Jesse Walker | December 12, 2002
How tamper-proof are these new electronic voting procedures? The question has the whiff of the paranoid about it, perhaps because such suspicions are inevitably most popular among whichever political faction is on the outs. It can be taxing to sort the legitimate arguments from partisans' wishful thinking, especially in a realm with as many uncertainties as this one.
But there's more to the question than sour grapes. (For the record, I have no strong party preference myself.) The Baltimore City Paper has just published a skeptical but even-handed look at the new voting technologies, raising some uncomfortable questions about their potential for fraud. Poli-sci junkies will especially enjoy the discussion of this past election's unusual outcome in Georgia
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|12.12.02 @ 11:03AM|#
Offer a reward for anyone who can change the results from the input. Better yet, announce that it is impossible to change the results then watch the fur fly.