Tim Cavanaugh | February 24, 2005
Dave Kopel shows how the second amendment put some steel into the civil rights movement.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
The review's quote from DuBois about the right to engage in
armed self defense shoots down the notion he was a tom who was
afraid to stand up to white racists.
While American blacks thankfully don't face persecution anymore, a
disproportionately large number of them still live in bad
neighborhoods where police protection is so poor it's pretty close
to being the law of the jungle. Of course, this doesn't stop
Democrats and so called "black leaders" (Jesse Jackson, Al
Sharpton, Kweise Mfume, Louis Farakkhan, etc.) from screaming and
crying for more "gun control" and "gun safety" to protect
minorities against "cop killer bullets" and "military style assault
weapons." You'll still hear the likes of them blaming DC, Detroit,
and New York's high crime rates on guns being too widely available.
(Getting beaten to death with a baseball bat doesn't rob someone of
his dignity like shooting him does, so destroying the 2nd
Amendment's the answer.) If politicians and "black leaders" ever
succeeded in reducing crime rates, they'd eliminate one of the
problems that makes a lot of people desparate enough to listen to
them.
Mr X
DuBois is not regarded as an Uncle Tom by the left. He is their
favorite.
I think you might be thinking of Booker T Washington.
X,
You must mean Booker T. Washington. DuBois is loved by many on the
left because he was a leftist; indeed, he was a communist.
Give an oppressed man a gun and he'll figure out a way to assert
his rights.
If it weren't so illegal, I'd like to start a charity to issue
handguns and rifles to middle-aged inner city dwellers. After the
initial unsolved murders ("Officer, I don't know how that crack
dealer got shot 14 times in the head on my doorstep.") and the
inevitable reprisals and massacres by increasingly desperate
criminals, the neighborhoods would become very peaceful.
I don't know why people think they're safer when they're
disarmed.
On the subject of DuBois, there is a dormitory at Penn that bears
his name. Everyone there calls it "Dah-boys" but I would have
thought "Dew-bwah" would be more accurate. Which way did the actual
DuBois pronounce his name?
Which movie was it where the cops were hassling some guys with
rifles and one of the characters spouted the penal code at them
(the cops) and basically told the cops to piss off? That was a good
scene.
If it weren't so illegal, I'd like to start a charity to
issue handguns and rifles to middle-aged inner city
dwellers.
Shouldn't be hard to legalize - just get yourself a federal
firearms dealer license, run background checks per the law, and you
can give away guns to anyone who is a legal recipient of said
gun.
Apostate,
Are you suggesting that someone doesn't have the right to engage in
his trade of selling crack to willing buyers, who harm no one but
themselves with their recreational crack use? Are you saying you'd
murder someone whose career choice you don't approve of,
for the simple crime of walking past your doorstep?
Why can't you libertarians keep your stories straight? : )
Do you really think I could collect charitable donations to just
give guns away in NYC, DC or LA? I thought it was nearly impossible
to legally own a gun in those cities and reasoned that it would be
severely frowned upon to issue guns to people who might use them
to, uhh, clean up the neighborhood, as it were.
It's not like I'd give them to just anyone. Angry grandmothers and
fathers of murdered children seem like two very good target
audiences.
W.E.B. BuBois' last name is pronounced "Dah-boys"? Really? I
learn something new every day here. Thanks, GG. Hmm...
If it weren't so illegal, I'd like to start a charity to issue
handguns and rifles to middle-aged inner city dwellers.
I like that idea. I would call it the "DeBois in the 'Hood
Foundation," but I guess someone (probably a white liberal) might
find that name somehow offensive.
By the way, Liberty magazine (of Port Townsend, WA, not
the religious magazine), once ran an article, "When the NAACP Went
Armed." I think it was in the Dec. 1999 issue but unfortunately is
not available on the Web. (Liberty neglected its Web site
for many years, until recently.)
Anyhow, as I recall, it told of a KKK motorcade that came
barrelling down the street to intimidate or attack a houseful of
civil rights activists who came to town. When they charged onto the
property, the activists fired at them, and the KKK motorcade
reversed out of there with considerable alacrity. Gary Kleck, the
civil rights and 2nd Amendment legal scholar, was there.
This was a few decades ago, and I believe it took place in a town
called Mobile (not in Alabama but somewhere else, I think). This is
where my recollection of the details fails me, but it was a
heartwarming story.
Oh damn.
W.E.B. BuBois = W.E.B. DuBois
"DeBois in the 'Hood Foundation" = "DuBois in the 'Hood
Foundation,"
This was a few decades ago, and I believe it took place in a
town called Mobile (not in Alabama but somewhere else, I
think).
Stevo Darkly
If you read Kopel's article you'll find it about 3/4 of the way
down. It says Monroe, NC.
Quote:
"The fire was blistering, disciplined and frightening. The
motorcade of about eighty cars, which had begun in a spirit of good
fellowship, disintegrated into chaos, with panicky, robed men
fleeing in every direction. Some had to abandon their automobiles
and continue on foot."
I don't want to condone violence but given the ordeals blacks have
suffered I can imagine that the sight of those crackers fleeing
might give one a good deal of satisfaction.
Of course, given our history it could be that the Liberty
story (which I also read but don't recall in detail) referred to an
entirely different, but similar, event.
DuBois in the 'Hood
That is funny enough that it makes up for you stealing Walker's
joke in the previous thread.
"Gun control" allows liberals to express two sentiments which
they would be embarressed to express openly.
1. Classism - They would like for no one but licensed professionals
to possess guns. If you can't afford a licensed professional to
protect you, that's tough.
2. Raceism - It's nice to see multiple articles in Reason which
document this. Nice work guys.
Great article. Here's a good parallel link -
http://www.logicsouth.com/~lcoble/2ndamend/whyfight.txt
.
Isaac Bartram and Gary Gunnels, I'm going to do something that's almost unheard of on Hit and Run. I admit I got my facts wrong. More importantly, I also apologize to anyone who got the wrong idea because of the language I used in my initial post to describe how many people think of Booker T. Washington (who I confused with DuBois).
Stevo Darkly,
I got a rough talking to once by a DuBois scholar about this very
issue; they get pretty fucking sensitive about his name. Anyway,
that's how said his name (likely the change in pronunciation is due
to the Americanization of the name) and that's how scholars, etc.
still say it. Living in northern New England you run across all
sorts of folks with French surnames who pronounce them in rather
odd ways (odd to me at least). My wife works with a woman whose
surname is "Lemoi," yet she pronounces it "Le-moise" (moise
sounding like noise).
Gary G: Thanks, you've probably saved me from getting hollered
at by an enraged DuBois scholar.
I should be more aware of the way French names get Americanized,
living in St. Louis where we have such street names as Gravois
(GRAV-oy -- pronouncing it "gruh-vwah" marks you as an
out-of-towner) and St. Denis (Saint Dennis). And come to think of
it, only out-of-town foreigners call the city "Saint Louie" --
residents never call it anything but "Saint Lewis." (Or "The Lou"
if you're hip-hop.)
Isaac Bartram: If you read Kopel's article you'll find it about
3/4 of the way down. It says Monroe, NC.
That is the very incident I was thinking of, thank you! I remember
now it involved a segregated swimming pool. Sorry, I should have
carefully read the entire article, but an enduring, focused
attention span is not one of my strong po
Anyway, DuBois was a pathbreaking scholar for his time. He was one of the first historians to chuck the "moonlight and magnolias" interpretation of the ante-bellum that had so dominated historical scholarship in that area since the last decades of the 19th century. Though his doctrinaire Marxist vision has since suffered a de-bunking, he contributed to the understanding of American slavery by actually studying the lives of the slaves as opposed to the study of what masters thought of slavery.
....but an enduring, focused attention span is not one of my
strong po....
chuckle
Great article, thanks for bringing us more informative, rational historical analysis. If only this was the sort of story that made it into the history books they forced us to read in school; I think a lot more kids would be interested in brothers and sisters doing it for themselves than 100 years of "well, black people lived in America after slavery was abolished, but nothing happened until the Civil Rights movement".
I'm surprised that joe hasn't shown up on this thread. He was
all over the last one... Probably just lying low after the
thrashing he took last time.
NCDan,
What an exceptionally accurate depiction. That one's going in my
file of "keepers."
DuBois did not really sign up with the pro-Communist left until
his later years. At the time he wrote the quoted article for *The
Crisis* he was well within the mainstream of African American
opinion.
Harold Cruse in *The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual*, written a
few decades ago, summed it up best (p. 335): "Regrettably, the
winning over of W.E.B. DuBois was a grand feather-in-the-caps of
the incompetent Communist Party leadership. Yet as an individual,
DuBois' intellectual reputation stands above and beyond the
influences of Marxist Communism--a philosophy which aded nothing to
*his* intellectual stature..."
Isaac: ["The fire was blistering, disciplined and frightening.
The motorcade of about eighty cars, which had begun in a spirit of
good fellowship, disintegrated into chaos, with panicky, robed men
fleeing in every direction. Some had to abandon their automobiles
and continue on foot."
I don't want to condone violence but given the ordeals blacks have
suffered I can imagine that the sight of those crackers fleeing
might give one a good deal of satisfaction.]
Pardon me, but if the government takes away the black's firearms
and allows the "robed men" to burn down homes and assault and
murder the people living in them, "in a spirit of good fellowship"
of course, isn't that, well, pretty close to "condoning
violence?"
Sort of like the anti-gun folks today who say that when a criminal
pulls a weapon and climbs in your bedroom window, allowing you to
have a pistol to shoot back is "condoning violence."
Larry A
Perhaps I should have said "..take pleasure in.." rather than
"..condone..".
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245