Jesse Walker | December 20, 2004
David Hackett Fischer's Albion's Seed is one of those essential books that everyone who wants to understand American history ought to read. His latest effort, Liberty and Freedom, sounds pretty interesting too -- though far from flawless, to judge from Virginia Postrel's review in yesterday's New York Times.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Fischer's pattern is the equivalent of taking a brilliant
Saturday Nite Live sketch and making a movie of it. He goes too far
when he traces the patterns of memes for decade after decade.
I have the book, Albon's Seed, because it does a great and detailed
job of explaining the origins of my people, the hillbillies, or the
Scots-Irish.
Come to think of it, he could have made more of the co-evolution of
hillbilly and "soul" mores.
I predict a new US political consensus, led by the inheritors of
the Scots-Irish tradition. It will consist of Libertarianism at
home and neo-conservatism abroad.
It has the advantage of conforming to traditional, respectable,
American pragmatism, and provides the chattering classes with
something to deplore.
"I have the book, Albon's Seed, because it does a great and
detailed job of explaining the origins of my people, the
hillbillies, or the Scots-Irish."
You know, Ruthless, until you started on the Scots-Irish thing a
little while ago, I had this idea that you were a brother.
I don't know why ...
Jason Ligon,
You mean "bro"?
We do live in da 'hood.
Mike Lenox,
You could be onto something. According to James Webb--author of
"Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America"--Dubya has
co-opted--thanks to Karl Rove--the Scots-Irish 'values' .
For my part, Dubya can dial back quite a bit on the
neo-conservatism abroad.
While my people would be the first to agree that some people just
need killin,' I don't think it's an automatic because they're
foreigners. We are able to differentiate between blood lust and
self-preservation.
Anyone who attempts to draw a semantic distinction between synonyms loses me. Anyone who does so on the basis of the words' etymology really, really, really loses me. Does Fischer also think that Germans "lust" after food, rock music, etc., or that Spanish speakers feel "molested" by anything that happens to annoy them?
Ruthless, Mike,
The eggheads over at TCS are always going on about Walter Russell
Mead's theory of the "Jacksonians" (as in Andrew Jackson) that is
very nearly what you describe, with rural Scots-Irish roots (aka,
"Sons of the Earth").
Here's one essay that sums up the Jacksonian mindset:
http://www.techcentralstation.com/110504J.html
I've posted about the Jacksonians here before, so apologies if I'm
being redundant. It's an interpretation that makes sense to me.
David Hackett Fischer's Albion's Seed is one of those
essential books that everyone who wants to understand American
history ought to read.
Not really. There are about four or five hundred more important
books on American history.
Fischer's evidence is far too fuzzy to be convincing (and far to
conclusory), he disingenuously ignores evidence of radical
differences within regions and he ignores the deep impact of
African cultures on the U.S. Part of the regional revivalism that
was so popular in the 1980s, Fischer does not account for the major
changes that occurred within regions over time; his analytical
model simply can't deal with the dyanmism of a region like New
England. Its an absolutely horrid and overly simplistic book and I
wouldn't wish it upon my worst enemy.
Slag,
There is a picture of Old Hickory in Albion's Seed.
I grew up in Old Hickory, TN. My ancestors had dealings with the
asshole. I feel pretty sure, behind his back, they might have said
the lead from so many duels caused him to be like a pugnacious
Gerry Ford--playing football without a helmet.
Check out Albion's Seed for a more fair and balanced stereotype of
my people.
Who's the Scotch-Irish private dick
that's a sex machine to all the chicks?
Ruthless!
You're damn right...
Who is the man
that would risk his neck for his brother man?
Ruthless!
Can ya dig it?
Who's the cat that won't cop out
when there's danger all about?
Ruthless!
Right on...
You see this cat Ruthless is a bad mother--
Shut your mouth!
But I'm talkin' about Shaft!
Then we can dig it!
He's a complicated man
but no one understands him but his woman...
Damn -- I was supposed to change that last "Shaft" to "Ruthless," obviously ...
Mr. Lenox gets it:
Libertarianism at home, neo-con "Jacksonianism" abroad. This is the
new paradigm.
You don't like it? Dial up your meds, and get ready to clutch your
Europhilic disaffection ever more tightly.
We old-school Scots-Irish Americans were psycho enough to run the
King's troops out of this country, kill any "Indian savages" who
got in our way, and start a libertarian "whisky rebellion" against
the damn feds back when the feds were brand new.
Nowadays, we're cross-breeding with the African American hip-hop
nation. (Just watch a couple Springer or Montel shows for proof.)
This is like Yosemite Sam cross-breeding with the Road Runner.
Y'all ain't seen nothin yet.
Check out Albion's Seed for a more fair and balanced
stereotype of my people.
Ever read
Salvation on Sand Mountain? That's as close to your people as I
want to get.
You guys got the point, my honky-tude notwithstanding. By
'brother', I meant 'bro' or 'brotha'.
Stevo rocks.
If you're going by Walter Russell Meade's categories, neocon
foreign policy isn't Jacksonian. It's Wilsonian.
Afghanistan was a Jacksonian war. Iraq is a Wilsonian war that got
public support by convincing people it was Jacksonian. I don't
think there's a single person in the top levels of the Bush
administration whose thinking on foreign policy questions fits the
Jacksonian tradition. Initially I thought Bush himself might fit
the bill, but it became obvious a long time ago that he's just
playing a role.
Mr. Walker, re: Afghanistan not being Iraq:
You're assuming us ingn'rant hillbillies can tell "Ay-rabs" in one
part o'the Middle East from "Ay-rabs" in another.
It's all one big Jacksonian war to me.
Kinda like WWII, nothin like Nam.
The damn Saudis are lucky we didn't invade their ass yet. Warn't
too long ago I saw me a bumper sticker said: "Nuke 'em all. Take
the oil."
Yeah, it was tongue in cheek, but it's a significant sort of joke,
if you catch my drift....
Slag, I'll bet McClain will agree with me that "our people"
mostly look down our noses at snake-handlers and the like.
Now let's talk about liberty and freedom as interpreted by "our
people" as well as African-Americans.
I just remembered I had this quote handy from James Webb:
The decline in public education and the outsourcing of jobs has hit
this culture hard. Diversity programs designed to assist minorities
have had an unequal impact on white ethnic groups and particularly
this one, whose roots are in a poverty-stricken South. Their sons
and daughters serve in large numbers in a war whose validity is
increasingly coming into question. In fact, the greatest
realignment in modern politics would take place rather quickly if
the right national leader found a way to bring the Scots-Irish and
African Americans to the same table, and so to redefine a formula
that has consciously set them apart for the past two centuries.
"Libertarianism at home, neo-con "Jacksonianism" abroad"
Sounds a bit like Goldwater conservatism. Though I suspect that
Goldwater would've been relatively skeptical about the need to
invade Iraq.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245