Matt Welch | March 23, 2005
Internet poker, that is. That's what the state of
South North Dakota is considering, to
gin up a little tax revenue. Meanwhile, Illinois and Georgia are
chewing on bills that would legalize the online sales of state
lottery tickets. Says
USA Today:
Those are the latest assault on the federal Wire Act of 1961, which bans use of telephones to place sports bets. U.S. lawmakers have struggled for a decade to update the law, hoping to restrain the fast-growing, $10 billion-a-year Internet gambling industry.
Link via Howard Owens.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I call him "Gamblor"!
So, gambling is an evil, dastardly vice that should be prohibited
by law, in order to, um, save people from their own bad
judgment.
Unless, of course, the ones profiting from that bad judgment are
the political class. Then it's ok. State-run lotteries in
states where gambling is otherwise illegal is a prime example of
this. So is legalizing certain easily-taxable forms of gambling in
order to generate tax revenue.
If there's anything more disgusting than the political class
legislating morality, it's when those same people make exceptions
to their so-called "principles" in the name of tax revenue (which
they then use to "buy" votes). I have this sinking feeling that
many of these bastard politicians would legalize rape, as long as
they could tax each occurance...
Peter Tosh - Legalize It
Legalize it - don't criticize it
Legalize it and i will advertise it
Some call it tampee
Some call it the weed
Some call it Marijuana
Some of them call it Ganja
Legalize it - don't criticize it
Legalize it and i will advertise it
Singer smoke it
And players of instruments too
Legalize it, yeah, yeah
That's the best thing you can do
Doctors smoke it
Nurses smoke it
Judges smoke it
Even the lawyers too
Legalize it - don't criticize it
Legalize it and i will advertise it
It's good for the flu
It's good for asthma
Good for tuberculosis
Even umara composis
Legalize it - don't criticize it
Legalize it and i will advertise it
Bird eat it
And they leave it
Fowls eat it
Goats love to play with it
Not all that long ago, a couple generations maybe, gambling was
seen as a vice on par with drug abuse and prostitution. Now it's
everywhere and almost considered semi-respectable. Let's hope more
vices go this way.
Looks like all it takes is to point out to politicians how much
money is to be made.
I sure hope SD finds a way around that arcane law, if for
nothing else, so their residents can read
amusing pieces like this in the local paper.
These days, no matter how far you've wedged your head up your ass,
you can always blame the government for not pulling it out for
you.
Actually both linked articles say it is North Dakota considering
doing the legalization.
I know all those Dakotas look alike, right Matt?
Given the fact on how damn easy it is to cheat on Internet Poker (hint: stack a table with buddies, IM each other your hands, just one way to do it), I'd rather play the lottery - at least I would know I am being ripped off.
The ND Senate defeated the bill 44-3.
Response to Don: collusion is possible and happens, but it's not a
deciding danger for any reasonably-aware player. In the late 90s I
said the same -- that collusion would make online poker on a large
scale infeasible. I was wrong.
So now we can include in the definition of libertarians "Republicans who like to gamble"!
James B. -- There are two Dakotas?
Also, I'd just like to take this opportunity to tell Texas Holdem
comments spammers to fuck the hell off, and also to vote
thumbs-down on all state lotteries. Thank you very much.
Most of you are probably too young to remember Jimmy Durante's
line: "Everybody wants to get into the act!"
Government wants to get into the act for the money.
Sad, isn't it? But it proves government to be the parasite that it
is; a parasitic meme.
Collusion is hard to do well and easy to catch for a site that
monitors for such, so it's not really a problem.
Thanks for the link, Matt.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245