Julian Sanchez | September 13, 2004
The New America Foundation's Steve Clemons finds it odd that the Pentagon's issued a press release denouncing Seymour Hersh's new book. The way the release is worded, it sounds like they're reacting to what they expect to find in the book, but there's no sign that they took the simple step of asking the publisher for a galley copy to check.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Based on media inquiries, it appears that Mr. Seymor Hersh's
upcoming book apparently contains many of the numerous
unsubstantiated allegations and inaccuracies which he has made in
the past based upon unnamed sources.
It seems the Pentagon is reacting to the opposition's anticipation.
That's a present reaction to a past event which regarded the
future. Not that complicated, really.
The same tactic of repeating unsubstantiated allegations has
created a "cloud of doubt" around the military service of both Bush
and Kerry.
Sounds like the same amount of honest evaluation that the neocons in the Pentagon put into the attack on Iraq.
OT - apologies
http://www.guardian.co.uk/russia/article/0,2763,1303957,00.html
Putin gave himself/govt more power since the govt FAILED against
terrorism with its current powers!
I wish ... Oh, well, never mind.
Of course, if they had asked to see a galley, you'd all be
complaining about how they're trying to intimidate
dissenters.
Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Actually, I think it's more like, damned if the run a dishonest, incompetent war, damned if they torture prisoners and refuse to take responsibility for it.
Sounds like the same amount of honest evaluation that the
neocons in the Pentagon put into the attack on Iraq
"Neocon: A member of the current or opposition governments or
intelligence services of the United States, United Kingdom, France,
Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain, Canada, Czechoslovakia, or other
Western nations"
- The Rick Barton Dictionary.
Dan,
"Neocon: A member of the current or opposition governments or
intelligence services of the United States, United Kingdom, France,
Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain, Canada, Czechoslovakia, or other
Western nations"
Most nations were far more circumspect in their claims about the
Iraqi regime and WMDs. The spin has always been from the hawk side
that the foreign intelligence agencies of even Germany, Russia,
etc., admitted that the Iraqis possessed or likely possessed WMDs,
when in fact the intelligence agencies of many of these other
nations were far more agnostic than is generally acknowledged.
Standard Bush administration thought process; if we would like it to be true, it must be true (greeted with flowers, WMDs in Iraq, tax cuts increase revenues, Chalabi has legitimacy). If we don't want it to be true, it must be bogus (global warming).
Are we to believe the content of the Iraq report that Powell
presented at the UN and described as; "valuable intelligence" but
turned out to be an altered, plagiarized and dated grad student
thesis was actually believed by those in the Pentagon who put it
forth?
Lies of such magnitude would have landed them in prison had they
been corporate CEO's instead of government officials.
Powelll's former WMD intelligence chief, Greg Thielmann, contradicts Powell's claims that he wasn't told the information was shoddy.
joe,
Here's a story that covers Powell's claim and Greg Thielmann's
objection to it:
http://tinyurl.com/6j4nx
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245