David Harsanyi | June 10, 2009
(Page 2 of 2)
Selling the 298 million Internet users in China sub-par American computers is the best way to advance our values. Even better, we won't have to "impose" a thing.
David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of Nanny State. Visit his Web site at www.DavidHarsanyi.com.
COPYRIGHT 2009 THE DENVER POST
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Just shut down the thread. No one is going to top John.
Seriously, shut it down and just walk away.
Let's make this thread even worse and talk about how Rand al'Thor would have dealt with this porn filter.
And we diplomatically recognize this country
because...?
...we owe them a fuck-ton of money?
How about a free Dr Pepper for everyone who comments in this
thread?
(This comment is not officially sanctioned by Dr Pepper Snapple Group
or its bottlers and distributors.)
BTW, don't forget to check out Rebecca MacKinnon's blog for
more.
This has been brought up before and I will bring it up again:
The Chinese censor's task seems to be hopeless.
If the word 'freedom' is forbidden, couldn't the Chinese bloggers
substitue 'fr33d0m' instead (or whatever the Chinese language
equivilant is)?
"If the word 'freedom' is forbidden, couldn't the Chinese
bloggers substitue 'fr33d0m' instead (or whatever the Chinese
language equivilant is)?"
They use a sympbol for each word rather than a letter. You would
have to substute another whole word for that to work.
"They use a sympbol for each word rather than a letter. You
would have to substute another whole word for that to work."
I guess they can substitute ones that look similar.. like instead
of 自由 "Freedom," 目油 "Eye Oil"
"If you're gonna live in China, learn to speak English."
Your Kung Fu is most powerful Slackhopper.
Warty:
Let's make this thread even worse and talk about how Rand al'Thor would have dealt with this porn filter.
When your only tool is balefire, everything looks like a
forsaken.
Also, how can we complain about China wanting to censor the
Internet, when virtually all western democratic governments are
trying to legislate to do the same?
The only reason western democracies haven't been as successful as
China, is the western democracies are run by lawyers and such, who
are pretty clueless about the technology... while China is run by
efficient technocrats with engineering degrees. European countries,
as an example, have all banned a bunch of political topics from the
internet, it is just that those politicians haven't the first clue
what a "firewall" is in order to demand a national firewall.
Chinese internet censorship isn't because they are any less of a
liberal society, it is simply because western politicians are no
longer competent enough to run a proper police state.
"western politicians are no longer competent enough to run a
proper police state."
Yes we can!
Chinese internet censorship isn't because they are any less
of a liberal society, it is simply because western politicians are
no longer competent enough to run a proper police state.
Very interesting perspective. I think you're on to something.
I guess they can substitute ones that look similar.. like
instead of 自由 "Freedom," 目油 "Eye Oil"
No it's easier than that. For each Chinese characters, there are
many that have the same pronunciation. Instead of Freedom, you
could say "剚鱿" (erect cuttlefish) which sounds identical. There are
250 different combinations with this sound. If you allow the tone
to be different, the number of combinations goes into the
thousands.
This is why I'm ambivalent about "boycott Chinese Products!" movements: While I don't like the idea of my money being used to advance the communist Chinese government, I also know that money and technology do more to advance the cause of freedom worldwide than all the balloon-juice issued forth by all the politicians in the world.
Can't they just wipe the Windoze off of their machines and install Linux? Ooops. Spy programmie gone. (Nothing against the corporation, which does excellent research; it's just that their OS happens to suck hard donkey balls.)
Wow. It took twenty-seven posts for some basement-dwelling Linux trendoid to chime in with oh-so-fashionable MS-bashing (psst: You forgot to spell it "M$"). That's pretty slow, in terms of Hipster Response Time; maybe a couple more cans of Rockstar are in order.
I support Microsoft as a company and hate the "anti-monopoly"
action that has been taken against them...
But I agree that Windows is pretty lousy nowadays.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245