Jacob Sullum | May 14, 2003
In San Francisco, a court ruling regarding a voter-approved initiative aimed at replacing cash payments to the homeless with food and shelter has created a perverse situation: A state judge ruled that voters could cut walking-around money (currently $320 to $395 a month) for the elderly, the disabled, and people trying to find jobs but not for able-bodied individuals who refuse to seek employment. The rationale was that the latter payments are state-mandated, while the former were introduced by the county--largely to encourage people to get off welfare. The upshot is a set of incentives that encourages everyone who can work not to. The Board of Supervisors is considering ways to fix the problem before the "Care Not Cash" initiative kicks in on July 1.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|5.15.03 @ 12:06PM|#
san francisco, here I come!
Jessica Saunders|9.10.04 @ 12:23AM|#
EMAIL: master-x@canada.com
IP: 82.146.43.155
URL: http://www.americanpaydayloans.net
DATE: 02/27/2004 07:38:40
People who do not think far enough ahead inevitably have worries near at hand.