February 17, 2003
Those who have called for American Muslims to be more outspoken regarding Islamist terror psychotics should check out Muqtedar Khan's site. Khan is director of international studies at Adrian College in Michigan, and has consistently used his site to speak out forcefully against Islamist outrages.
Here is a passage from his post replying to the Feb. 11 audiotape message purportedly from Osama bin Laden:
Let me tell you that I would rather live in America under Ashcroft and Bush at their worst, than in any �Islamic state� established by ignorant, intolerant and murderous punks like you and Mullah Omar at their best. The US, [its] patriot act not withstanding, is still a more Islamic (just and tolerant) state than Afghanistan ever was under the Taliban.
Khan does not support U.S. action against Iraq, but writes,
Once the war is declared, make no mistake Mr. Saddam
Hussain and Mr.
Bin Laden, We [American Muslims] are with America. We will fight
with America and we will fight for America. We have a covenant with
this nation, we see it as a divine commitment and we will not
disobey the Quran (9:4) � we will fulfill our obligations as
citizens to the land that opened its doors to us and promised us
equality and dignity even though we have a different
faith.
There's much more. Khan's post was reprinted in the Feb. 16 Washington Post.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
He had me right up until he praised Ted Kennedy. A good read nonetheless.
The man has a great deal of courage. And I'm sure that,
unfortunately, he will be seen as a traitor to Islam by the
fundamentalist psychotics who've hijacked that religion.
Come to think of it, kind of like the antiwar protestors -- many if
not most of whom are genuinely patriotic, and who oppose this war
because they believe a first strike is un-American -- who are being
branded "traitors" by the neoconservatives and Christian Right who
are shamelessly exploiting blind ignorant nationalism (not to be
confused with real patriotism).
While we're making hay here, David, it's sort of like Chris Hitchens being branded a "traitor" to the left, by the left. Oh, I don't really care about Hitchens one way or the other, but it sure is boring as hell watching you take someone else's actions and somehow turn that into ideological martyrdom for your side. Whatever, dude.
"you take someone else's actions and somehow turn that into
ideological martyrdom for your side."
Huh? That's CPF's M.O.? Nice acid, "dude".
RH - I shall now plagarize myself:
"While we're making hay here, David..."
If it looked like I was gunning for Freund, I appy
polly loggy.
I was directing me comments to David H., the previous commenter. I
happened to like Charles's post very much.
Oh, hell, I'm not busy right now, so I'll try and make it clearer.
It was a good post, an interesting story, and absolutely devoid of
ideology. I'd really have to do some mental gymnastics to be upset
with CPF, no matter where on the spectrum I sit. As for the subject
of the story, Mssr. Khan, is doing a great thing, if only that he
is doing something that, wrongly or rightly, is rarely seen. Hell,
that makes it interesting, with or without ideology involved.
The piss in my Wheaties was David's "me too, I'm
brave too" pose. I imagine that for DH, no matter what, no matter
where or how, that any struggle, great or small, real or imagined,
is just like the Christian right branding antiwar protestors as
traitors, even though the protestors' patriotism is above reproach.
Which makes the protestors heroes for enduring mean words from
fundies. Heroes!
So, you might (or might not) ask, what do I think of DH's whiny
partisan cheapshotting rhetoric? It's. So. Dull. When I engage in
cheapshotting, as I'm wont to do, everyone, please feel free to
respond in kind.
Remember everyone, it's the Internet: every simgle goddamn word
counts.
"Come to think of it, kind of like the antiwar protestors --
many if not most of whom are genuinely patriotic, and who oppose
this war because they believe a first strike is un-American -- who
are being branded "traitors" by the neoconservatives and Christian
Right who are shamelessly exploiting blind ignorant nationalism
(not to be confused with real patriotism)."
What a pantload. These idiots aren't being called unpatriotic, nor
traitors. They're being told they are wrong. They just prefer the
patriotism charge because they have no answer to the other. Until
they develop a method to deal with the issues instead of pretending
they don't exist they will rightfully continue to be
challenged.
The sooner they see this the better off they will be. Since I think
they put the pet cause of the week ahead of international security,
I don't think most of them ever will.
mj: Maybe all *you're* saying is that they're wrong, but Jesse Walker has reported in this very blog (on Feb 14) that the New York Sun has editorialized that antiwar marchers should be tried for treason.
Just a thought. don't know if I believe it or not:
Is it possible that western Muslims believe that fundy crap, so
they don't say anything?
No, not all western Muslims believe the extremist fundamentalist
line, but unfortunately there are enough of them who do that it's
often risky for moderate Muslims to stand up to those wackos,
especially in Europe where a lot of the immigrants aren't as
well-assimilated as they are in America. That's one reason why you
don't see more moderate Muslims speaking up. Do a search on Google
for Ayaan Hirsi Ali or Fadime Sahindal and you'll see my
point.
We're blessed in the West with societies which not only offer legal
freedom of speech but also free and open cultures which make it a
lot safer for us to stand up to our own Taliban (i.e. Falwell,
Robertson, Ashcroft) without fear of tons of death threats.
By the way, just as Muqtedar Khan rightly denounces Osama bin Laden
as antithetical to Islam, am I the only one who thinks that the
so-called "Christian" right is un-Christian? I think the "Christian
right" is the modern-day version of the Pharisees.
Johnny:
As with my post, your post offers up a little too broad stereotype.
I would be careful about comparing the
Falwell-Robertson-Ashcroft-types with the Taliban. There's nothing
wrong with speaking out about things one thinks are not as they
should be, whether I agree with them or not. It's when those
beliefs are put into official practice and infringe on the rights
of others that it becomes a problem-they have a right to their
beliefs. I have found many on the "Christian Right" to be quite
"Christian" as well as those who are hypocritical. I have found
poeple on the left to be sincere and open-minded in their actions
as well, yet there are also those who, while demanding their free
speech are the first to shout down anyone they disagree with. I'm
much more afraid of crossing the political left than the political
right. Which side is more "Taliban-like". Don't know.
I always liked the Wrath of Khan. And he's exactly right on the
relative merits of practicing Islam in the U.S. as compared to any
Arab state. You get closer to the whole point of the f-ing religion
when you stick to the whole tolerance thing.
This guy reminds me of the Japanese American soldiers who enlisted
from within the U.S. containment camps in Wyoming. I saw it on PBS
the other night. Apparantly, that all Japanese American unit was
the most highly decorated unit in the war. Amazing. They were
actually fighting for something that they had been forcibly removed
from. I'll bet Khan would do the same.
Huzzah Islamic Americans like Khan!
For a long damn time now I've been asking, "Where are the
American Muslims?" In the face of the 9-11 attacks and a slew of
other rotten events I just can't help but think that western
muslims aren't stepping up to bat when it comes to defending their
religion.
Jack asses like Jerry & Pat have made major inroades into
conservative polotics - simply by bashing Muslims.
It's time for more moderate, westernized Muslims to step up and lay
healthy claim to their religion.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245