Kerry Howley | April 1, 2005
French President Jacques Chirac thinks Google is a plague on French culture, so he's asked his culture minister and the head of Bibliotheque Nationale to dream up an organically French search engine. What would that look like? Certainly not like the existing French version of Google, corrupted as it is by the dirty googling masses. The Economist reports:
Why not let Google do the job? Its French version is used for 74 percent of internet searches in France. The answer is the vulgar criteria it uses to rank results.
"I do not believe", wrote Mr Donnedieu de Vabres in Le Monde, "that the only key to access our culture should be the automatic ranking by popularity, which has been behind Google's success."
The answer, of course, is to let right-thinking men decide what ought to be popular:
If popularity cannot arbitrate, what will? Mr Jeanneney wants a "committee of experts". He appears to be serious...
Whole thing here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I do not approve of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it, provided you say it in French.
Makes sense to me. In a country where everyone is liberated, equal, and fraternal someone has to keep the mob moving in the right direction.
Uh, there are other search engines that use a different
algorithm than google that are freely available to everyone.
I suspect the French would define google as a monopoly.
taking away the popular activity of showing how cool you are by
"french bashing" (see earlier comments about "finding france on a
map", etc), this is a good example of static vs dynamic that our
good friend Ms Postrel highlighted in FAIE...
boycotting french products "on principle"? are you serious?
I envision a group of chain-smoking French academics sitting in a room Google-bombing all day long. Assuming they've come down out of their Montparnasse to actually find out how Google bombing works.
Wow, I can't imagine anything along the lines of Google being
sorted by humans.
Though it sounds like Chirac wants to start up a French version of
the book search and scholar.google.com not a whole version
of the search engine.
This reminds me of the Simpsons Australian episode, where a complicated piece of machinery fixed to the toilets at the American embassy makes the water swirl the "correct American way."
Have you verified that this is not an april fools joke?
'He appears to be serious...'
Pub Date is March 31.
This is just another reason to be a Francophile.
The French are just so damn adorable (and amusing) when they're
fretting about the inevitable marginalization of their
culture.
Now I've got to delete the arrosage from ordinateur.
QFMC cos. V
�I simply note that this commercial company is the expression of
the American system, in which the law of the market is king.�
Wow. I just had a moment of profound patriotism.
If popularity cannot arbitrate, what will? Mr Jeanneney
wants a "committee of experts".
For all their talk about "democracy" you will that find most
governing in France (and the rest of Europe, for that matter) is
done by "committee[s] of experts".
We have a presumptive winner for the "Technologically Illiterate Proposal of the Year" competition. Let's see Congress come up with another anti-spam law to give Mr. Jeanneney a run for his money.
Organically French search engine:
Qu'est ce vouz cherchez pour, aujour d'hui?
(What do you wish to search for today?)
euro+conversion+ rates
Est ce que les francs ne sont pas bonnes?
(What, are Francs not good enough for you?!?!?)
euro+conversion+ rates
D'accord, mais, J'ai du cafe maitenent. Je fais ca quand je fais
ca
(Fine, but I'm having my latte right now, I'll look for it when I
get back)
euro+conversion+ rates
Si to arretes mon mange encore, Je vais apprendrez troize semaines
de
vacances, tu chou-chou!
(If you interrupt my long lunch again, I'll file a grievance, and
add
another week to my 12 weeks of paid vacation! You cabbage!)
EURO+CONVERSION+RATES!!!
Je ne peux pas en ce moment je suis baise occupee votre
epouse
(I can't right now, I'm busy screwing your wife.)
Disclaimer: though I wish I could claim the previous post, it was composed by a friend but I thought it worth sharing.
Joke all you want, but France's Minitel network was in ordinary
civilian users' homes back when America's Internet was barely out
of diapers and on the desks of academics. Total Internet user
levels only passed Minitel around 1997.
XMas - a "web directory" style search engine such as Yahoo
Directory is precisely a human-categorized search engine. It's by
no means an unimaginable prospect. Other examples abound, for
example http://dmoz.org/, which operates on a decentralized
volunteer model.
"Joke all you want, but France's Minitel network was in ordinary
civilian users' homes back when America's Internet was barely out
of diapers and on the desks of academics. Total Internet user
levels only passed Minitel around 1997."
You are not seriously going to hold up Minitel as an example of
French technological sophistication, are you?
Jason Ligon,
For its time it was a great system. The whole micropayments
concept, etc. was really cool.
_________________________________________
French culture isn't being marginalized, despite the government's
best efforts to make that the case. :)
"...organically French search engine."
Hmmm, what could that mean? A search engine that only works 35
hours a week?
Geez, the lack of appreciation of voluntary interaction and the assumption that state authority needs to be involved produces the most bizarre aberrations of common sense.
for those of you who pray at the market driven popularity alter I sentence you to 6 hours of listening to commercial radio.
I was under the impression that Minitel is an example of why you
DON'T want everything to become a massive govt project. Imagine if
the US had been run the same way on the same system, we'd currently
have a comittee telling us that the web must not be allowed to go
forward because it is unecessary, does not serve the "public
interest", isn't compatible with their infrastructure, etc. Maybe
30 years from now we'd start to have something along the lines of
internet circa 1995, but of course this would have to be done with
the approval of the experts. Look for broadband to become
widespread somewhere around 2075.
As far as French-bashing is concerned, well what would you be
saying of George Bush himself launched an initiative to mandate the
term "freedom fries", set levels as to how much non-American media
could be broadcast, and started condemning things like Encyclopedia
Brittanica as not American enough? Yet this sort of bizzarre,
jingoistic, xenophobic, arrogant behavior is completely accepted
(and expected) coming from France. Not only that, they then demand
to be seen as the enlightened ones! You tell me who is more part of
the "world community", a nation where cultural mixing is held up as
an ideal, or one where the ideal is to shut it out because all
others MUST be inferior. It's somewhat amusing today, but where is
this attitude going to leave France in 30, 40 years? There was
another country who believed that only they had the special and
proper science, the special and proper culture, the special and
proper literature, then banned and burned all the rest of it. You'd
think the French of all people would see the folly of that
attitude.
The French are just very nationalistic. I do not know why. They also have a plan to launch a Satelite into orbit that will transmit french radio and t.v. stations so that frenchmen around the world are not dependant on the english news media.
Dave,
I found the minitel system very useful. Since it was run by a
public/private corporation, maybe that's how it got to be so
useful. It also seemed to deal with costumer feedback well.
Anyway, I think you are confusing what the government tries to do
vis a vis French culture and what French culture and society
actually do. As I always like to say, France is a very successful
society, culture, etc., despite the government, not because of
it.
And yes, our government also tries to "protect" our culture in
innumberable ways.
Donk,
Certain elements of French society are certainly very
nationalistic; as nationalistic as certai elements of U.S. society
(just go to Paris on Bastille Day).
Jeff:
I accept your sentence. Of course, I enjoy some talk radio, and if
I want music I have choices. Both Sirius and XM are offering 3-day
free trials online. I listened to about six hours of my favorite,
non-profit radio station today. Does that count? They call
themselves a "public" radio station, but they are public the way GM
is a "public" corporation. A private U holds the license. Of
course, when a unit of government, like a state U, holds the
license, I consider that a violation of the First Amendment.
Being opposed to a metastasized government does not mean that one
need be hostile to non-commercial endeavors. Non-profit
educational, cultural and charitable institutions are important in
a free society, for their independence from the government no less
than for the good work they do.
Kevin
Jeff:
for those of you who pray at the market driven popularity alter
I sentence you to 6 hours of listening to commercial
radio.
But that's one of the great things about the market, and liberty in
general. We can just turn off what we don't like.
"IT'S FREEDOM BABY! YEAH!"
Austin Powers
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245