To bookend Julian's update on the Induce Act, here's a piece on the non-piracy uses of peer-to-peer networks. With half of Congress acting like P2P nets are evil, bit-ripping calutrons, it's good info.
Jeff Taylor | October 7, 2004
To bookend Julian's update on the Induce Act, here's a piece on the non-piracy uses of peer-to-peer networks. With half of Congress acting like P2P nets are evil, bit-ripping calutrons, it's good info.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
|10.7.04 @ 7:54PM|#
You know there is also a piece in Wired about that particular monstrosity.
|10.7.04 @ 8:07PM|#
Crap, you mentioned it earlier.
|10.7.04 @ 9:38PM|#
He links to the definition. LOL. That's a classic. Jeff, I like your style.
|10.7.04 @ 10:38PM|#
My favorite legal use of P2P is http://www.threedegrees.com
If you manage to find 3 or so people who just want to hang out and chat and listen to some music, it's pretty cool. Or even if you just want to partake and let one other person be your DJ while you work or something.