Julian Sanchez | October 17, 2005
Doug Bandow wonders: Can't the country that invented Tae Kwon Do handle its own self defense?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
From the pictures I've seen, I'd say that Kim Jong Il needs to
master his own bodyweight.
Seriously, though, I have also long wondered why the richer, more
populous Korea needs help against the much poorer and less populous
Korea.
At this point, I'm guessing simply momentum. Sort of the same reason we have the trade embargo with Castro's Cuba long since it stopped having any effect. Well, any effect other than likely helping Castro say in power.
Bandow hits on it himself - South Korea is closer to China than
to the US on nuke talks with the North.
The American presence in South Korea is intended to strengthen our
hand in East Asia. It's not about South Korea's defense, it's about
projecting our power in the region. That becomes a lot harder
without land bases on the mainland - even our allies could tilt
away from us.
Also, without our strong military ties to South Korea, American
cartoons would be much costlier to produce.
Semi-related: as a junkie for CD releases from Sublime Frequencies
(who are dedicated to releasing recordings of pop and folk music
from some of the most remote corners of the world -- Burmese go-go
music? Who knew?), I recently picked up their new release of pop
music from North Korea. All I can say is, I never dreamed a style
of pop music could make Freddie Mercury's Barcelona rock-opera seem
tame and un-bombastic.
-Keith
why the richer, more populous Korea needs help against the
much poorer and less populous Korea.
In all seriousness, being bigger and stronger won't help you
that much if your smaller opponent is also batshit
insane.
I have also long wondered why the richer, more populous
Korea needs help against the much poorer and less populous
Korea.
It might have something to do with the thousands of pieces of heavy
artillery pointed at Seoul, also. You did know that Seoul was in
range of Nork artillery, right?
You did know that Seoul was in range of Nork artillery,
right?
Well, it wasn't me, but yes. The South Koreans are also rather
aware of it. The notion is that South Korea can afford to build up
the firepower to provide sufficient deterrence to keep said NORK
artillery from firing.
ROK public opinion increasingly views the U.S. as a greater
threat than the DPRK
I wonder if the peoples of the world who constantly express this
opinion ("the US is a bigger threat than ") actually believe this
or are just venting.
The notion is that South Korea can afford to build up the
firepower to provide sufficient deterrence to keep said NORK
artillery from firing.
Yeah, but guess whose side the 800-pound gorilla next door (whose
leaders are also batshit insane) is going to take?
oops that should have read:
"the US is a bigger threat than --insert rogue nation here--"
ROK public opinion increasingly views the U.S. as a greater
threat than the DPRK
And they also sometimes say KJI is just an eccentric leader of the
nation of their brothers who would never hurt them. But
whenever there's any noise about our threatening nation removing
its menacing military presence, the ROK falls over itself to remind
us how much it values the US presence....
Pull out, let them deal.
Ahh, they just want that country club in central Seoul (Yongsan) shut down. The military can stay, but, you know, in the southern part of the country... and right by the DMZ of course.
A friend of mine used to be stationed in the DMZ. They refer to
themselves as The Speedbump. The real deterrents aren't land based
and aren't physically in the way. A touring Pacific carrier group
would be just as effective, especially if there were also a boomer
parked somewhere that we periodically let Kim see.
I thought this administration was going to drastically cut that
force as part of modernization. What happened to that?
The notion is that South Korea can afford to build up the
firepower to provide sufficient deterrence to keep said NORK
artillery from firing.
This assumes that there is anything within range of the South
Korean military that Kim Jong Il gives a crap about.
North Korea is a Chinese client state, so an invasion/regime change
is right out, unless someone is willing to start a war with the
ChiComs also.
As I understand it, without using nukes, the South Koreans can't
take out the underground artillery parks without actually capturing
them, so the Norks keep firing.
As I understand it, without using nukes, the South Koreans
can't take out the underground artillery parks without actually
capturing them, so the Norks keep firing.
Can the U.S. do it without nukes? Lots of neat mountain breaking
stuff was demonstrated on TV in anticipation of the siege on Tora
Bora, but I never figured out if any of that stuff was in the
field.
If the South Koreans don't or can't buy our bunker killing weapons
let them build their own. Nukes even. They're smart folks.
I seriously doubt that the Chinese will allow Kim Jong Il to
start a war. Even if the US sat it out and did nothing, and even if
Kim Jong Il refrained from using nukes, they have nothing to gain
from a war on the Korean peninsula.
Besides, even if you doubt that scenario and believe that we should
remain in an alliance with South Korea and see to their defense,
why keep 30,000 ground forces in range of Kim's artillery? We have
air bases in Japan. Those 30,000 infantry could do us more good in
Iraq or Afghanistan.
This assumes that there is anything within range of the
South Korean military that Kim Jong Il gives a crap
about.
The idea is that they get that sort of stuff. And there are any
number of US corporations that would be more than happy to get the
contract.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245