Reason.com
Best Blogs—Politics and Elections (Help H&R Out!)
Dear Loyal Readers (who are among the smartest, handsomest, and most beautiful souls on the planet),
Do Hit & Run a favor, whydon'tcha, and give us a plug at the Washington Post's Best Blogs - Politics and Elections Readers' Choice Awards.
Right wing. Left wing. Indifferent. Irreverent. There's a blog for every taste, opinion and attitude. washingtonpost.com's 2004 Best Blogs - Politics and Elections Readers' Choice Awards is your chance to speak out and vote for your favorite politics and election blogs.
From now until September 3, we'll be taking nominations from the blogosphere on the best weblogs from this political season. Whose rants could give Dennis Miller a run for his money? Who's making the best use of the technology? Who will be around long after the hype has died down?
More info here.
As they say in Chicago, vote early and vote often.
Thanks--
Most Popular Stories
- 5 Classic Teen Sex-and-Drug Freakouts: Rainbow Parties, Butt-Chugging, And So Much More (By Which We Mean Less) (5.27)
- Government Beneficiaries and Other Fairy Tales (5.26)
- Do Organic Consumers Shop Exclusively at the Jerk Store? (5.26)
- Sharon Presley on Libertarian Feminism (5.26)
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
drf|8.17.04 @ 1:00AM|#
Is there a category for "Most Shamelessly Self-Promoting"?
how about lonewacko?
drf|8.17.04 @ 1:02AM|#
d'oh...
too slow...
|8.17.04 @ 1:21AM|#
drf,
The Dept of Health thread is the next one up... ;)
drf|8.17.04 @ 1:27AM|#
crimethink:
ROFLMAO :)
(i saw that a few minutes later, too. not my day)
cheers,
drf
|8.17.04 @ 3:06AM|#
"Hee hee, you know I kid. Besides, the competition would be pretty fierce in that category, especially if a certain poster whose name begins with L, ends with O, and has ONEWACK in between gets nominated..."
Most Implausible Theory Of Mexican Territorial Expansion?
The Lonewacko Blog|8.17.04 @ 3:45AM|#
Hee hee, you know I kid. Besides, the competition would be pretty fierce in that category, especially if a certain poster whose name begins with L, ends with O, and has ONEWACK in between gets nominated...
Ho ho ho! Actually, I decided not to nominate myself for this contest. Unlike "crimething" I have actual content and it's frequently at odds with that in the mainstream press and the mainstream blogs. I don't need to be one of the WaPo's pets.
Jason: do some reading before speaking.
|8.17.04 @ 8:39AM|#
I thought I was tight already with the Washington Post site, but nay. (They even send me the daily thing.)
I had noticed before that their web site is user unfriendly even for moi, as a "subscriber."
After jumping through more hoops than I would have cared to, trying to do my duty for Nick, and still landing on square one, I'm thinking you don't want their steenking affirmation.
Whomever they rank as the best blog site we can enjoy ridiculing.
After that, we can ridicule the Washington Post site.
I was looking forward to slipping in a plug for AntiWar.com.
|8.17.04 @ 11:04AM|#
The categories make this place difficult to pigeonhole, so I did "Most Original", "Best Rant", and "Best Outside the Beltway".
I feel handsomer already.
|8.17.04 @ 11:24AM|#
Nick,
This thing came out a month ago - I had already nominated you guys for a couple of things (voting hadn't started yet). Are you now pushing the second round, or something?
Or, are you just late noticing it?
Pete Guither|8.17.04 @ 11:30AM|#
It seems to me, based on the category choices, that the blogging contest doesn't understand blogging.
|8.17.04 @ 12:00PM|#
will we have independent observers to ensure our voting rights are honored?
|8.17.04 @ 12:01PM|#
Is there a category for "Most Shamelessly Self-Promoting"?
|8.17.04 @ 12:03PM|#
Victoria Postrel would never have begged for votes.
|8.17.04 @ 12:04PM|#
zorel,
thanks for the early plugs. this isn't the second round or anything; i'm just a day late and a dollar short on this one, which takes some of the sting out of crimethink's comment.
|8.17.04 @ 12:40PM|#
nostalgic,
you are right, "victoria" would have no reason to bleg for votes; "virginia" on the other hand, ... :-)
|8.17.04 @ 12:59PM|#
Nick,
Hee hee, you know I kid. Besides, the competition would be pretty fierce in that category, especially if a certain poster whose name begins with L, ends with O, and has ONEWACK in between gets nominated...
Josh Shepard|8.30.04 @ 7:44AM|#
You probably heard of me by now. Real/Fake I'm what you make of it. Need real address. Need to stop/make friends with real andria. Get wet or dry it's all up to you....