Reason.com
Most Popular Stories
- 5 Classic Teen Sex-and-Drug Freakouts: Rainbow Parties, Butt-Chugging, And So Much More (By Which We Mean Less) (5.27)
- Government Beneficiaries and Other Fairy Tales (5.26)
- Do Organic Consumers Shop Exclusively at the Jerk Store? (5.26)
- Sharon Presley on Libertarian Feminism (5.26)
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|11.29.04 @ 7:41PM|#
Heh heh heh
Heh heh
Don't be so what yourself?
Heh heh
|11.29.04 @ 7:42PM|#
Hard on
Hee hee hee
Hee hee
|11.30.04 @ 8:47AM|#
The first, cheapest, and arguably best reason to despise someone is because he is rich, famous, and powerful. Bonus points if he works in your profession and carries on like a self-important jackass.
Feh - the same applies to countless sports "stars" that Americans revere... This is the second time in two days you guys are despising someone for their wealth (the first was that safe-toy lawyer). What gives? Are we on a crusade now to discern the ethical validity of every celebrity's wealth? Because that could take a long, long time.
|11.30.04 @ 9:38AM|#
I still like Dan.
|11.30.04 @ 9:43AM|#
in certain circles - mostly those outside this particular sphere - "libertarian" is indeed a 1=1 translation for "gagging on rich peoples' cocks."
so take heart rhywun.
|11.30.04 @ 10:11AM|#
... and I'm poor.
|11.30.04 @ 11:21AM|#
I enjoyed Matt's article. Dan reminds me of "agreeable" politicians who haved honed the practice of saying Yes, It's Surely Terrible And I'm Gonna Do Something About It to a fine edge and then go about their business of same-old same-old.