Jesse Walker | December 13, 2004
I know nearly nothing about Samuel Bodman, Bush's pick to take over the Department of Energy. But apparently Hernando de Soto is a fan.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Didn't he discover the Pacific or the Andes or something? Why is he speculating on Ennergy Sec'y in the 21st century?
The downside of this would seem to be that Bodman is now "lost"
to Treasury.
And while I am encouraged by deSoto's endorsement, let us put it in
its place. It suggests that Bodman is a bright man, and that is
always good to hear. But giving high praise to a man because his
"understanding of how markets work" -- well, what the hell does
that say about the rest of the Bush administration's economic team?
In addition, I think it is a bit much to say, from this
endorsement, that Bodman has a "discriminating mastery of powerful
economic ideas" -- Perhaps deSoto laid out a stronger case for
Bodman, but it is not given here.
Finally, the cheap snub about journalists not understanding
chemical engineering...Well, it's a cheap snub. I don't know what
else to say. Bodman received his Ph.D. in chem. eng. at MIT, then
managed to hang around as an associate prof. at MIT for six years
before leaving to work at a venture captal firm and never looking
back. There is no mention of what sort of scientific work he did,
though his thesis work was on heat transfer in nonequilibrium
chemical reactions. There are few reference I can find to any
papers he wrote, though, to be fair, his work would be old enough
that citations might be difficult to track down electronically. I
read this as the biography of a scientist who felt more at home at
business. This is perfectly fine, but let us not oversell his
unique capacity to understand the scientific issues at play in
energy policy. In fact, I am perfectly willing to believe that it
is possible to craft good energy policy while knowing next to
nothing at all about heat transfer in nonequilibrium chemical
reactions.
And as someone who works with many MIT science grads, under and
post, let me assure you that a scientific degree from MIT in no way
assures that you understand math.
Sorry, I'm in a cranky mood this morning. To reiterate: The quote
from de Soto is encouraging, but the hype from the linked post is
annoying.
Anon
No, Anon, it's all too true. Like all of us at Reason, I'd dreamed longingly of an engineer's life until a "B" in calc crushed my dreams forever. Nobody would choose a career in media except out of desperation when their math skills proved inadequate.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245