Two lonely hearts couldn't find love even in the misfit-matching world of internet dating. Naturally, they sued. And won:
Civil Court Judge Diane Lebedeff awarded one woman, identified by the pseudonym Jennifer Doe, the $1,000 she had paid for a six-month membership after the woman said she had met no one through the service. The judge awarded the other woman, Debra Roe, the $3,790 she paid for a 54-month deal.
Because Great Expectations' contract guaranteed no specific number of referrals each month, the service could legally charge no more than $25 per member, the judge said.
Putting aside the issue of why the hell New York gets to decide how much dating services cost, my gold-digging instincts tell me that there's only one reason to pay $3000 to pimp yourself out over the ether: to meet others with a little too much cash on their hands. So a price cap kinda kills the allure.
Whole thing here. New York's hilarious "Dating Service Consumer Bill of Rights" here.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245