Reason.com

Print|Email

Putting the Pon back in Pontification

James Poniewozik is in the house. In olden days, Poniewozik—not to be confused with fellow James James Surowiecki—had a high-flying media column at Salon, and more auspiciously, wrote many great columns for Suck. He convinced me he was a genius when at the height of the dotcom boom I mentioned in passing that "everybody's talking about the internet millionaires, but nobody mentions the internet thousandaires, who are the clear winners if you just consider ROI," and—almost as if I'd said "Will no-one rid rid me of this turbulent priest?"—Pon immediately went off and murdered the idea. A consummate self-starter, and a consistently sharp, contrarian, and funny writer. Back in Old '99, Poniewozik got hired to be the TV writer for Time; he now reaches a vastly larger audience, and had a big cover story this summer, but in the inevitable way of the power/influence tradeoff, his Time offerings haven't included the heavy helping of salt I prefer in a column.

Anyway, Poniewozik now has a blog. It's done under the auspices of Time, so we must limit our expecations in terms of spontaneity, immediacy, and cusswords (and apparently, links). But it's encouraging to see him back with a form that will allow regular bullshit detection and eyeball-poking. Presumably the more traffic he gets the more his evil corporate masters will let him get away with, so give him some traffic.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.

|9.15.05 @ 5:49PM|

No.

|9.15.05 @ 6:28PM|

Why did Suck go out of its way to publish their articles in such an unreadable format? Furthermore, when I saw the Suck-whoring I expected Nick to be behind this.

|9.15.05 @ 6:32PM|

Oh, and I checked out the blog. The first page is full of stuff I could not care less about, but I watch very little television, other than sports (I'm a Netflix addict).

Who Cares?|9.15.05 @ 7:17PM|

"...but I watch very little television, other than sports (I'm a Netflix addict)."

Well aren't you special!

|9.16.05 @ 12:43AM|

"I am an artist... I don't own a television set. That makes me better than you."

-- "Art Video," Eugene Mirman

http://www.eugenemirman.com

|9.16.05 @ 12:45AM|

Hey, the "Hebrew Hammer" guy is in a TV series now! Cool!

(Actually, I already knew this because I saw the promos a couple times. I do watch TV -- although, not as much as I'd like to.) :)

|9.16.05 @ 3:12AM|

Tough crowd.

Ron Hardin|9.16.05 @ 3:59AM|

I tried several sentences and an extra sentence just out of kindness and could not figure out what he was talking about.

It's great stuff for some other audience than me.

He seemed to be offended but I could not tell at what. Why is he watching the TV? It's for women.

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245