Matt Welch | September 15, 2005
A good speech, I thought, and I say that through clenched teeth. I certainly would have liked it a whole lot better if he would have said something like, "You know that Transporktation Bill, and everything like it? I'm going to time-travel back and veto (v-e-t-o, I think) that sumbitch, so that we spend tax money on stuff that actually matters, and maybe not spend so much tax money, period. Also, that whole biggest-new-bureaucracy-in-three-decades thing, maybe that wasn't such a good idea." Short of that, we're reduced to finding comfort in a president demonstrating that he cares, and that he actually claims to take responsibility for a mistake.
Here's that Executive Power-drunk moment:
It is now clear that a challenge on this scale requires greater federal authority and a broader role for the armed forces -- the institution of our government most capable of massive logistical operations on a moment's notice.
I also find it enduringly interesting that Kanye West really did seem to get under Dubya's skin. Anyhoo, what did y'all think?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
It was a decent speech for W. Heavy on rhetoric and light on
details (as usual), but I thought he did an admirable job of
connecting to the American people while avoiding any obvious
gaffes.
(Of course, I didn't actually watch the damned thing. I've
come to regard that as superfluous.)
"I have ordered the Department of Homeland Security to
undertake an immediate review, in cooperation with local
counterparts, of emergency plans in every major city in
America."
That is definitely one area that the Feds fell down on. They should
have been riding Louisiana for months or years about their
evacuation plans and making sure their communication systems had
backup power. The Feds complaints to Louisiana were all softballed
and done behind closed doors.
I think we need a highly public ratings system for localities. The
Feds can come in rate your locality and then it is your
responsibility to get it up to par. If you need Federal money (or
think you do) call your congressman.
Stan, that gets a nomination for best sentence of the day.
I'm gonna quote you mice elf. Might even plagerize it.
I agree with you Shannon. The problem is that I am not sure anyone would pay any attention to the ratings.
A good speech? Sounded like the same old power-mad clueless
bullshit to me. It's a good thing that sonofabitch had all of
Jackson Square cleared of any human life before he landed to
further debase New Orleans ... I imagine there are a few people in
those parts who don't take kindly to such propaganda stunts in a
city still filled with poison water and corpses.
Oh, and how exactly are the people without phones or electricity or
Internet service supposed to call his stupid toll-free number or
visit whatever web site they were pushing tonight?
I liked the part where he said:
"The United States doesn't own any cities. See, sometimes
individual citizens voluntarily gather on a specific geographic
site. They'll build things there, make up a name for the site,
stuff like that.
"Now, that's cool and everything. But the rest of us don't really
have anything to do with it. We're just individual citizens, too,
with our own lives. Some of us have gathered on other sites, where
we've built things and assigned them names, et cetera et cetera.
Some of us don't gather with other individuals at all, just doing
our thang on our own little sites.
"So what I'm trying to say is that I am not going to force
individuals to support other individuals. Don't get me wrong --
it's really neat that many individuals have chosen to assist the
individuals who'd been gathered on the site known by the name 'New
Orleans.' I think it's -- what? -- like, $700 million that they've
voluntarily dished up? That really is awesome.
"But good God, I can't just take money from my fellow citizens to
arbitrarily give to some other citizens. Are you kidding? I mean,
I'm merely a citizen myself. I'm not a thief -- I can't just go
around stealing people's money. I realize we've come to think of
the United States as a single entity, but it's actually just a
bunch of individuals.
"Y'all see what I'm getting at, right? Please, give to your heart's
content. I encourage you to donate whatever you can. But I'm not
going to steal money from you to rebuild stuff on this one
arbitrary site where some individuals just happened to voluntarily
gather.
"And let me tell you, even if it were proper for me to steal money
to rebuild arbitrary sites, I sure wouldn't mess with this one. The
place is a valley right next to a sea! Dig that
loony idea -- spending your money to reconstruct a place that is
essentially guaranteed to be wiped out again! I mean, what the
hell?!"
That part was awesome.
It is now clear that a challenge on this scale requires
greater federal authority and a broader role for the armed forces
-- the institution of our government most capable of massive
logistical operations on a moment's notice.
Sorry, that should have read:
It is now clear that a challenge on this scale requires greater
personal authority and a broader role for Wal-Mart -- the
institution of our industry most capable of massive logistical
operations on a moment's notice.
Dubya stole so many plays out of the Libertarian Handbook and then fucked it all up with that military shit --- besides that: He sounded like a desciple of Mrs. Rand
In 50 billion years the sun will burn out, the earth will become a giant ball of ice, and none of this will matter.
I'm going to time-travel back and veto (v-e-t-o, I think)
that sumbitch... Short of that,we're reduced to finding comfort in
a president demonstrating that he cares
What the hell do you expect? This is a democracy. Or so
they seem to be saying in all the public schools now days.
This, friends and neighbors, is the ultimate problem with
democracy. You say and do whatever gets you more votes, and all
else be damned.
How many waves of suicidal congressmen do you suppose it would take
to turn things back towards a rational direction? I think many
one-termers, in the House. The MSM would merrily see them
crucified, for it would sell.
We have far better ideas about how to make the world work
economically than we do politically.
Ted -
The Wall Street Journal has done a great job documenting
the priceless contributions private enterprise -- Wal-Mart, Home
Depot, and others -- made (more below). But the DOD has the heavy
lift capability -- land, sea, and air -- for immediate rescue
operations and to clear the way for everyone else. They also have
lots of guns just in case.
Here?s an excerpt from one WSJ report:
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, through its non-profit Center for
Corporate Citizenship, became a clearinghouse, fielding calls from
many of its 3,000 state and local organizations and compiling lists
of needed supplies.
By the weekend the Chamber's CCC was turbo-charging a new computer
program, designed by tech firm i2, which served as a kind of bridal
registry for needed relief supplies. Each donor company indicated
what order it would fill, avoiding duplication or delay. IBM got to
work on a computerized job bank to help place those who'd lost
work. The American Trucking Association set up a Web site to update
everyone on road conditions.
Companies then focused on doing what each did best. In some cases
it was simply ramping up operations, as with Black & Decker,
whose employees worked Labor Day weekend to churn out extra
generators. In other cases, it was firms using their modern
logistical skills to get into hard hit areas. FedEx and other
delivery companies used computer systems with designed-in
flexibility to reroute vehicles and adjust flights to get in aid.
FedEx has already moved more than 100 tons of relief
supplies.
Wal-Mart mined its vast databases of past purchases to compile
lists of goods most desired after a hurricane. (Among the top
items? Strawberry pop tarts.) Because of its advance logistics
planning, the big retail chain was able to quickly move in to
devastated areas with mini Wal-Marts to hand out goods. Other firms
leveraged similar supply-chain capabilities; Pfizer dispensed
pharmaceuticals via Wal-Mart and other retailers. "What companies
do is solve problems," says Johanna Schneider, an executive
director at the Business Roundtable.
Wow, 5 billion years?
Thanks, I was worried for a bit. I thought it was only 5
million years.
I think that the feds should help secure the port of New Orleans
and its petroleum and gas industry because they are essential to
the country's economy. As for the rest of the city, I wouldn't
rebuild it. It would make more sense to built a city on stilts in
Lake Ponchartrain than to rebuild in a sump. If people want to live
there, they should pay for it themselves, but the attitude that was
displayed by the city and state governments in this catastrophe was
irresponsible.
Why reward it?
I've been a big supporter of George Bush, but I really don't like
the idea of going further into debt just to rebuild a place that
shouldn't have been inhabited in the first place. Netherlands lives
below sea level, but it doesn't get Category 5 hurricanes, and when
it got flooded in the 1950s it didn't ask the rest of Europe fo
foot the bill. It built a sea wall to prevent such disasters in
future.
To the extent rebuilding makes sense, the city's port and
industries can pay for it themselves. For the rest, they could
rebuild the whole French Quarter in Las Vegas and never have to
worry about levees or hurricanes again. It's not good planning or
good economics to build in a place where you have to pump your
sewage uphill, especially when the whole vicinity is continuing to
sink. The rest of the nation has shown its willingness to help the
stranded and to help the displaced reestablish themselves, but to
ask it to put the city back the way it was is an insult.
Correction. In principle we know what to do about government
(limit it) just as we know what to do about economics (basically
stay out of it).
The problem I'm getting at is, how do we implement a system that
doesn't spontaneously self destruct with age?
The Common Wino says don't sweat it, the sun is burning out
anyway.
I also find it enduringly interesting that Kanye West really
did seem to get under Dubya's skin.
This is how those rapper feuds get started. I heard that when Dubya
releases his next CD around Christmas, he will devote the first
track to a severe smackdown of West.
I caught the last half or so of it on the radio on my way home.
W seems to be at his public-speaking best when speaking after some
horrendous disaster.
Bush has always struck me as being honestly sincere in what he
says, even if it is devoid of the awwwwshucks charisma of
Clinton.
I have to disagree with Zero Boss about the speech being light on
details. He touched on a number of plans and programs that would be
instituted as a result of the Katrina disaster. Of course, he
didn't go into details* but such speeches aren't meant to get
bogged down in the nitty-gritty of making sure you have Form 3452-A
filled out in triplicate with blue ink only.
-{shrugs shoulders}-
Ultimately it was more of the same. Soothing tones from the leader
of the free world, wrapped in a promise to take care of the
problems.
In the end, I couldn't help but suppress a bit of a snicker. A US
President making a speech from a lawless city run by heavily armed
criminals and gangs, and I was just hoping somewhere off-camera
Snake Pliskin was walking away in disgust while hurridly pulling
apart a cassette tape.
*After all, did you really think you weren't footing the bill for
it?
I don't care 'bout black people? You the one spreadin'
hate
Bitch, I made a sistah my Sec'atary o' State!
YOU made a video callin' sistahs "gold diggas"
YOU made a video that used the word "n-----s"
Hatin', it just ain't a part of my strategery
But you leave me no choice but to hurt your feelin's, G
Just got a blow job from Katrina, doin' the best I can
So y'all can go to hell, West, young man!
(folds arms, looks defiant)
Shannon Love,
You've got it backwards. The people of Louisiana and New Orleans
have been screaming for years for help from the Feds to improve the
levees and have been denied again and again. Just last year the
Corps of Engineers requested 100 million for improvements and only
recieved 42. They'd rather spend 250 million for Alaskan "Highways
to Nowhere".
The result of this disaster is that New Orleans' streets are
going to be paved in hundred dollar bills courtesy of the federal
government.
Most of the poor probably won't go back to live in a below sea
level toxic waste pit. The middle class certainly won't go back.
Therefore, all this money is going to go to the politicians and the
elites of New Orleans and Louisiana. They'll have their money,
their tourist traps, and be rid of all the blacks.
Who needs emergency prevention and mitigation when disaster pays so
well?
Barbara Bush: Relocatin' be woikin' so well fo' the
homeys...
George W: Woid to yuh muthah...
I've been screaming for years for help from the Feds to buy me a
new heating system and have been denied again and again. If I
freeze to death, I'm blaming the small government philosophy that
has formed in this country during the last 25 years.
At least I've got a $128 million arena in my backyard to keep me
happy. I even have a basketball team that I pay millions of dollars
a year to play in the empty arena. And you should see my football
team! They only cost $186 million to rent for ten years!
"The people of Louisiana and New Orleans have been screaming for
years for help from the Feds to improve the levees and have been
denied again and again."
Same problem, just "before" rather than "after."
There's some question as to whether the feds should be the ones to
fix NO's problems after the flooding. The same questions apply to
the idea of the feds fixing NO's problems before the flooding. Why
can't Louisiana build its own damn levees? It failed to do so. This
is NOT the fault of the federal government.
Fostering this entitlement mentality among state and city pols -
that's another matter.
" I also find it enduringly interesting that Kanye West really
did seem to get under Dubya's skin. "
Oh yeah, I'm sure Dubya bases his policy decisions on taunts from
rappers. Snicker guffaw chortle.
Matt, when in a hole the idea isn't to keep digging. Reality really
isn't as painful as it seems.
Wow, 5 billion years? Thanks, I was worried for a bit. I
thought it was only 5 million years.
That's because you're using that free Intelligent Design wristwatch
you got at church. I've heard they're having problems getting the
decimals straight in those things.
Am I the only one who seemed to think that W snuck in his
support for scrapping the "Posse Comitatus" principle after he read
off the Santa List for all the Welfare State goodie grubbers, rich
and poor? Something about the military being the best part of the
federal government to deal with disasters like Katrina?
It never ceases to amaze me how so many people on the right have
this Tom Clancy phantasm of the U.S. military being a lean, mean,
efficiency machine, just like lefties think the military is some
great "in loco parentis" socializing force that can make "Boys To
Men" through "national service".
There must be written on every white board on K-street:
$200 Billion + Karl Rove as Director of Operations for the
rebuilding = Profit!
Good thing they're cutting the wages of poor schlubs who will be
doing the work. Wouldn't want to minimize profits on this
gig.
*sigh*
Conservatives Balk As Spending Soars, which is kind of a misleading title from the Wall Street Journal when you have Newt Gingrich proposing a government sponsored enterprise (GSE) to rebuild the Gulf Coast:
Gingrich proposes a Gulf States Redevelopment Corp., backed by the federal government but controlled and regulated by officials in the region, to issue bonds, make loans and grants, provide natural-disaster insurance, raise taxes and finance public works, including levee reconstruction.
"If we do not have a bold set of solutions to propose in the next week or two, the left will propose a huge government run bureaucratic rebuilding program with maximum welfare and minimum progress," Mr. Gingrich wrote in an email to conservative Republican senators.
Yet no less and eminence than Alan Greenspan just panned the GSE model, citing the undue (moral hazard) risks they take, underwritten by implicit government guarantees. The 'too big to fail' systemic risks they impose, while not technically speaking "huge government run bureaucratic" programmes, should still be abhorred by libertarians and small-government conservatives, who would loth seeing the creation of yet another pernicious special-interest lobbying group that would inevitably arise to keep alive a 'GSRC'well beyond what is was made for -- zombies, they're an invasive species, hard to kill.
Although you could also argue that the Federal Reserve itself is a GSE than can print its own money -- no less -- and that Greenspan is a hypocrite (or Randian turncoat, if you will).
New Orleans is going to become a huge battleground in the eminent domian wars. Maxine Waters isn't going to allow wetland buffers to be made out of black neighborhoods, even if the public benefit is obvious. Expect congressional movement on an amendment to restrict ED in the very near future.
Oh yeah, I'm sure Dubya bases his policy decisions on taunts
from rappers. Snicker guffaw chortle.
JB, did you read the Larry King Transcript, G.H.W. Bush mentions it
specfically.
JB, did you read the Larry King Transcript, G.H.W. Bush
mentions it specfically.
Okay, we'll get Jay-Z to do the Eazy E thing and give $10,000 to
the president, and then wait for Kanye's mix of "No Vaseline"
....
It's so pathetic to hear Poppy Bush come out crying about how
the media is not treating his son fairly. Cry me a river
George.
Aren't you the guy who slandered a competitor with Willie Horton
and the pledge of allegiance?
If you ever doubt how powerful advertising is, just consider that people remember the name "Willie Horton" more easily than they do "Michael Dukakis."
Thanks, I was worried for a bit. I thought it was only 5
million years.
Nice Carl Sagan reference, there.
What a disaster! Spend Spend Spend, Control Control Control, "a broader role for the armed forces". Inside our borders??! Bush is no conservative-Not even close. He's a big spending liberal with fascistic leanings.
I'm going to be bitter and cynical here. Disasters that
disproportionately affect the poor are the left's version of the
terrorist attack on an American city. Just as the environment after
9/11 made it difficult for civil libertarians who were all too
easily dismissed as anti American, we will now be facing charges of
being racist and hating poor people for the next two years because
we don't believe the welfare reform act had anything to do with
Katrina's impact.
Every Democrat was a hawk through the end of 2002 and every
Republican will be a welfare pimp through the end of 2006 at a
minimum. There will be no rational discussion about this at all. We
will throw bazillions into reconstruction that makes no sense. We
will subsidize more and nicer housing below the flood plain. We
will give HUD a ton of money for no good reason. I heard Barney
Frank talk about repealing the Welfare Reform Act. The next
election will be the nastiest since, well, the last one.
Question: What sort of disaster would help libertarians in this
way?
When you run the numbers, that $200 billion is enough to cut a
check for over $180,000 to every man, woman, and child counted in
the 1.1 million evacuees.
I say just cut them a check for half that, end the operation, and
be done with it.
Because you just KNOW that, after paying the payroll of through the
dozens of levels of red-tape bureaucrats, the evacuees won't get a
TENTH that amount.
Also, contra Rick Barton's general gist, there is no conservative willing to get the boot because he votes against black people stranded on their roofs. Statism feeds on this kind of crisis, and all we can hope for is that attempts to make an FDR style revolution out of it will be hamstrung by political incompetence and opposing interests.
The only good part was the urban homesteading act proposal. But bush might put some big government control spin into it. Like his education programs-more control from DC.
Jason,
The political considerations not withstanding, I don't consider
that contra my sentiments. I agree that statism feeds on this kind
of crisis.
If you ever doubt how powerful advertising is, just consider
that people remember the name "Willie Horton" more easily than they
do "Michael Dukakis."
Maybe people just remember interesting people more than
non-interesting ones.
Bush missed his opportunity to make New Orleans the first 21st
century city: Put a dome on it!
Come on, this is the future, we need to have big honkin'
transparent-domed cities.
Now, granted, eventually, the whole damn dome will sink into the
muck, taking the city with it, but still, it'd be awesome.
"The only good part was the urban homesteading act proposal. But
bush might put some big government control spin into it. Like his
education programs-more control from DC."
Or, worse, maybe it'll be done through religious organizations,
who'll make sure only the right kind of people can participate.
What sort of disaster would help libertarians in this
way?
We've had a whole series of disasters. None of them helped.
What sort of disaster would help libertarians in this
way?
If enough people at all levels of power were simultaneously caught
with their hands in enough cookie jars then that would prompt big
changes.
But dramatic things like that don't happen in real life.
John has the best idea, although I'd just round it up to an even
100k for each person, and be done with it. Think of what a great,
short, speech that would make; it'd make the Gettysburg Address
seem drawn-out...
"A huge storm rolled in two weeks ago, and a lot of stuff was
wrecked. Everybody in the region will get a hundred grand. Good
night!
...you could even work with it a little and turn it into haiku!
Just think what the Geroge W. Bush Memorial on The Mall would look
like!
--"A US President making a speech from a lawless city run by
heavily armed criminals and gangs"
You mean, just like all the ones he makes in DC?
Wow, this thread is hot!
"A huge storm rolled in two weeks ago, and a lot of stuff was
wrecked. Everybody in the region will get a hundred grand. Good
night!
...you could even work with it a little and turn it into
haiku!
A bad storm blew in
New Orleans was wrecked, but good
Hundred grand for all
Actually, it turns out that France did not disclose the inherent
defect in New Orleans when it sold the Louisiana Territory to the
United States. As a result, we plan to use our legal might to wring
justice--and $200 billion--from the French.
The good news is that if we win and are able to force
France to pay our attorneys' fees, well, there's no way the French
will be able to pay. Then we can convert France into one big theme
park: Franceland or, perhaps, Gaulliworld.
If you ever doubt how powerful advertising is, just consider
that people remember the name "Willie Horton" more easily than they
do "Michael Dukakis."
Dukakis was a pretty bland politician, whereas who can ever forget
da boogie man. I don't know how much that has to do with
advertising.
In related news, China--inspired by Kuwait's $500 million in-kind donation of oil to the U.S.--has pledged a $1 billion donation of beads to the Big Easy. In a message thanking the Chinese for their generious donation, Reason commenter Gaius Marius reportedly said, Monstra mihi tuum mammis.
"Aren't you the guy who slandered a competitor with Willie
Horton and the pledge of allegiance?"
Willie Horton originated with Al Gore in the primaries....look it
up.
Just to stick up for Babs Bush a little bit...the way she said
it was typically rich-white-clueless-grandma-clumsy, but her point
is basically true. If you're poor and black, Houston is better than
New Orleans. Better housing, better transit, better chance at
finding a job, better public schools (sad but true), less violent
crime, less naked, institutionalized racism...better all the way
around. New Orleans was not a nice place to be poor, and especially
not a nice place to be poor and black.
And yes, I have actually talked to some of the Super
Dome/Convention Center evacuees about this.
It is now clear that a challenge on this scale requires
greater federal authority and a broader role for the armed forces
-- the institution of our government most capable of massive
logistical operations on a moment's notice.
Actually, I agree. <shock>
Pro Libertade -
I fomehow doubt that thif home infpection will ftand up in
court.
JAG,
"Willie Horton originated with Al Gore in the primaries....look it
up."
And when you look it up, you will discover that Al Gore never
mentioned Willie Horton's name or showed picture, or that of any
other criminal, when criticizing The Duke's prison furlough
program. Not. A. Single. Time.
That is the difference between discussing an issue, and exploiting
to frighten people with pictures of a scary black man.
Alaf, joe :)
Of course, it all depends just what court we bring suit in, doesn't
it? A creative lawyer might point out, too, that we actually
already own France. See World Wars I and II; also see
Johnson v. McIntosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543, 5 L. Ed. 681
(1823). I think you'll like this case, joe, where John Marshall
expounds on the right of conquest:
Obviously, since we conquered France (then held in fee simple by
Germany) during the Second World War, U.S. legal precedent clearly
indicates that we own it. Ain't law fun? If I get appointed to the
Supreme Court, perhaps I will say that the official language of the
U.S. is Swedish.
When Matt posted "Lay down your farms" over how he was inspired
by a Bush speech, I instead wondered where the palmed card was, now
we know.
Bush's answer to sending in the fireman several days late? Armed
Super-Fireman of the New Homeland Republic.
See how neatly he palmed that card.
When is Reason going to fire Welch? This is ridiculous. Yes, the Transportation Bill should be veto? But why does Welch think dumping $200 billion into the Gulf region to "rebuild" it is the proper function of government?
123,
wtf are you talking about?
"yes, the transportation bill should be veto?"
pick one or the other: crack smoking on friday night, or commenting
on the web.
What about me? 4 time all-star, key contributor to the Tiger's '68 Series win, on the Wall of Fame at Comerica Park. This really sucks!
joe,
Apparently you believe the fiction that, after using the example of
Willie Horton in a debate, no newspaper was going to look it up and
give the details.
Dukakis pardon tons of people, no doubt a number of white guys went
on to do similarly egregious crimes. Why didn't Gore find one like
that? You really believe that Gore's people didn't know EXACTLY
what they were doing?
How naive are you?
Were the Bush people being just as cynical as Gore? I don't doubt
it. But Gore did whatever "dirty" work was needed, FIRST.
He opened a racist door and only someone hopelessly blind can't see
where Gore HOPED it would lead.
I guess some of us grasp the obvious difference between discussing a criminal justice policy in a debate, and having an ad full of pictures of dark skinned "criminal types" running in front of people's eyes, and some of us don't.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245