Chip Bok | March 6, 2009

Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Actually...not half bad.
Except for the part about Big Government dying in 1996. That's just
stupid.
But other than that.
agree - not bad
if you handicap the cartoon by considering it's Bok's work, it's
excellent
rubber-stamp, minimal effort, calculated to be
bien-pensant aligned-with-original-post comment
www.privacy-troll.theypaymetodothis.theydon'tpayou!
*eyes wide...hair straightens... stands on end*
ZOMBIES!!!
Feets don't fail me now!
Big Government looks rather friendly ... still, shoot 'em in the head!
We did not bury the era of big government in 1996, we cut a few taxes but government had our credit card so they kept on getting bigger.
Racist, racist racist!
Come on people, isn't it obvious? This racist cartoonist is, in a
blatantly racist manner, invoking racist stereotypes about zombies
and voodoo. Haven't you seen The Serpent and the Rainbow, the
racist movie about Haitian voodoo zombies? This cartoon is
obviously meant to appeal to the racist paranoia of white people.
This is an attempt to distract white people's attention from the
real issues by evoking racist images of black voodoo doctors
turning people into zombies.
The other thing wrong with this cartoon is that it is racist.
We did not bury the era of big government in 1996
I think it's referencing the fact that Bill Clinton said in 1996
that the era of big government was over.
the era of big government was over
Not yet, but soon - ie when the governed are fully absorbed into
the governors.
Sorry no. And not just no FUCK no.
The era of BIG Government was resurrected eight years ago by W and
a Rep. congress.
Obama and the Dems are just continuing what W and the Reps
started.
So much for hope and change should be the theme.
Dude, watch that epithet!
Reagan's "voodoo economics," didn't they work?
And I voted against the guy. Twice!
Love the illustration of Zombie Big Government
The smiling, happy, benign one portrayed? The artist blew it. It
should have been the scariest, bloodiest, smelliest zombie ever
drawn, as befitting the calamity ahead.
A "savior" can "raise the dead." YES!
When, in the history of religion, did that happen? I admit, I'm not
the most well versed on religion, but I don't recall any of them
having saviors that raise the dead.
I consider this a win since the bar was set at beating any
Marmaduke cartoon last week. I realize it's a low bar, but this
clearly beats it like an olympic champion powering over the
pole-vault bar.
Reinmoose, if you're being snarky, fine. Otherwise the idea of
raising the dead is pretty entrenched in Christian myth (e.g.,
Lazarus). I'm guessing you're being snarky though.
no... I wasn't being snarky
I forgot about Lazarus
/embarassed only slightly
'When, in the history of religion, did that happen? I admit, I'm
not the most well versed on religion, but I don't recall any of
them having saviors that raise the dead.'
John 11:1-45
Luke 24:6
1 Corinthians 15:52
Apocalypse of Saint John (aka Revelations) 20:11-15
On a related note, don't forget 4 KINGS 4:18-36 (2 Kings 4:18-36 in
the Protestant Bible) and Acts 36-41)
Mad Max | March 6, 2009, 8:20am | #
Racist, racist racist!
Come on people, isn't it obvious? This racist cartoonist is, in a blatantly racist manner, invoking racist stereotypes about zombies and voodoo. Haven't you seen The Serpent and the Rainbow, the racist movie about Haitian voodoo zombies? This cartoon is obviously meant to appeal to the racist paranoia of white people. This is an attempt to distract white people's attention from the real issues by evoking racist images of black voodoo doctors turning people into zombies.
The other thing wrong with this cartoon is that it is racist.
Don't forget, "Birth of a Nation" inspired the zombie genre. You
hit the mark right on.
Reinmoose, not to worry - the fables of your tribe are are far
to many to keep track of.
I give Chip a B+ best effort evah!
Mad Max was lying in wait ready to beat you over the head with his bible at a moments notice. I'm guessing he has it tied to his circe.
Paul Krugman on NYT today: "Geithner and Paulson, you naughty boys! Don't feed stray zombies..... now if you bring them home as pets, then you can feed them...."
Hey, lay off Max. He managed to make an oblique The Serpent and the Rainbow reference. However, he would have really nailed it had he somehow brought Angel Heart into it.
Zombie Uncle Sam should be leading a zombie army of banks,
carmakers, homebuilders, unions, and realtors.
And they're coming for YOU!
Moose, don't feel bad, it's not like any raising of the dead
actually happened.
Lazarus was faking comotose because his wife annoyed the hell out
of him and he wanted to be rid of her obnoxious ass. Jesus grabbed
him by the nutsack (as he were wont to do) and ol' Laz yelped and
lept up from his false slumber to the applause of those gathered
'round. The end.
Moose, don't feel bad
I don't really, actually. I figure it's a testament to my continued
dedication to not reading my bible. I got weak once and read
half-way through Genesis, but I was able to stop myself before my
brain rotted too far.
I thought Lazarus was killed by Macy's.
And it's "Revelation" (no "s" on the end). I say this fully
understanding that the neurosis is my problem and is in no way
intended to burn Mr Max.
I mean Acts 9:36-41
Damn. For a second there I thought you had the special edition that
explains everything.
Ah well.
He managed to make an oblique The Serpent and the Rainbow
reference. However, he would have really nailed
it
You just had to bring up that part of The Serpent and The
Rainbow, didn't you? I just don't want to think of Bill
Pullman that way.
You just had to bring up that part of The Serpent and The
Rainbow, didn't you? I just don't want to think of Bill Pullman
that way.
I was thinking more of the blood sex scene between Mickey Rourke
and Lisa Bonet in Angel Heart.
Even without the fondness I hold in my heart for zombies, I
think that would have made me smile.
I'm in shock, but that was actually funny. And on Friday. The name
works!!
You're trying to tell me you aren't thinking about scrotums on a Friday morning? Bitch, please.
Reinmoose,
Hmm, was that comment snark?
Anyway, raising the dead is something which messiahs, heroes, etc.
have been doing for a long time. Or well, they've made claims about
such that is.
Mad Max,
Yeah, that's true (re: the various Biblical citations), but most of
what is claimed of Christ was claimed of many figures prior to him.
He fits within a long line of Mediterranean/Near East heroes,
messiahs, etc.
You're trying to tell me you aren't thinking about scrotums
on a Friday morning? Bitch, please.
I'm shaving mine right now.
"At the age of fourteen a Zoroastrian named Vilma ritualistically
shaved my testicles. There really is nothing like a shorn
scrotum...it's breathtaking. I highly suggest you try it."
I'm just having a bad morning. Forget I said anything.
I'm going to stop talking now
People get mythology mixed up all the time, Rein. You won't believe how many times I forget that Leda was turned into a swan and not a bull like Europa.
'most of what is claimed of Christ was claimed of many figures
prior to him. He fits within a long line of Mediterranean/Near East
heroes, messiahs, etc.'
The similarities between paganism and Christianity can't be all
that great. I've read too many secularists who harp on how
different Christianity was from paganism (to the disadvantage of
the former).
Mad Max,
Jesus was just one of a variety of peripatetic faith healers, etc.
who were popular before, during and after Christianity's founding.
My personal favorite of this archetype is Apollonius of Tyanna.
This is one of the reasons why it takes so long in the process of
creating the canonical Gospels for Jesus to become the Christ and
then eventually divine.
I've read too many secularists who harp on how different Christianity was from paganism (to the disadvantage of the former).
Not necessarily. One of the most common tropes from earlier
secularists was that
paganism:christianity::christianity:secularism. It's an interesting
rhetorical move: You show how Christianity was an improvement over
what went before and then use it to show how continuing the good
trends in Christianity while tossing out the stuff the author
considers to be nonsense will bring you to a modern secularist
position. Among others, James Frazer makes a similar move.
I can't really unpack it all, but when secularists emphasize a
disconnect between paganism and Christianity in the midst of
polemic, there are rhetorical reasons that have little to do with
any actual differences.
I agree with some of the above posters - we don't really have need for an alternative this week. However, I did one prior to knowing that...
Is it just me, or does the zombie LOOK like Bill Clinton. If so, we have double funny for the same price...
Because the government was so itty bitty and cute for the past 8 years. Yeah, right.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245