Henry Payne | May 15, 2009

Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Heh. Pretty funny. Now if we can keep up this pattern of every other Friday Funny actually being good that's a definite improvement over every third one being clever.
Not bad.
Chris Muir has
a good one today too, if that Pelosi show from yesterday is of
interest.
Hi. My name is Zero Comments. I love your blog, John.
And that Lonewhacko novel is to die for. Literally.
Is that picture of Obama racist?
No, he is driving something other than a Cadillac.
I have to agree. This is a step up. It definitely passes the Marmaduke Test by a lot and almost made it to the Laugh Out Loud Test.
Is Henry Payne incapable of drawing the Chrysler logo, or just
the Dodge Ram head?
Maybe he had to spell it out for some readers?
Still not funny. But right on point. It's got a nice beat but you can't dance to it. Would have been better if "taxpayer" was already under the tire.
Is that picture of Obama racist?
Sure! I think he's a retarded douche, and I looked at it. QED.
Zero Comments | May 15, 2009, 8:12am | #
Hi. My name is Zero Comments. I love your blog, John.
And that Lonewhacko novel is to die for. Literally.
Nobody should be linking to blogs here. Especially commerceul
blogs. More especially anything mirroring SugarFree stories with or
without permission.
Needs more cliches.
Obama should be driving a great big bus, with "Socialism Express"
for a route sign. Pelosi and Waxman should be in the windows of the
bus, playing "vroom, vroom" with toy Priuses. And Geithner should
be pushing "Mr Bondholder" under the wheels, while Barney Frank
steals his wallet.
Mr to you NG #
Nobody should be linking to blogs here. Especially commercial
blogs.
__________________________
that Lonewhacko novel is to die for. Literally.
To be clear, I intended "to die for" to mean that the writing is so
bad, it's deadly.
More especially anything mirroring SugarFree stories with or
without permission.
Seeing as I'm the one who created LoneWacko: The Novel, I'll be the
judge of that, not NutraSweet.
And this cartoon was...actually on point. Not particularly funny,
but at least accurate.
Seeing as I'm the one who created LoneWacko: The Novel, I'll
be the judge of that, not NutraSweet.
Have you sent the cease and decist letter yet? What are you doing
to protect your intellectual property?
It's a collaborative project. I want people to add to it and to host it. I'll deal with NutraSweet myself. (rubs hands)
(rubs hands)
He is probably ready for one of your hot oil massages right now.
Good thinkin'.
Haven't seen anybody commenting where it is now, that Ninja chick
place. Where else is it?
Where else is it?
Bronwyn put it on Google Docs too. It doesn't matter, because no
one else is really contributing, which kind of eliminates the
point.
It's a collaborative project
Is that why it's so poorly written? I managed to slog through four
paragraphs before concluding that it was some sort of high school
project for the short-bus riders.
Is that why it's so poorly written?
It's poorly written to express LoneDipshit's thought patterns. Or
else you just have no taste. I'll decide which later.
I love the way the elitist professional writers are dissing LoneWacko: The Novel without providing samples of their own fine work.
Except the UAW guy should have been drawn with a top hat, and smoking a cigar made of a $100 dollar bill.
Lonewacko: The Novel is the literary equivalent of the emotion you get when you beat a state-of-the-art supercomputer at Clue. The only reason (drink!) I haven't added anything is that the bar's been raised so high and I have writer's block. Besides, Epi's impromptu narration whenever LoneWacko shows up in a thread is good enough for me.
It's poorly written to express LoneDipshit's thought
patterns
Ah, I see. It succeeds even when it fails!
But do more than six people care?
Bronwyn put it on Google Docs too. It doesn't matter,
because no one else is really contributing, which kind of
eliminates the point.
Sorry for the posting restrictions. I just don't want to bother
with a load of moderation.
Where is the Google doc? I have heard of that but have never used
it.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245