Reason.com

Print|Email

Paging OCP

Cities facing budget crunches are increasingly turning to co-branding arrangements with various corporations. Another reason to resent the Bloomberg ban: no lucrative deals with Phillip-Morris.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.

|6.10.03 @ 1:03AM|

"Citizens expect more efficiency from government," he says. "They don't want property taxes to increase, and they don't want sales taxes to increase."

Instead they get another city payroller selling ads to keep services running as is instead of more efficiently.

|6.10.03 @ 3:03AM|

Another reason to be GLAD of the Bloomberg ban. Please, I'd like place names that might actually bear some connection to their place and not some corporation that may or may not have any connection to the place beyond an advertising one. I'd like some places to be commercial free. Can we get some sort of civic space notion to survive?

Steve in CO|6.10.03 @ 3:48AM|

I wonder when the police will go on strike and the ED-209 "Urban Pascification" model will go online?

:-D A movie well ahead of its time, Robocop.

PS Isn't it funny how Paul Verhoven's distaste for corporations and his tongue-in-cheek portrayal of a lap dog TV-news media has really come to live (aka Fox News)?

david f|6.10.03 @ 12:49PM|

OPP?

oh, nevermind...

drf

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245