Julian Sanchez | July 18, 2003
Ed Rothstein's New York Times review of the new Advertising Age Encyclopedia of Advertising, to my astonishment, takes a swipe at the widespread academic hostility toward advertising. (Perhaps I shouldn't be so astonished... I see Rothstein has a doctorate from the University of Chicago's Committee on Social Thought, which Hayek called home.) Rothstein's conclusion:
[T]he accumulated detail of the encyclopedia makes clear that the ordinary academic model of advertising and its effects is inadequate. Advertisements are a form of communication, not mere manipulation: they help make sense of the world, defining its differences and essences, filtering through its variety, making claims and constructing images. The final task � discerning knowledge amid the claims and images � makes us all cool-hunters in training.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|7.19.03 @ 1:32AM|#
Too bad "liberals" don't always see it the same way.
|7.19.03 @ 2:09AM|#
I'm sorry please remind me .... when did people begin to care what the "academics" opinion on ANYTHING is?