America the Paranoid

From the man who tried to shoot Andrew Jackson to The War of the Worlds, a brief history of political paranoia from Jesse Walker's The United States of Paranoia.

(Page 3 of 3)

Cantril’s numbers are dubious, and the people interviewed in his book were not a representative sample of the population. “Nobody died of fright or was killed in the panic, nor could any suicides be traced to the broadcast,” the media scholar Michael Socolow noted in a 2008 essay for The Chronicle of Higher Education. “Hospital emergency-room visits did not spike, nor, surprisingly, did calls to the police outside of a select few jurisdictions. The streets were never flooded with a terrified citizenry.…Telephone lines in New York City and a few other cities were jammed, as the primitive infrastructure of the era couldn’t handle the load, but it appears that almost all the panic that evening was as ephemeral as the nationwide broadcast itself, and not nearly as widespread. That iconic image of the farmer with a gun, ready to shoot the aliens? It was staged for Life magazine.”

Of the people who did mistake the fake news bulletins for real reports, a portion were under the impression that the invaders were not extraterrestrials but Germans, a less implausible scenario. Even the spikes in telephone calls didn’t necessarily represent public panic. The press critic W. Joseph Campbell has pointed out that the calls could be “an altogether rational response of people who neither panicked nor became hysterical, but sought confirmation or clarification from external sources generally known to be reliable.” Campbell added that the call volume must also have included “people who telephoned friends and relatives to talk about the unusual and clever program they had just heard.”

If Welles’ broadcast derived some of its impact from Americans’ anxieties about international tensions, the exaggerated reports about the response have persisted because they speak to another set of fears. After the play aired, the prominent political commentator Walter Lippmann took the opportunity to warn against “crowds that drift with all the winds that blow, and are caught up at last in the great hurricanes,” adding that those “masses without roots” and their “volcanic and hysterical energy” are “the chaos in which the new Caesars are born.” As Socolow wrote, the legend of the Mars panic “cemented a growing suspicion that skillful artists—or incendiary demagogues—could use communications technology to capture the consciousness of the nation.”

To capture consciousness: what a chilling image. It’s an idea that appears when dissidents warn that our leaders are using the mass media to brainwash us. But you can also find the fear among those leaders themselves, who have a long history of fretting over the influence of any new medium of communication. If Orson Welles was cast as a wizard with the power to cloud men’s minds, his listeners were imagined as a mindless mob easily misled by a master manipulator. The social order is disrupted; riots are sparked from afar.

The War of the Worlds story is usually told as a parable about popular hysteria—of a sudden spike in the sort of fear that Hofstadter’s essay decried. But at least as much, it is a parable about elite hysteria—of the anti-populist anxiety that Hofstadter’s essay exemplified. No account of American paranoia can be complete unless it includes the latter.  

This article is adapted from The United States of Paranoia, by Jesse Walker.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • anon||

    Wow, thanks! I totally haven't heard that someone at Reason wrote a book recently.

  • sarcasmic||

    I'm sure someone lives under a rock.

  • anon||

    Hah! That's a pretty good commercial.

    I actually do miss commercials since ditching satellite/cable TV. Some are a lot more funny than certain programming options.

  • PapayaSF||

    Whoa, sarcasmic needs his sarcasm meter adjusted!

  • OldMexican||

    To be sure, there is more to Hofstadter’s paranoid style than mere belief in a conspiracy theory.

    That Leonard and his shifty eyes! I knew there was more to that guy that met the eye!

  • Longtorso, Johnny||

    In an excerpt from his new book, The United States of Paranoia, Jesse Walker details the long history of American political fearmongering.

    Jesse now speaks of Jesse in the 3rd person.

    I'm going directly to the source and reading Jim Marrs.

  • anon||

    Jesse now speaks of Jesse in the 3rd person.

    You aren't supposed to refer to yourself as "I" when writing because of its ambiguity.

  • Jesse Walker||

    I didn't write the blog post, actually. I mean, except insofar as most of it is a quote from the article I wrote.

  • AndrewZ||

    I agree that the term "conspiracism" is inadequate. It is too clinical and doesn't capture the visceral fear of imminent personal destruction that the paranoid mentality breeds.

    But the key element of this way of thinking is the belief that something vitally important - your mind, your body or your institutions - is being occupied and corrupted by a hostile force. It is the fear of the enemy within. This naturally leads to paranoia, because a person who has begun to think in this way no longer knows who or what to trust. They feel betrayed and abused and this in turn makes them angry. Therefore we should refer to this phenomenon as "violationism" or "violationist thinking", because its defining characteristic is an acute sense of violation.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.