrorism cooperation with the US and
demanded that the US military vacate its base in Uzbekistan, which
it's in the process of doing. Karimov has also bolstered his ties
with Russia and China, neither of whom could care less if he
carries out another Andijan - hell, the Chinese might give him
pointers.
None of this is to say that the Administration was wrong in
(belatedly) getting tougher on Karimov, but you can't say they've
just turned a blind eye to his behavior in the name of retaining
military and anti-terrorism support.
Keep in mind that the US "demand" only happened _after_ Murray's story first came out. The Feds did turn a blind eye until they were forced by the new publicity to scuttle for political cover, like cockroaches when the lights are turned on.
Once, my car wouldn't start because Uzbeks drank the battery dry. (1000 points toward the purchase of a Reason t-shirt to the first poster to get the reference.)
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245