Nick Gillespie | October 19, 2004
Or at least be very clearly warned not to exceed "three to four units [of booze] a day for men, two or three for women".
That's according to new warning labels on hooch being introduced by Brit brewer Scottish and Newcastle. Except that the labels are not warning labels (got that? have another three or four units--or two to three if you're a woman--and it'll all make sense, really [hiccup]):
Scottish and Newcastle told the BBC the move did not amount to a health warning, but was the result of a decision to provide the consumer with more information.
The decision comes in the light of growing bad publicity about the UK's binge drinking culture.
It is likely the rest of the country's brewers will follow suit.
And don't sweat it--the new bottles will let you know how many "units" they be.
Can't we just skip to what will someday be known as the Joe Jackson label: Everything Gives You Cancer: No caffeine, No protein, No booze or Nicotine.
[A tip o' the glass to Neil Hrab!]
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
In my opinion, it's quite useful to know how much of a product will put one in a state of not being able to use one's ability to choose.
Gotta love a Traffic reference. I have "Low Spark of High Heeled Boys" on the desk in front of me this morning.
Am I the only one one that carefully reads the fineprint on my pack of cigaretts every time before I'm about to smoke them? And the toaster, I was almost going to throw it in the bathtub, but then read the warning on the product guide. Cant tell you how many mornings I have walked out the door with my socks on over my shoes because the socks didnt come with an instruction manual.
Is there something un-libertarian about a company voluntarily
providing their customers with information about the use of their
product?
It would be nice if you would stop opposing things based on who you
suspect might be for it, but I'm not holding my breath.
Is there something un-libertarian about a company
voluntarily providing their customers with information about the
use of their product?
No, but the damned gubmint regulators so beloved by the likes of
American League Champion Boston Red Sox-fan joe
have stopped manufacturers and vendors from self-labeling, on the
grounds that if the label isn't specifically mandated and approved
by FDA or whoever it will be inherently misleading. Remember the
fight over whether dairies or groceries could label milk as coming
from cows not administered BGH?
It is a lovely fix. Put your own warning on, and the Feds scream at
you that it isn't official. Leave it off, and the personal injury
lawyers come at you because some idiot used a powered plumbers'
snake to clean the wax out of his ears.
Kevin
Celebrex
Lawsuit Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30
Celebrex
side effects Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30
Celebrex
death Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30
Celebrex
danger Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30
Celebrex
class-action lawsuit and Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30 of
course
Celebrex
attorney and Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30 of course
Celebrex
lawyer Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30
Celebrex
stroke and Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30
Celebrex
recall Monday 27 December 2004 01:19:30
Celebrex
heart attack
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245