Jeff Taylor | August 29, 2003
At 20 MTV is showing its age. Have Madonna, Britney Spears, and Christina Aguilera bring faux lesbo to basic cable? Yawn. Now if the trio had kicked off the network's Video Music Awards sporting Les Pauls and covering a Molly Hatchet or April Wine fret fest, we'd all still be agape. Hell, a few windmilled A-chords, something, anything different from this crew.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"Music videos" are inherently a contradiction. Music is
something to listen to, not "watch." I was there in 82/83 when MTV
began, and after about 1 year, I realized that all "music videos"
are stupid, pointless, and blasphemous to Music.
And yes--I remember April Wine--they actually toured through my
town not too long ago...
'Roller' by April Wine:
Gonna catch a flight to Nevada
Leave her friends at home in L.A.
Seven come eleven or blackjack
Gambling night and day yea
Cause she's a roller now, a high roller baby
She's a roller yea, a high roller baby
She likes to play for double or nothin'
She's tellin' all the boys she's hot
And everybody knows she's ready
To give it everything that she got
Cause she's a roller now, a high roller baby
She's a roller yea, a high roller baby
People try to tell her she's crazy
She doesn't hear a word they say
Tellin' all the boys to get ready
Cause she's givin' it all away
Cause she's a roller now, a high roller baby
She's a roller yea, a high roller baby
Cause she's a roller now, a high roller baby
She's a roller yea, a high roller baby
Bye-bye, bye-bye, bye-bye...
blasphemous to music? when was the last time you went to a
concert where the performers were hiding under a box because it
would detract from the purity of sound? (ok, i can think of several
i've gone to, but i think we probably have different tastes)
i mean, fuck. visual elements have been a part of musical
entertainment for as long as there has been musical
entertainment.
for the record i have no idea what apple wine is/was.
and i haven't had cable in 10 years. i really don't think i'm missing much, except i heard mtv had a show that was all chicks in underwear making out a few years back, which sounded pretty promising.
Man, Britney didn't spend much time on the "innocence" portion of her stellar reinvention process. If she is mimicking Madonna she should be getting close to her "Like a Prayer" phase where she openly abandons her religion. What a star!
MTV jumped the shark years ago when they decided to stop playing music videos and dedicate almost all of their schedule on this whole entertainment schtick. Now doing the VMA's are a joke. They're praising entertainers that they talk about but will not air their videos. The VMAs NEED the sensationalism just to get people to watch the show.
'I was there in 82/83 when MTV began, and after about 1 year, I
realized that all "music videos" are stupid, pointless, and
blasphemous to Music."
It took a whole year???
It's nice to know some things never change.
It might just be me, but I think G4 (computer & video games
channel if you haven't seen it.) has the chance to be the next big
thing in cable channels that cater to the youth. They remind me a
lot of MTV in the earlier days - they're low budget, the hosts
aren't very good, and their programming is limited. All of that
means they really focus on the games and not the phenomonon.
http://www.g4tv.com/html/home.asp
Another plug for G4 - Cinematch and Starcade are awesome. Cinematch might be the gamer answer to music videos.
Maybe if they were feeling each other up too there might've been a story. I guess.
Madonna jumped ages ago. She hit rock bottom with her cameo in the last Bond movie, which was the worst acting I've seen since "Battlefield Earth."
Why are their separate categories for Best Video, Best Male Video, and Best Femal Video? Does that mean "Best Video" is composed completely by genderless pop hit generating software?
if they insist on broadcasting all this stuff and doing this
whole mtv thing, faux lesbo pics on yahoo the next morning is the
most preferable outcome for someone who doesn't have cable like
myself.
ave faux lesbo!
Every year I watch the VMA's and every year they keep getting
worse.
Watching Kelly Osbourne and Avril Lavigne (two very, very young
women with exceedingly dubious musical backgrounds) present Duran
Duran with a Lifetime Achievement award just seemed utterly stupid.
Shouldn't they be awarded by one of their peers perhaps?
It's this sort of thoughtlessness on the part of MTV's style over
substance that just churns my stomache.
Want more? MTV continuly mixed Johny Cash with Justin Timberlake
and Eminem. That's like mixing fine cognac with Zima. Zimply
awful.
At one point the network censors were bleeping (well really they
just cut the sound) the word "bitches", but not "hoes" and 20
minutes later they flip flopped - cutting "hoes" but not "bitches".
Utterly clueless.
I'm in my late 20s and realize that MTV simply isn't for me anymore
- it's for the kids. But I like to keep up with it... in some cases
it is on the cutting edge - but mostly it's just bland
entertainment.
As for Madonna - don't knock her too hard - she's a complete pussy
cat... I think she was the best looking woman there last night.
We'll see how good Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera look at 45
after they have poped out a few kids. I doubt they will even be
making their so-called music.
Madonna riffing April Wines 'Coulda Been a Lady' would indeed
have been a moment.
Who still knows about April Wine?
Paul
Will - I agree. I'm age 29, and I feel far too old for MTV. I think Viacom has decided that VH1 is for old farts like me. MTV is for the under 21 crowd. By the way, do they ever play videos on MTV anymore?
They actually do play the occasional video. I think they play an hour or two of videos a day. But they tend to be the same bling n' hoochie fests you can see on BET on heavy rotation. Not missing much.
You know. . . I think of MTV as a profoundly conservative cultural phenomenon. Sort of an updated Dean Martin Celebrity Roast or phoned-in Bob Hope special from the 70s. Except without the drunk old people. Well, except for Ozzy. Really, does anything suprizing actually happen on it? Anything new? It's as barren as Clear Channel if you're hoping to encounter some sort of interesting music. But, like someone said above, it's for kids.
MTV was a lot better in the 80s, when they actually played
music. Stupid 'Beach House' crap.
I'm going to go break my hip now.
The infuriating thing about MTV is its (more rare nowadays)
occasional brilliance. It produced what I thought was the most
compelling news program I've seen in some time, on professional
video game players (including a past Pac-Man champion and the
reigning Golden Tee title holder).
MTV was also ahead of its time on the ol' reality TV front (The
Real World, which somebody should stick in a time capsule).
But 99.9 percent of its programming sucks. And panders to
teenybopper "bands" and their "fans."
"MTV simply isn't for me anymore -- it's for the
kids."
Whose kids? Yours, maybe. Mine won't get anywhere near that
rot.
"visual elements [on TV] have been a part of musical
entertainment for as long as there has been musical
entertainment."
(Sure, Dhex, as long as you don't blink.)
I, too, was there in 1983 when MTV began, and I, too, began to
realize that all "music" videos are stupid, pointless, and
very, very annoying to watch -- every scene
lasting only about a fraction of a second.
My eyes just aren't built like those of a housefly.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245