Nick Gillespie | June 3, 2005
Well, new and surprising to me anyway.
Back on May 19, I wrote a piece about the negative reaction among high-end critics to the final Star Wars flick, Revenge of the Sith. In the piece, I quoted Dale Peck in the NY Observer asking a semi-sneering series of questions, including this one:
What is it that led a handful of diehards to pitch a tent outside the Ziegfeld [theater in New York] weeks before the movie opened, so that they could buy the first tickets when they went on sale?
I now know the answer, thanks to an email from one Vince Hardy, who read my piece in a bowdlerized version on the Hawaii Reporter Web site. The line outside the Ziegfeld was part of a charity fundraiser put on by a Star Wars fan community called NYLine, which raised $46,000 for the Starlight Starbright Children's Foundation.
Here's a video link about the effort.
Reason has long been interested in how fan communities operate (go here and here for examples). This adds one new dimension to my understanding of that process.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
In my twenty-plus years of attending science fiction
conventions, I have never seen a con where there wasn't notable
charity activity. Bake sales, auctions, autograph-for-donation
tables, and assorted functions are a regular part of cons.
There's a whole segment in the movie Trekkies about fan charity
work and the money raised.
I wish we had a regular poster who could tell us whether a device could actually be created that used light to create a fencing weapon.
I wish we had a regular poster who could tell us whether a
device could actually be created that used light to create a
fencing weapon.
No. It can't.
I suppose one could create some sort of hand-hekd particle beam,
but we all know from the work of Spengler and Venkman what happens
when two such devices cross their streams, don't we? It ain't
pretty.
Kevin
Following up on Jeff's comment, I'm involved with the DC-Area SW Collector's Club, which frequently does charity-related work; last year, sale of a club-designed Yoda pin raised several thousand dollars for Children's Hospital in Baltimore. Every SW fan group I know does this stuff all the time.
They raffled off a really cool "Jedi Liberty" sculpture. Check
it out at it's creator's website:
http://www.nathanbrickartist.com/liberty_jedi.html
The life-sized Han Solo in Carbonite is pretty cool too.
If you want a lesson in fan communities, check out Lugnet. I've
never seen a more technically advanced or polite group of fans,
though the occasional European wonders why they pay so much more
for Lego sets made in Europe compared to US citizens (hint:
TAXES).
joe-
Light beams themselves would be useless as fencing weapons. Light
beams can pass right through each other without deflection.
(OK, a particle physicist might observe that gamma rays with enough
energy to create electron-positron pairs can scatter off each
other, but that doesn't involve visible light.)
Also, light beams can't terminate in mid-air without encountering
an object that absorbs light, a point that I hammer home to my
optics students when they do ray tracing.
Now, one might create an object that glows and deflects light, so
maybe those light sabers are actually retractable weapons that
glow. But they aren't pure light, that's for sure.
Geez, thoreau, way to spoil the story:)
Ya coulda made sumthin' up. We'da believed ya, you bein' a PhD an'
all:)
Personally, I had this hypothesis that the "light sabers" were
actually a jet of plasma (the superhot "4th state of matter")
contained in a long, narrow magnetic field. Or something like
that.
The magnetic fields wouldn't keep the plasma jets from sweeping
through objects (unless they were very dense) and cutting through
them. But if the magnetic fields of two sabers were brought near
each other, they'd resist contact like two magnets of like
polarity. Which would enable two sabers to parry each other, and
maybe make that "K-k-k-k-k" sound and shoot sparks when held
against each other, as can be observed in the films.
Thoreau, does that sound halway plausible? I'm sure there are
problems, like maybe creating a containment field intense enough to
produce the effect of a sharply bounded "blade," with a power
source compact enough to fit in a saber's handle, and no effects
that would sterilize the 'nads of anyone near the weapon, etc. etc.
But hey, details.
Anyway, I can accept that more readily than beams of light that
come to a sharp-pointed end and bounce off each other like solid
objects.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245