Ronald Bailey argues that if FEMA isn't going to be very good at helping people get out of the way of a hurricane, it might at least try not to put them there in the first place.
Reason Magazine
Most Popular Stories
- Fox Business Network Cancels Judge Andrew Napolitano's Freedom Watch (2.9)
- Breitbart on libertarians in 2012 (2.11)
- Did the Drug War Make it Any Easier for Whitney Houston to Seek Help For Substance Abuse? (2.12)
- The Inside and Outside of CPAC 2012 (2.10)
- One Possible Reason There Are So Few Liberals, Starring Jonathan Chait. And Some Stuff About Tax Progressivity. (2.10)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Romney Most Electable Candidate, Yet Gingrich in Statistical Tie Among GOP Voters (1.31)
- Explaining Newt’s Second Surge (1.26)
- George Washington Would Beat Out Romney as Richest President; John Kerry Would Have, Too (1.25)
- New Poll: Americans Aren't Ready for Another War (1.20)
- 2012 Election Match Up: Romney Wins, Paul Might (1.13)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
|9.14.05 @ 12:33PM|#
http://wuzzadem.typepad.com/wuz/2005/09/another_katrina_1.html
It wasn't the federal government that blocked the Red Cross - it was the Louisiana Department of Homeland Security. However, the feds have been getting the blame.
Dave W.|9.14.05 @ 1:08PM|#
Not clear what Mr. Bailey means when he says that the "Feds took over in 1917" on the levees. Wouldn't this have prevented the locals from doing levee maintenance, as the article suggests, even if they wanted to? I mean, the fed Gov't does have something of a propensity for fences and barb wire.
On the other hand, couldn't the Feds had *unilaterally* removed itself from control of the levees if it wanted to?
If the Fed gov't wants to not be looked to for competence, then they need to stop "taking things over."
Also: Why isn't Mr. Bailey suggesting that the Fed gov't relinquish control of levees now? His point about insurance is well-taken, but if the locals are ever to become responsible for levees, then it seems like NOW is the time.
So Mr. Bailey, should Bush and Congress give up levee control now? I am open to this approach, but not clear what you think about this.
Larry A|9.14.05 @ 2:38PM|#
So Mr. Bailey, should Bush and Congress give up levee control now? I am open to this approach, but not clear what you think about this.
I would say that "It's time for local citizens take more responsibility for constructing and maintaining the infrastructure that protects them and their property." pretty well spells that out.
|9.14.05 @ 2:43PM|#
I'm not absolutely positive about this but I believe the levees on the Mississippi River are under Federal Control and the levees elsewhere are under the New Orleans Levee Board. Could be wrong.
Dave W.|9.14.05 @ 3:36PM|#
"It's time for local citizens take more responsibility for constructing and maintaining the infrastructure that protects them and their property." pretty well spells that out.
Wrong. it is not clear whether or not he means: "It's time for federal gov't to cede control of the levees so that, subsequent to that, local citizens can take more responsibility for [blah, blah, blah]." If that is what he means, then that is what he should of said. If he dosn't mean this, then it is difficult to see how Bailey's plan would work.
|9.14.05 @ 4:09PM|#
Dave W: The Feds should cede control to local citizens who can decide to tax themselves for their upkeep; privatize their maintenance to insurance companies; or just give up and leave the flood plains. Now I hope that's clear.