David Harsanyi | March 25, 2009
(Page 2 of 2)
Yet one of the most concerning aspects of all of this meddling is that every sweeping action of government has necessitated another more intrusive, more far-reaching action—with no end in sight.
When does the prescription run out? Or does it ever run out?
David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Denver Post and the author of Nanny State. Visit his Web site at www.DavidHarsanyi.com.
COPYRIGHT 2009 THE DENVER POST
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Hey, whatever happened to the shill Weigal?
Did he run off with joe to get gay married in Vermont?
Anyone else support Obama in November and actually have the balls
to defend it?
I guess not! Morons.
We don't need an exit strategy for the bailout. Talk of exit
strategies is defeatist nonsense. Besides:
-Already we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.
-We will be greeted as liberators.
-American boys will never do what we should have Asian boys
doing.
-Your sons will never be sent to fight in a foreign war.
-The boys will be home by Christmas.
-On to Richmond!
Timmy has adopted the Bush-ERA of "failure is not an option",
just clap harder Iraq strategy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GK9Rg9M6-g
In what I hope will become a multi-million dollar catchphrase
for me in the near future, here is my solution to the whole credit
situation:
"Army of Accountants"
"Already we can see the light at the end of the tunnel."
The light at the end of this tunnel is a train.
So early in the thread and so many contenders for the
win...
"Failure is not an option. It's inevitable."
"We will be greeted as liberators"
"The light at the end of the tunnel is a train"
Man... all great.
"The light at the end of the tunnel is a train"
An appropriate observation, perhaps, but well worn joke!
Well the FDIC already has the authority to deal with banks and the other financials can be dealt with using existing anti-trust laws. They broke up Standard Oil and Bell Telephone because they were too big why not AIG?
Exit strategy? Why would you want to get out of something that will so obviously work? And why bother returning control of companies that you now control? Capitalism is eeeeeeevviiiiiiil! Who cares if it's the system that gave us the highest standard of living in the developed world? That's just coincidence.
What the government doesn't want to accept is the fact that the
recession is the cure, because it would leave them nothing to do
and no justification for stealing from future taxpayers to pay off
their pals who made bad bets on derivatives.
If they really must do something fiscally reckless to look like
they are taking action, how about permanently repealing the federal
income tax? It would increase the annual deficit by less than the
combined bailouts and spending increases have done so far, and
would give almost everyone a quick and substantial raise in
take-home pay.
"The light at the end of this tunnel is a train."
Said train is (a) assembled in China (b) using parts made in India
(c) powered by oil from the middle east. Globalization at its
finest!
[quote]Well the FDIC already has the authority to deal with
banks and the other financials can be dealt with using existing
anti-trust laws. They broke up Standard Oil and Bell Telephone
because they were too big why not AIG?[/quote]
That only occurs if the firm is so large that it is anticompetitive
- not systemically importatnt.
Eric...
I'm not sure I get your point. Isn't it a great thing that China,
India, and the middle east can get along to create something so
widely beneficial as a train? Sure beats them shooting at each
other.
Isn't it wonderful how the Sunnis and Shiites can cooperate to
fight the Americans? See how we have united Iraq (against
us)?
(Circa 2005)
I tend to be leery of conspiracy theories, but I'm starting to
wonder if bailout failure is a bug and not a feature. It's a short
step from "don't let a crisis go to waste" to "the longer the
crisis, the more we can do with it."
Of course it could just be their ideological blinders. To a statist
all failures in the individual, corporate, or nonprofit spheres
should be addressed by more government power/spending/taxing.
Unfortunately, their prescription for government failure is the
same thing.
Any bets on when we'll start seeing wage and price
controls?
Haven't we already?
For Example...
I tend to be leery of conspiracy theories, but I'm starting
to wonder if bailout failure is a bug and not a feature. It's a
short step from "don't let a crisis go to waste" to "the longer the
crisis, the more we can do with it."
Worked for FDR.
Perhaps we need a law that anyone in government who got a campaign contribution from any organization that received TARP funds should immediately return that contribution.
jsh: Well, I'm no fan of FDR, but I think he was sincere in his efforts. At the time there was much "informed opinion" that the USSR and Germany were having economic success with their policies. Of course most of us know better now.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245