Tim Cavanaugh | July 19, 2005
An Iraqi cutup, an expensive war, and a bucketful of bombs, in Reason Express.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Shia in the south, Sunni in the middle, and Kurdish in the
north. Would this be such a bad outcome?
The democratic thing to do is to put this question to vote in Iraq.
Democracy!
Another big strike against the current approach in Iraq is
its great cost. Sooner or later the U.S. will be forced to consider
spending less money on the war effort. Spending somewhere between
$5 and $8 billion a month is simply not sustainable year after
year.
We can spend $500 billion on "highway" pork barrel projects but
can't swing national defense? Yeah, right.
Those highway appropriations are for projects that will last several years and which are at least hypothetically investments that will generate greater tax revenue in the future. (Which is not to say I support them, but there is a distinction between splurging for a $10,000 kitchen remodelling job, which may not be necessary, but will add some value to the house, and spending the same $10,000 on a trip to Vegas,)
"We can spend $500 billion on "highway" pork barrel projects but
can't swing national defense? Yeah, right"
Wait - I thought we were talking about Iraq? What do highways or
national defense have to do with that?
Oh, wait - our expenditures in Iraq are for nation-building, and
therefore the money is going to build highways over there? I still
don't get how your comparison is relevant...
Weren't US national highways originally built primarily for
Homeland Security reasons?
Guess there were a lot of Adams back in them Eisenhower days. When
dealing with these Adamses, the only way to get at their wallet is
to give'em a flag to wave first.
SR,
I think the Bush Admin's idea is just that -- a few hundred billion
(or more) spent in Iraq will pay huge dividends later on; an
investment in democracy that will have positive benefits throughout
the Middle East in the long run.
And it's not like the 5 to 8 billion per month just disappears; it
does create some jobs and in turn generates some tax revenue.
(I mention these things knowing the risk I might sound like a
Republican -- ugh.)
Hey, did anyone scroll down to the quote of the week? It seems
the wolf population of Europe is making a comeback.
Wolves Threaten Europe
Wolves disappeared from eastern Germany about 1850. Suddenly
they are back. The animals moved into the overgrown hectares of
artillery ranges and military exercise grounds abandoned by the
Soviet forces in Saxony.
The wolves feed off deer and are flourishing; two packs have
already formed and biologists say a third is taking
shape.
The human population of eastern Germany, by contrast, is
dwindling.
Almost 1 million have left for western Germany since
unification. Villages are dying out. One community, Horno, has been
reduced to two people.
Frank Morschel, of the German branch of the World Wide Fund for
Nature, said: "In the long run, we can count on wolves repopulating
much of eastern Germany - as long as humans let it
happen."
Wolves are on the move throughout Europe and the reason is
always the same; they sense a change in human behaviour.
I, for one, welcome our resurgent lupine overlords.
a few hundred billion (or more) spent in Iraq will pay huge
dividends later on; an investment in democracy that will have
positive benefits throughout the Middle East in the long
run.
Egad! Enronopotamia! Better scrutinize the books on this one,
boys!
Should Iraq now be called Nasdaq?
Another opportunity to propose my ingenious plan to establish a
lasting peace in the Middle East for a bargain price!
Give a powerful automatic weapon with plenty of ammunition to any
woman who is required to wear a veil by law, local custom, or
family pressure.
I used to make that suggestion as a really bad joke--and not an
entirely original one, either. Sometimes, though, I just
wonder....
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245