Jacob Sullum from the June 2010 issue
Placing small signs below eye level is not usually an effective way to advertise your business. But that’s what a Dallas ordinance requires.
In February the Institute for Justice launched a protest against the city’s limits on the size and position of retailers’ window signs. A 2008 ordinance says business signs may not be placed in the upper two-thirds of windows or glass doors and may not cover more than 15 percent of the glass. But because the rules apply only to commercial speech, local business owners could conspicuously display I.J.’s posters saying “End the Dallas Sign Ban” without risking fines.
That exception, I.J. argues, only underlines the absurdity of the rules. The ordinance, which I.J. is challenging in federal court on First Amendment grounds, is ostensibly aimed at deterring robberies by maintaining visibility from the street. Yet it neither requires windows nor demands that they be uncovered. It only insists that whatever covers them cannot have anything to do with the products or services sold by the business.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
nfl jerseys|11.4.10 @ 10:25PM|#
yurt
Scarpe Nike|8.3.11 @ 4:58AM|#
is good
sd|1.25.12 @ 4:22AM|#
sd