Reason.com
Most Popular Stories
- 5 Classic Teen Sex-and-Drug Freakouts: Rainbow Parties, Butt-Chugging, And So Much More (By Which We Mean Less) (5.27)
- Government Beneficiaries and Other Fairy Tales (5.26)
- Do Organic Consumers Shop Exclusively at the Jerk Store? (5.26)
- Sharon Presley on Libertarian Feminism (5.26)
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|11.30.04 @ 3:48PM|#
Please, all Shafer did was verify that the term used by Safire wasn't journalistic vernacular, which says nothing about the accuracy of the charge.
|11.30.04 @ 3:55PM|#
"keeper" versus spiked
And to think Safire has been known to criticize his colleague and my sweetie, Maureen Dowd, for using esoteric words.
|11.30.04 @ 4:46PM|#
I'm not surprised Safire knows words that other people don't: he's been in the business a long time (he's probably got 20 years on any of the journalists Shafer asked), and he writes books on language, for heaven's sake. And, as wellfellow points out, Shafer seems to think if he can't find enough references to the term, that he's somehow proved the practice is rare or non-existent. Here's a recent one: the LA Times' late sexual harassment hit on Arnold, just before the recall election.
Morat|11.30.04 @ 5:19PM|#
You are aware that just BECAUSE a story comes at a politically oppurtune time doesn't mean that the story's release was politically timed, right?
|11.30.04 @ 6:03PM|#
Morat: It's not conclusive, but there's some evidence that the LA Times' stories were politically timed.
Tim Higgins|11.30.04 @ 6:24PM|#
Wellfellow,
See title of post. Thank you.
|11.30.04 @ 7:20PM|#
Papa,
There's much stronger evidence than that:
http://www.jillstewart.net/php/issues/issue1014.php
|12.1.04 @ 8:55AM|#
Tim,
Point taken, however, if the thrust of the story had been that Safire was merely being nitpicked, that'd be rather banal. Let us not pretend that Shafer was genuinly interested in etymology. So, Tim, read between the lines. Thank you.
Morat, did anyone suggest that?
Tim Higgins|12.1.04 @ 11:20AM|#
wellfellow,
I may have misunderstood your remark - did you mean it to be directed at Shafer (I took it to be directed at Welch)? I agree entirely that Shafer's article was petty, and I'd infer from the headline that Welch agrees. In fact, Shafer is "nitpicking," but that is a criticism, not a description. I'm sure Shafer thought (foolishly) that he was casting doubt on Safire's conclustion. In any case, my bad if your remark was directed at Shafer and not Welch.