Matt Welch | March 30, 2005
Arianna Huffington -- who apparently no longer needs to be "stopped" -- is launching a big new Web publication/collective, in which Santa Monica's neglected limousine liberals, apparently unsatisfied by merely running Hollywood, will try to catch some of this grassroots blogging buzz.
Based in New York and staffed with a full complement of editors, the Huffington Report appears to be a culture and politics webzine in the classic mold of Salon or Slate. It will have breaking news, a media commentary section called "Eat the Press," and its most interesting innovation, a group blog manned by the cultural and media elite: Sen. Jon Corzine, Larry David, Barry Diller, Tom Freston, David Geffen, Vernon Jordan, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Harry Evans and his wife, Tina Brown. That's just to name a few, and Huffington is still recruiting. [...]
In addition to the list above, her roster includes heavyweights such as real estate and media mogul Mort Zuckerman; magazine publisher Jann Wenner; Hollywood machers like William Morris CEO Jim Wiatt; superproducer Brian Grazer; Endeavor agent Ari Emanuel; writers/directors Nora Ephron, David Mamet, Mike Nichols, Rob Reiner, and David O. Russell; and assorted blue-chip "public intellectuals" like Paul Goldberger, Gary Hart, Norman Lear, and Arthur Schlesinger.
I'd make a joke here, but sometimes the material is just too, um, rich. (Link via Jeff Jarvis.)
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I wonder if it's going to be open for comments from us peons. I'll bring my own shovel.
Well, let's see what they can pump out. It might be a echo chamber or it might not.
Gwyneth Paltrow and Mort Zuckerman; this thing will be a hoot (regardless of its utility)!
Hmm, I thought that Blogs were spontaneously created outlets for spontaneous thoughts from the heart. Manufactured Blogs would seem not to have that same soul behind them, and this one will likely rise to popularity levels rivaling "Air America" in another medium.
...Sen. Jon Corzine (National Taxpayer Union scores: nothing but
"F"s ! - http://tinyurl.com/3n5ow), Mort Zuckerman,Gary Hart,
Norman Lear, Arthur Schlesinger...
Yep, powerful liberals. This enterprise doesn't look like it's
going to be freedom freindly. I suggest (seriously) that you folks
from Reason volunterr yourselves in order to render some balance
and lend intelectual grvitos.
that was the point of my poorly concieved joke. I apologize to everyone that saw it.
Going... into... Shatner mode:
She'll never blog like common people
She'll never blog like common people do
She'll never snark like common people
She'll never watch her blog fade out of view
And stall, and freeze, at 2
When the night is all but through.
Ok. That was two goofs in just two consecutive words-It's really time to rejuvenate my New Year's resolution to start using the Preview Button.
I'll make my gravitas point another way and continue in this "Shatner mode" and say: Huffington's group would really benefit from a Mind Meld with the Reason folks.
Rick Barton,
Hart might have some interesting things to say.
I think you just invented a new snack. :)
Mark: "this one will likely rise to popularity levels rivaling
"Air America" in another medium."
Uh, don't look now, but Air America has actually been doing OK
recently:
"Initially, it looked as if the skeptics would prevail. The ensuing
months were turbulent, at times almost terminal. Air America lost
its Los Angeles and Chicago affiliates. Then it lost its top
executives, Evan Cohen and Mark Walsh, who, as it turned out,
hadn't brought as much money to the table as they had promised. Yet
the new network's ratings began to rise, and stations around the
country began to pick up its programming.
"A year later, new management and more than 50 affiliates -- once
again including Chicago and Los Angeles -- have turned Air America
into one of radio's biggest success stories in recent
history."
http://www.startribune.com/stories/389/5320455.html (I think
registration may be required, but it's free.)
See also http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/03/30/radio.tm/
Gary,
Yeah, Hart could. But we will, no doubt, have to wade thru some of
his BS to get to it.
Intellectual Gravitos-It's a brain food snack!
(Frito-Lay, just email me concerning the rights.)
Rick Barton,
You could compete against "Smart Food" (a favorite snack amongst
liberals).
Stevo Darkly,
Ha ha ha. :)
In more depressing news Mugabe has rigged another election.
pulp reference? niiiiiiiice. gillespie and cavanaugh's pop cult(ure) references wane in comparison.
Let's not even get into Media Rule #1 (Any new media outlet should be welcomed, no matter what). Beats there a heart so hard as not to thrill at the prospect of reading Gwyneth and Barry Diller's unedited pensées? Good on Arianna.
I think that Ariana's move to the left a few years ago was
inspired by her desire to get along with a certain social set,
rather than much consideration of the issues. It's no surprise then
that she's kinda uninteresting.
Stevo Darkly,
Gag me with a spoon! :)
To echo/follow up on Mr. Tim's comment:
Focus people! Several SoCal unhinged dimbulbs (and otherwise...
judge as you see fit) are about to go public with off-the-cuff
thoughts. This is a potential Comstock Lode of quotable hilarity.
Welcome/encourage the genesis of this blog/tarpit.
"Welcome/encourage the genesis of this blog/tarpit."
yeah, seriously. i don't actually see it being unedited, but
doesn't your heart leap a tiny bit at the idea it just might
be?
in the classic mold of Salon or Slate
I wonder if it's the same mold that causes crotch rot.
Didn't this very site get all moony over Arnold
Schwarzenegger's supposed libertarian leanings a year or so
ago? (Oooh! He went to some of our symposia!)
Yeah, yeah. I get hives too when I think about reading opinion
pieces by Rob Reiner and Nora Ephron, but what's with lashing out
at the idea of celebrities writing political think pieces? Why is
it "dynamistic" when some unknown schlub who teaches at a minor
college or works as a paralegal blogs about public policy, but
somehow inherently asinine when a well-known movie producer does?
Surely it's not a class thing: that's not very libertarian. Is it
okay for a libertarian-leaning Hollywood celebrity to write for a
political mag?
I think that every time Ariana's name appears in print it should
be preceded by the description "Wealthy adventuress."
Kevin
Hart might have some interesting things to say.
He's said some interesting things about militias/civic duty.
For the Record I am very very glad about this, and can't wait to see what they'll do. I know one of the guys behind it, and his ideas are very interesting. But it's still funny as hell, on about a thousand different levels. (Starting with the name.)
My vote for unintended funny #1: listing Norman Lear as a blue-chip public intellectual.
I personally think it is wonderful that all these socially concerned and compassionate people are there for us.
There needs to be a Baldwin Blog - staffed by all of them. That would be awesome.
I'd really enjoy a blog with the musings of the intellectual
giants of Hollywood.
You know like Shirley Mclaine, Cher and Sarah Jessica Parker.
"Wanna Blog Like the Common People"
Yeah, I guess the people taking part in this won't have the
proletarian, red-state outlook so common on Tech Central Station or
CATO's website.
Kill the Rich!
"...but somehow inherently asinine when a well-known movie
producer does?"
Because movie producers (and actors, directors, etc.) and others of
that milieu - and you know the milieu I'm talking about even if I
can't quite describe it - are inherently asinine.
You know how certain people - like most of the frequent commenters
on this blog - make immediate assumptions about people from the
southern U.S. who hold particularly strong religious views and
listen to certain musical genres? Immediate assumptions regarding
intelligence, integrity, motivation, personal hygiene, etc? Well, I
make similar immediate assumptions whenever I hear the word
"actor", "director" or "producer," or the name of a famous actor,
director, producer, etc. My assumptions include, but aren't limited
to: spoiled, arrogant, fatuous, shallow, misinformed, indifferently
educated, insufficiently read, self indulgent, self obsessed, self
destructive, prone to panic and perpetually aggrieved about shit
they know little about. Is this fair of me? Probably not. But I
think it's a widely shared prejudice.
One need only avail themself of the endless parade of half-assed
crap coming from the 'entertainment' industry to come to the
conclusion that the people that produce it are asinine. Combine
that with the draconian 'liberal' social policies of Kalifornia
where most of them hang their hats, and then contemplate that they
generally see this as the 'way things should be' and you might
think they were even worse.
Maybe.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245