Tim Cavanaugh | June 21, 2005
Who gives a fo'c'sle about the solar sail? What downhomey megaretailer has been seen squiring the brightest luminaries of la haute société? Who watches the credit card watchmen? Only Reason Express readers know for sure.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I'm really excited to see Cosmos 1. Although it's unlikely that a sailship will ever be suited for deep space exploration, if successful it could certainly bring down the cost of trips to the moon...please.
"Although it's unlikely that a sailship will ever be suited for
deep space exploration, if successful it could certainly bring down
the cost of trips to the moon."
I disagree. Solar sails are one of only two theoretical propulsion
methods (that I know of) that don't carry their own fuel, and are
therefore suitable for deep-space travel (the other being the
Bussard
ramjet).
The hardest part about getting to the moon is just getting out of
Earth's gravity well, and the best solution to that is the space elevator.
That will not only get you off the ground, but centrifugal force
can throw you into a higher orbit suitable for reaching the moon
and perhaps some nearby planets. For that matter, once you get on
Luna, you get cheap solar energy to power a linear accelerator and
launch you to pretty much anywhere you want to go in the Solar
system.
Perhaps if consumers demanded that any and all records they
generate be encrypted from their creation until the records
date-certain destruction, the entire financial system would be much
more secure.
Except that the major data losses of the last few months have
happened within companies that, presumably, would be doing the
encryption and decryption.
The only way to secure the data is to make sure credit card
companies, banks, and processors are all financially liable for
fraud only they can protect against.
The problem with sailships is not going out, it's coming back
in. Plus, the farther out you go the more your acceleration
decreases. While there are theories about building lasers and
whatnot, I don't view them as very practical.
I'm all for the space elevator, but I haven't heard any updates for
nearly two years now, not that I've been keeping too a close watch
on it.
While probably not a solution for deep space exploration,
couldn't solar sails be used by ships just tooling around the upper
atmosphere?
A lot like tugboats and dingys at a harbor?
I don't see the one-way nature of solar sails as a problem.
They'd be great for sending a probe to a nearby star.
The problem is that once the probe gets there, the star will push
the sails away.
So it comes down to a question of how much braking the star will
exert, what kind of orbit it will get into, etc. We could send a
probe with fuel on-board to navigate around the stellar system, but
we have to have confidence in the parts working once it gets there.
That's a long voyage and there's a lot of dust between here and
there.
From what I've read, these aren't things that work in an
atmosphere.
I can see using them to go outward, but how can you move towards
the sun? Doesn't the solar wind blow out in a sphere?
I know sailing ships can tack against the wind, but they need to be
a few point off the direction of the wind.
Actually, looking at the picture in USA Today shows it's in
triangular parts, so some could be deployed perpendicular to the
solar wind while others are parallel, so you could steer and I
guess tack towards the sun.
Cool!
Actually, you can use sails to navigate closer to a central
star, if you are in an orbit.
Essentially, you direct your sail to deflect the radiation ahead of
you in your orbit.
This will slow you down (it will also tend to lift you into a
higher orbit but the loss of velocity should dominate). Once your
speed is sufficiently below that required to maintain a circular
orbit (the push outward must also be counteracted), your ship's
distance from the central star will begin to fall.
It should also be quite possible to change the plane of your
orbit.
This is not tacking. Tacking depends on water resistance minimizing
the sideways motion of a sailboat. In space the gas density is low
enough that, for all intents and purposes, there is no such medium.
So no tacking.
However, the momentum imparted from solar sails is very small, so
travel times will be significant. The primary benefits will be
realized when attempting to travel large distances within the Solar
System, wherein the sails have time to impart large
velocities.
I think once people build launchers out of linear accelerators on
airless bodies throughout the solar system, this technology will go
away. A network of linear accelerators is far more economical.
While probably not a solution for deep space exploration,
couldn't solar sails be used by ships just tooling around the upper
atmosphere?
A lot like tugboats and dingys at a harbor?
Comment by: mediageek at June 21, 2005 05:29 PM
These are for use above the atmosphere. Another thing you can do is
use the solar wind to suspend a satellite in one position with
respect to the Earth and Sun without using fuel.
Solar sailing is OK for your interplanetary yacht, or sending a
deep space probe out that you don't need returned, but if you
really want to move mass from orbit into space, an Orion
drive or one of its variants is the way to go, at least until
we can build some Bussard
ramjets.
Some of these exotic beasties rely on lasers, so we might have some
work for Doc Thoreau. He could rename himself Doctor
Future, and really be the the archenemy of
yesteryear!
Kevin
Really, the only way to truly travel throughout space is to go back in time an kill Einstein before he comes up with that pesky speed of light.
Thanks tarran for clearing up one of the most comon
misconceptions about space travel. Ships thrust to increase or
decrease their orbital velocity. rarely will they actually thrust
toward or away from the sun.
Another misunderstanding when it comes to solar sails is the use of
the term "solar wind." Comonly this refers to the physical wind of
ionized particles flowing away from the sun. But a solar sail does
not use any kind of physical wind. Rather the "solar winnd" refered
to in connection with solar sails is light itself. Radiation
imparts a presure do to its change in momentum when reflected off a
serfice (even though light is massles it still posesses momentum in
acordance with general relativity) and this light pressure is what
a solar sail uses to accelerate.
However, there is a proposed method to use the atual "solar wind" for space travel: the magsail.
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/ap_solarsail_fail_050622.html
Seems like the solar sail didn't get into orbit, maybe the russians
replaced the denatured alcohol as was mentioned in another
thread?
The advantages of a solar sail are that sunlight is free and
always On. The disadvantages are that the solar sail must remain
highly reflective during its lifetime to work properly (which for
now is unlikely) and any solar wind or interstellar dust could
render it useless. Beyond Pluto is the Kuiper belt, and it is
unlikely a solar sail could transverse this region of dust and
planetoids unscathed. In any event, at some point the acceleration
due to the Sun photons won't be able to overcome the ram pressure
of interstellar gas and dust.
A Moon-based linear accelerator (read Heinlein's "The Moon is a
Harsh Mistress") is a very efficient way to launch payloads into
interplanetary space, maybe deep space, too. It could also launch
globs of fuel for in-flight refueling, even filling the space lanes
with local fuel dumps.
For that matter, an Earth-based linear accelerator could be of
substantial benefit.
Too bad the Cosmos 1 launch failed; it would have been an
interesting test of the technology.
I am intrigued by Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2).
It creates a big magnetic field around the spacecraft, and then the
craft is blown around by the solar wind (here meaning the outflux
of charged particles from the sun, not the photon pressure of
sunlight). Unlike the solar sail or the magsail, it doesn't require
a large, fragile, and heavy (it all adds up) physical
structure.
Info
here
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245