Reason.com
New at Reason
If the only option is to turn the internet's roots over to the "international community," Julian Sanchez would rather take a page from Sammy Davis Jr. and say "Yes ICANN."
Most Popular Stories
- 5 Classic Teen Sex-and-Drug Freakouts: Rainbow Parties, Butt-Chugging, And So Much More (By Which We Mean Less) (5.27)
- Government Beneficiaries and Other Fairy Tales (5.26)
- Lessons From the United Fruit Company (5.28)
- Are We Headed for a Fight with China? (5.28)
- Do Organic Consumers Shop Exclusively at the Jerk Store? (5.26)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- 17 Percent of Wisconsinites Favor Disbursing Retirement Benefits to Gov’t Workers Before Age 65 (5.29)
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|10.24.05 @ 5:50PM|#
Happy UN Day, Everyone!
|10.24.05 @ 5:57PM|#
"The Internet may have grown out of a government project, but it has never really been a creature of government. Why, then, is the debate over the Net's future being framed as a contest between whether one government or a group of them will get to breathe down the neck of ICANN or its successor organization? We have an opportunity now to put the root in the hands of an organization that is not international�in the sense of being "between nations," though still defined by them�but truly global, responsible to the citizens and stakeholders of the world rather than its governments."
What "opportunity" does Julian speak of? He conveniently skirts around the rather important detail of exactly how we simply declare that ICANN runs the net and is 100% free of government restrictions.
And, yes, it is "responsible to the shareholders and citizens of the world", but that is a far cry from actually being free from government restriction and coercion. Show me a corporation that is truly "free"? Julian mentions, almost under his breath, that ICANN is "defined" by whichever nation-state it resides in - but until it can form its own standing army, I'd say that it most assuredly is under the control of whichever government it resides under - no matter how big and powerful it is.
|10.24.05 @ 5:59PM|#
Minitel
Amazingly, wikipedia seems to run on a server that's in even worse shape than reason's...
|10.24.05 @ 6:13PM|#
Heh, from the Minitel article at Wikipedia:
The messageries roses and other pornographic sites were also criticized for their possible use by under-age children; however, the government chose not to enact coercive measures, claiming that regulating the online access of children is up to their parents, not the government; it also enacted a tax on pornographic online services.
So it turns out that France is Libertopia after all.
|10.24.05 @ 6:37PM|#
Yes ICANN, if Kofi says it's OK.
Think of the billions to be made by UN beaurecrats with a puny 1% tax for e-commerce transactions...Italian Villas for everyone!