Reason.com
Most Popular Stories
- 5 Classic Teen Sex-and-Drug Freakouts: Rainbow Parties, Butt-Chugging, And So Much More (By Which We Mean Less) (5.27)
- Government Beneficiaries and Other Fairy Tales (5.26)
- Do Organic Consumers Shop Exclusively at the Jerk Store? (5.26)
- Sharon Presley on Libertarian Feminism (5.26)
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
Highway|10.7.04 @ 3:21PM|#
I have a better idea: instead of just repealing the Wellstone amendment, how about repealing the whole awful law? The best description of it I've ever seen is "McCain - Feingold Incumbent Protection Act". Too bad it would hurt the legislators where it counts, their ass in their Congressional chair, to repeal it.
No sarcastic comment is strong enough to finish up this post. Just repeal this misbegotten law.
|10.7.04 @ 3:34PM|#
Re: "Not everybody can be media"
Well, thanks for taking away the first amendment. Freedom of the press no longer applies to "We, the people", but is now limited to the people the government approves of.
Warren|10.7.04 @ 6:09PM|#
Will we ever appoint justices to the SCOTUS who can read English at the grade school level?
Highway|10.8.04 @ 10:01AM|#
Warren, I think that would probably be preferable to the college English Lit. class level that everything is read at now, searching for motivations of the authors, and hidden meanings, and context of the time, and subtexts of personal strife. Maybe we need to get people who haven't taken any college english classes at all.