Tim Cavanaugh | May 28, 2005
As French voters head out to decide the fate of the EU, John Vaught LaBeaume wonders whether the nationalist, protectionist, illiberal devil that you know is better than the supernationalist, regulationist, illiberal devil that, well, you also know.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
When you come to a fork in the road, take it.
I'm for going many forks back and wondering if a the wrong turn was
taken.
I'm inclined to think the US should not have approved its
Constitution, rather stuck with the Continental Congress.
I heard the term "Anglo-Saxon Economics" used today. I heard it
as a reporter summarized Le Pen's position.
...Apparently the far left and far right, unsurprisingly, have
found some common ground.
"That very cacophony of arguments on both sides of the debate,
reflecting a continent of vastly diverse peoples, faiths, and
political traditions, should raise a red flag."
If that is the case, then can someone explain to me why the hell
they're unifying in the first place?
...Apparently the far left and far right, unsurprisingly, have found some common ground.
In France, they appeal to the same people. Racist and afraid.
Akira,
We're "a continent of vastly diverse peoples, faiths, and political
traditions, should raise a red flag."
It's worked out pretty well for us, hasn't it?
I found a BBC article regarding "Anglo Saxon" Economics here.
The term seems to refer to free market capitalism.
...The article, unfortunately, treats us to Gunther Grass' thoughts
on the topic. How can someone who writes so well be so wrong about
so much?
If any country in Europe is associated with free market capitalism, surely it's Austria?
Europe is unifying.
It's making a mistake by rushing it and putting it in
writing.
The US made the same mistake.
We would have unified just as well, plus avoided a big Civil War,
had we continued muddling along with a Continental Congress.
"If any country in Europe is associated with free market
capitalism, surely it's Austria?"
Whilst Hayek, Mises Etc. came from austria, there influence in main
land europe has been limited, Hayak however influenced our very own
Mrs Thatcher, hence why free market economics in europe is refferd
to as the "anglo saxon" or "british Model"
i have no idea what this is but i just wanna say that hawai'i is
beautiful.
---
if people want it to stay beautiful then tourist should stop coming
here. some of them dont even know there are 8 main islands and
thousands of mini ones.
AND
sugar cane was a big export in hawaii. the first sugar plantion in
hawai'i was on Kaua'i in a town called Koloa. the plantaion is
still there today, though it is not functioning. We would continue
with sugar as our major export until we had to compete with other
countries who sold the product for less;thus running us out of a
bussiness.
---
when you think hawaii you probably think pineapples, sunny days on
sandy beaches, grass skirts and coconut bras. this is NOT so.
i live on kaua'i and that is not true. the media has
perceived/portrayed us , as well as the hawaiian race, as lazy and
incompetent.
hawaiians are being judged by american standards. if you are not
able to communicate with proper english, you are considered
uneducated. as a recent honors english final exam assignment at my
highschool, Kamehameha Schools Kapalama Campus, we were asked to
read an one of two articles. the article i chose was about the
intelligence of hawaiians. in hawaii there is a language called
"pidgin". if you didnt know, it uses words/phrases such as "Da
kine" or "Pau". The article compared two people; one with an iQ of
120 the other of 140. one of them was perfect at speaking english.
the other spoke partially in pidgin and didnt speak perfect
english. one person is haole. [haole=white person, normally
forgien,etc] the other is a hawaiian local.lets pretend the
hawaiian locals iQ is 140.
now imagine leaving both in a room alone. if you eavesdropped on a
conversation between them, who would sound more intelligent? the
man who could effectively communicate his thoughts, feelings, etc.
through english; or the man who had many grammatical errors,
confusing expressions, etc.? to majority of educated americans the
haole man would seem smarter.
not all hawaiians are lazy. this assumption has tarnished the
reputation of hawaiians. when forgeiners first came to hawai'i they
were suprised and puzzled by the working hours of native hawaiians.
in ancient hawai'i the work schedule varied. forgeiners thought it
uncanny and senseless to stop work around the mid point of the day.
the fact is hawaiians were intelligent and perfected their system
of living. waking up early to beat the morning sun they worked.
when it became the hotest time of day the work ceased. in hawaii it
can become extremely hot and humid. later they would start up work
again. captian cook arrived in the year 1778 during the time of
Makahiki. this is a time period between the months of october to
about march. makahiki is a time dedicated to Lono, god of
agriculture and peace [among other things]. during this period of
time war was forbidden. even if there was a war going on it would
be postponed until after Makahiki ended. major work stopped.the
ali'i* and followers accompanying him would make their way around
the entire island collecting tributes to Lonoikamakahiki [Lono]. *
ali'i = chief/royalty.
it was an honor to participate. the more a family gave, the more
status/power they contained and were respected. after the trip was
completed, games would begin.
this along with other hasty generalizations has shaped the
conclusion in the minds of americans that hawai'i is full of
mindless lazy savages.
what do you think?
Who'da thunk they were so smuckin' fart o'er dere? I have to tip
my hat to all those French nay-sayers. Since I was just reading a
bit of it and thought I'd share.
"Article II-83 Equality between women and men
Equality between women and men must be ensured in all areas,
including employment, work and pay.
The principle of equality shall not prevent the maintenance or
adoption of measures providing for specific advantages in favour of
the under-represented sex."
Translation: all animals are equal, but some are more equal than
others.
Article II-84:3
"Every child shall have the right to maintain on a regular basis a
personal relationship and direct contact with both his or her
parents, unless that is contrary to his or her interests."
Translation: we will let you know if it's safe to go home.
Now I wonder if any of those who voted for this thing actually read
it.
Eion:
you'd think that'd be the case, but it's not. i've lived there for
more than a year, and it's got some nearly-scandinavian leftie
(sic) qualities, and it's got that good ol' euro-racism to go along
with it. add in a dose of small willie syndrome from the loss of
their empire, and mix in a bunch of euro-nationalism/jingoism on
par with the most frothing types here. that's your austria.
grin.
anglo-saxon: philosophy that's opposed to continental. makes
perfect sense. it's the philosophy that wasn't affected by 1848,
and it individualistic and JS Mill style. Adam Smith is a good call
on that one. but it's opposed to the 1848/frankfurt school.
and thoreau: i think we know how GG would vote. :)
and remember: there's nothing "Liberal" about the FDP in germany,
there's nothing "Liberal" about the EU. they're as full of shit
about that krap as are the big government conservatives here are
when they talk about "freedom". So, Some German Guy, you can't have
what is it - social market economy and talk about Liberalism.
balls. glad it lost. bummed it took the kommies to do it. (as
commies are the worst pig fuckers of the bunch)
here's a shout out to cousin Ben and his buddies in Iraq: kick ass
and come home soon to the ticker tape parade. Be safe. See you
soon!
Well the FDP certainly is not as liberal as I would like them to be. But they are pretty much the only ones who now and then oppose big government. Lesser evil all over again.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245