Tim Cavanaugh | September 17, 2004
Jacob Sullum on the upcoming RICO trial against tobacco companies.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
>sigh<<br />
It's articles like this that make me ashamed to be a part of the US
political process.
This is the new face of Philip Morris. The company hopes it
will help fend off a potentially ruinous federal lawsuit that
portrays the leading cigarette manufacturers as participants in a
five-decade conspiracy to defraud the public. As the trial,
scheduled to begin on Tuesday, gets under way, the tobacco
companies want everyone to know that 1) they didn't really do
anything wrong and 2) they've changed their ways.
Some in the tobacco industry also state that PM is trying to screw
over its competitors in the process; that this is the reason why
they favor regulation of their industry by the FDA.
Thank God George W. Bush is president! Imagine what those nanny-state Democrats would do if they were running the country. I'll be sure to vote for him this November so we can keep Big Government out of our lives.
SR,
Just wait until you see what the Bush administration has to say
about second-hand smoke; he'll Bloomberg us with more junk science
I am sure.
I'll be sure to vote for him this November so we can keep
Big Government out of our lives.
Very nice now that Big Government has given away to Huge
Government and soon to be followed by Astronomical Government
regardless of which party controls the White House.
Imagine what those nanny-state Democrats would do if they were
running the country.
About the same as we have now, maybe with smaller deficits,
though.
What PM and RJR ought to do, right now, is just flat out declare
bankruptcy. Declare a big dividend to shareholders, divest of any
other interests, and go to the banks and say, sorry, we're going
down.
Doing so would eliminate any remaining payments on that settlement,
end all future lawsuits... and get governments and everyone else
behind smoking to recoup lost tax dollars.
Enough of this shit.
Freddy Krueger,
Not quite. Under Chapter 7 and 11, the last folks to get any money
out of a bankruptcy are the shareholders. Indeed, if some of the
settlements, etc., have led to liens being placed against RJR, etc.
property, those folks are GUARANTEED via under the Constitution to
a piece of the pie.
As to the issue of future lawsuits, that is also not as clear cut
as you imply that it is.
Freddy Krueger,
BTW, if they were to follow your legal advice and disburse said
funds, they would be in violation of the automatic stay, and be
liable for contempt (amongst other things). I sure the fuck hope
you aren't a bankruptcy attorney.
Gary, babe, I hope you're not invested in anything aside from
index funds.
I wasn't talking about a piece of the pie. I'm saying a beforehand
disperal of cash, like Ford did.
Then bamn. Oops. Too many suits. We're broke. Everyone can go divvy
up the pieces. The states, to date, are claming $300-something
billion out of MO and RAI through settlement. The two firms,
combined, have market caps of roughly $110 billion, something I'd
assume to be less whenever the Kraft divestment is complete (MO
also got out of beer).
If the execs play it right, they can still get paid. And states can
look at tax revenue floating down the toilet.
Have any chapter you'd like, the states that have already done
things (like sell tobacco-backed bonds in expectation of future
revenues), would be fucked.
I can dream, can't I?
(and MO's divestments, given *declining* revenues in their core
business, is a fascinating maneuver... but then I don't suppose you
know how RJR bought Nabisco Group Holdings in an all-stock
transaction of a shell company that gave the tobacco maker some $3
billion in cash...)
Freddy Krueger,
I wasn't talking about a piece of the pie. I'm saying a
beforehand disperal of cash, like Ford did.
Depending on the nature of such disbursements, they will be drawn
back into the bankruptcy estate if they were made between 90 days
and a year before the bankruptcy is declared. Sorry, there are
plenty of provisions in the Bankruptcy Code to deal specifically
with such an act; furthermore, creditors and other parties that are
owed significant sums aren't stupid (remember, your plan would have
these companies cheat other private entities who have supplied
these companies with with goods and services out of money as well)
- they constantly check for the very thing that you argue for.
Gary, anyone so... involved as to be posting this late when not
waiting on word from the ISP that it's OK to go home is likely to
be, if not an actual attorney, at least of the genetic
pre-disposition where such is a likely career.
That said, MO is giving out a big dividend to its shareholders, a
company by the name of "Kraft," whose best products are sold under
the logo "Nabisco." The firm is currently marjority-owned and
shares the same CEO as MO, but won't forever.
RJR (or rather NGH, one-time parent company of RJR and Nabisco),
did a similar thing a few years ago after the settlement, and after
selling off key, lucrative assets (RJR Asia to
Japan Tobacco, and Nabisco to Philip Morris).
I'm pretty sure, with the possible exception of biotech, that
NGH/RJR (up approximately 1000% since 01 when Carl Icahn bought
in... two days after me ^_^) was the best-performing stock of the
last 3 years, even before you include the ridiculous yield (still
at 5% on the dividend... guess I sold too early).
However, if you think either MO or RJR (sorry, RAI now) will even
be in business in a couple of years, whether or not the latest case
goes through, you're whacked.
The execs have made their money, and neither the states nor the
trial lawyers will be getting all the dough they've *earned*.
Governments will, at that point, have to consider bailing out the
companies whose products they demonize, or else deal with the
generics, which while pumping money into coffers, don't have the
excess liability required to fund pet projects (let alone the dough
to keep promising young students from the better colleges employed
telling me smoking is "bad.")
It's an Ayn Rand scenario.
PS: Vis-a-vis bankruptcy. There are already weird supply issues
with tobacco products... some stores just ain't carrying RAI
inventory near me (DCish). How come?
The states have misdirected all the money from backy suits into
general revenue, borrowed against future revenue to do the same and
now are in partnership with the companies they sued. Meanwhile, my
pack of squares is costing almost as much as my beer.
Can I dust off my old hydroponics set and grow my own tobacco? Any
agronimists out there?
Gadfly,
The states not only misdirected "backy suit" money but the taxes
that were originally imposed on tobacco because of its health
risks. Those taxes were more than enough to cover the Medicare and
Medicaid costs associated with tobacco related illness.
I don't know much about growing tobacco, but I understand it
requires a lot of attention. It also requires specialized treatment
after harvest, drying, blending etc. It takes several varieties of
tobacco, often from different places, to make a cigarette. I would
think that all this militates against "growing your own".
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245